Case law

Beauregard v. Mabus

District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 15, 2012

Fuller v. Winter, 538 F. Supp. 2d 179, 185 (D.D.C. 2008) (quoting Occidental Eng’g Co. v. … Consequently, the Board is “free to draw [its] own reasonable inferences and conclusions from the evidence before [it].” Mudd v. Caldera, 134 F. Supp. 2d 138, 143 (D.D.C. 2001) (citing Mail Order Ass’n of America v.

Northeast Broadcasting, Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission, Naugatuck Valley Service, Inc., Intervenor

400 F.2d 749 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 19, 1968

See Key v. United States, 263 F.Supp. 544 (S.D.Ind.1966). … See also RCA v. United States, 341 U.S. 412 , 71 S.Ct. 806 , 95 L.Ed. 1062 (1951); Mitchell v. Fischer, 110 U.S.App.D.C. 316 , 293 F.2d 155 (1961). .

International Union of Electrical, Radio and MacHine Workers, Afl- Cio-Clc v. National Labor Relations Board, White-Westinghouse Corp., Intervenor. White-Westinghouse Corporation, a Wholly Owned Subsidiary of White Consolidated Industries, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, International Union of Electrical, Radio and MacHine Workers, Etc., Intervenor

604 F.2d 689 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 9, 1979

Pulley v. … NLRB v.

Carpenter v. DC TRAFFIC ADJUD. APP. BD.

530 A.2d 680 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 19, 1987

See Pillis v. … See Jones v. District of Columbia Hackers' License Appeal Board, 455 A.2d 896, 897 (D.C.1983) (substantial evidence test). Therefore some period of suspension was warranted.

Giles v. United States

432 A.2d 739 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 8, 1981

United States, supra (same, where identity is the sole issue); United States v. Brown, supra (same). … Brown, supra (same).

Kimmel v. Gallaudet University

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 4, 2009

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002) (internal quotation marks omitted). … State Comm. of D.C. v. Bebchick, 706 A.2d 569, 573 (D.C. 1998) (quoting Carr v. Brown, 395 A.2d 79, 84 (D.C. 1978)); see McManus v.

Citizen Potawatomi Nation v. Salazar

624 F. Supp. 2d 103 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 12, 2009

However, because the Board’s collateral estoppel decision is upheld, the Court need not reach the Board’s alternative reasoning. See United States v. … In Ramah Navajo School Board, Inc. v.

Adair v. England

217 F. Supp. 2d 7 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 27, 2002

of those boards. … these boards.

Merck & Co., Inc. v. United States Department of Health and Human Services

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 8, 2019

Brown & Williamson, 529 U.S. at 133. … Council v. EPA, 777 F.3d 456, 464 (D.C. Cir. 2014). V.

Heffernan v. Azar

317 F. Supp. 3d 94 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 27, 2018

Mayer, Brown, Rowe & Maw LLP v. IRS , 537 F.Supp.2d 128 , 139 (D.D.C. 2008) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted). … See Mayer, Brown, Rowe & Maw LLP , 537 F.Supp.2d at 139 .

District of Columbia v. Savoy Construction Co.

515 A.2d 698 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 26, 1986

This court applies the Wunderlich Act standards of judicial review to factual determinations by the District of Columbia Contract Appeals Board. District of Columbia v. Heman Ward, Inc., 261 A.2d 836, 838 (D.C.1970). . … See, e.g., Kehm Corp. v.

Leedom v. Kyne

249 F.2d 490 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 16, 1957

LEEDOM et al., individually and as Chairman and Members of and Constituting the National Labor Relations Board, Appellants, v. … National Mediation Board, 1951, 89 U.S.App.D.C. 24, 27 , 189 F.2d 685, 688 ; see also Farmer v.

Western Coal Traffic League v.

108 F.4th 905 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 26, 2024

If a “carrier is revenue adequate,” the Board considers whether “a complaining shipper may be entitled to rate relief.” W. Tex. Utils. Co. v. Burlington N. … s argument by analogy to Fox Television Stations, Inc. v.

Clark v. Scott

329 A.2d 442 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 10, 1974

Friedman v. United States, 310 F.2d 381, 385 , 159 Ct.Cl. 1 (1962); Foust v. Carney, 205 Tenn. 604 , 329 S.W.2d 826 (1959); West v. Board of Education of Prince George’s County, 165 F.Supp. 382 (Md.1958); O’Brien v. … Appellant’s reliance upon Thompson v. Board of Education of District of Columbia, 112 U.S.App.D.C. 89 , 299 F.2d 920 (1962), to counter the defense of laches is unpersuasive.

McGrady v. England

810 F. Supp. 2d 281 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 16, 2011

Mueller v. Winter, 485 F.3d 1191, 1199 (D.C. Cir. 2007). … Smith v. Dalton, 927 F. Supp. 1, 5 (D.D.C. 1996) (quoting Cruse v. Bowen, 867 F.2d 1183, 1184 (8th Cir. 1989)).

Landry v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corp.

204 F.3d 1125 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 3, 2000

The *1135 FDIC Board did not address any of Landry’s claims under Jencks v. United States, 353 U.S. 657 , 77 S.Ct. 1007 , 1 L.Ed.2d 1103 (1957). … In its order the FDIC Board assumed without deciding that Brady v.

Hill v. Smoot

308 F. Supp. 3d 14 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 29, 2018

Anyanwutaku , 151 F.3d at 1056 (finding Heck inapplicable to claim where success in the district court "would have earned nothing more than a 'ticket to get in the door of the parole board' ") (quoting Neal v. … (citing cases); see also Brown v. Hill , 174 F.Supp.3d 66 , 71 (D.D.C. 2016) (examining cases); Hudes v. Aetna Life Ins. Co. , 806 F.Supp.2d 180 , 195-96 (D.D.C. 2011), aff'd , 493 Fed.Appx. 107 (D.C.

Young Men's Christian Ass'n of Washington v. Covington

484 A.2d 589 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 4, 1984

See also, e.g., Jones v. Grant, 344 So.2d 1210, 1212 (Ala.1977) (granting standing to a group of plaintiffs with a special interest in the enforcement of a charitable trust); Lokey v. … Wieck v. Sterenbuch, supra, 350 A.2d at 388 . The movant must provide clear and convincing evidence that the threat exists. In re Antioch University, supra, 418 A.2d at 109 (citing Vargas v.

Keiko Asai v. Leonel J. Castillo, Commissioner, Immigration & Naturalization Service. Keiko Asai v. Attorney General of the United States

593 F.2d 1222 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 13, 1979

Ballenilla-Gonzalez v. I.N.S., 546 F.2d 515, 521 (2d Cir. 1976). … Bearing upon the question of jurisdiction, see Gena v. INS, 424 F.2d 227, 231-32 (5th Cir. 1970) and Luna-Benalcazar v.

People Against Nuclear Energy v. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

678 F.2d 222 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 14, 1982

See Image of Greater San Antonio v. Brown, 570 F.2d 517, 522-23 (5th Cir. 1978) 36 Maj. op. at 229. … Aluli v. Brown, 437 F.Supp. 602 (D.Hawaii 1977), rev'd in part, 602 F.2d 876 (9th Cir. 1979).