Case law

Fishermen's Dock Cooperative, Inc. v. Ronald H. Brown, Secretary of Commerce

52 F.3d 1122 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 2, 1995

FISHERMEN'S DOCK COOPERATIVE, INC., et al., Appellants, v. Ronald H. BROWN, Secretary of Commerce, Appellee. No. 94-5039. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. March 22, 1995. … Rule 36(b). 2 In Fishermen's Dock Cooperative, Inc. v. Ronald H. Brown, Secretary of Commerce, Civ.

Biscayne Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Pratt

646 F. Supp. 371 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 8, 1986

In its complaint (Counts I-V), plaintiffs sought an order requiring the Board to remove the receiver. … Biscayne Federal Savings & Loan Association v. Federal Home Loan Bank Board, 720 F.2d 1499 (11th Cir.1983).

Lucas v. District of Columbia

505 F. Supp. 2d 122 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 1, 2007

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C.Cir.2002). … Browning, 292 F.3d at 242 .

CHH CAPITAL HOTEL PARTNERS, LP v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

152 A.3d 591 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 2, 2017

CHH next appealed to the Board of Real Property Assessments and Appeals4 (“BRPAA” or “the Board”). … Hovermale’s assessments, as submitted to the Board. Though, regrettably, there is no indication why the Board departed below Mr.

In Re Lebowitz

944 A.2d 444 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 13, 2008

As the Supreme Court of California explained in Stratmore v. … Gould v. State of Florida, 99 Fla. 662 , 127 So. 309, 311 (1930) (emphasis added). 2 .

Colston v. Burnet

59 F.2d 867 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 31, 1932

The commissioner and the Board of Tax Appeals disallowed all of the items. There were no findings of fact by the board. … A.] 129 F. 287, 290 ; Hutchins v. State Bank, 12 Metc. [Mass.] 421, 426; Cooper v. Canal Co., 6 N. C. 195 ; Lipscomb v. Condon, 56 W. Va. 416 , 49 S. E. 392 , 67 L. R. A. 670, 167 Am. St.

Appalachian Regional Healthcare, Inc. v. Shalala

131 F.3d 1050 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 23, 1997

To be sure, this case would be easier had the Board provided a more thorough explanation for its decision. But the Board’s decision is nevertheless “tolerably terse,” Greater Boston Television Corp. v. … Veterans of Am. v. D.C. Arena L.P., 117 F.3d 579, 587 (D.C.Cir.1997) (quoting Auer v. Robbins, - U.S. -, -, 117 S.Ct. 905, 912 , 137 L.Ed.2d 79 (1997)). . Chevron U.S.A. Inc. v.

Center for Auto Safety v. Tiemann

414 F. Supp. 215 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 28, 1976

E. g., Rainbow Valley Citrus Corp. v. Federal Crop Insurance Corp., 506 F.2d 467, 468-69 (9th Cir. 1974); Brown v. … This is not a case in which the government merely provided a “sounding board” for the generalized views of an “amorphous, ad hoc group.” Nader v. Baroody, 396 F.Supp. 1231 , 1234 & 1233.

In Re Luvara

942 A.2d 1125 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 7, 2008

Reconsideration was denied on March 13, 2007. 1 Neither respondent nor Bar Counsel takes exception to the Board’s recommendation. … (v) The actor has suffered any prior conviction for any violation of this section or any predecessor law hereto, or has been convicted, under any Federal statute or statute of any other state, of an act which would be a violation

Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Akron & Barberton Belt Railroad

385 F.2d 581 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 12, 1967

Belt R.R. v. … Workers of Seafarers Int’l Union, etc. v. Board of Trustees of Galveston Wharves, 351 F.2d 183 , 191 (5th Cir. 1965). . Cf. Fibreboard Paper Prod. Corp. v.

Leyden v. American Accreditation Healthcare commission/urac

83 F. Supp. 3d 241 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 18, 2015

Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (quoting Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)). … McGrath v. Clinton, 666 F.3d 1377, 1380 (D.C. Cir. 2012); accord Howard Univ. v.

In Re Borders

665 A.2d 1381 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 26, 1995

The facts of the crimes, which we do not detail here, are described in United States v. Borders, 693 F.2d 1318, 1319-24 (11th Cir.1982), cert. denied, 461 U.S. 905 , 103 S.Ct. 1875 , 76 L.Ed.2d 807 (1983). … The Hearing Committee and the Board agreed that the third and fourth Roundtree factors counsel against petitioner’s reinstatement.

Darel D. Viles v. William L. Ball, Iii, Secretary of the Navy

872 F.2d 491 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 18, 1989

Rather they addressed staff members’ improper exercise of influence in their capacities as board employees. Thus in Koster v. … Sanders v. United States, 594 F.2d 804, 813 (Ct.Cl.1979). We will not address Viles’s every criticism of the Board’s action.

Martin v. Secretary of the Army

455 F. Supp. 634 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 23, 1977

Both United States v. Cohan, 20 U.S.C.M.A. 469 , 43 C.M.R. 309 (1970) and United States v. … Bland v. Connally, 110 U.S.

Coleman v. United States

311 A.2d 496 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 16, 1973

In contending for the application of the Housing Regulations, the tenants sought to bring into play in these cases the holding of this court in Brown v. … In Knox Hill Tenant Council v.

N. V. Philips' Gloeilampenfabrieken v. Atomic Energy Commission

316 F.2d 401 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 21, 1963

See Rawlings v. Ray, 312 U.S. 96 , 61 S.Ct. 473 , 85 L.Ed. 605 (1941); Chattanooga Foundry & Pipe Works v. Atlanta, 203 U.S. 390 , 27 S.Ct. 65 , 51 L.Ed. 241 (1906); Campbell v. … V.

Webr, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Florian R. Burczynski, Etc., D/B/A Ultravision Broadcasting Co., Intervenor

420 F.2d 158 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 14, 1969

We are, therefore, aware of the teaching of Universal Camera Corp. v. … Guinan v. FCC, 111 U.S. App.D.C. 371, 376, 297 F.2d 782, 787 (1961). However, the appellant argues that this court’s decision in WMOZ, Inc. v.

Stanford Hotels Corp. v. Potomac Creek Associates, L.P.

18 A.3d 725 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 21, 2011

Clay v. Faison, 583 A.2d 1388, 1390 (D.C.1990) (citing Flack v. … See, e.g., Kesler v.

Fort Dearborn Company v. NLRB

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 17, 2016

After the appointments of two Board Members were invalidated, see NLRB v. Noel Canning, 134 S. … Although the court will defer to the Board’s interpretation of the Act, Stanford Hosp. & Clinics v. NLRB, 325 F.3d 334, 337 (D.C.

Priests for Life v. United States Department of Health & Human Services

808 F.3d 1 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 20, 2015

See, e.g., Kavanaugh Dissent at 17-19; Brown Dissent at 9-10. … Priests for Life v. U.S. Dep’t of Health & Human Servs., 772 F.3d 229, 250 (D.C.Cir.2014).