Case law

Goss v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, N.D. Indiana · Aug 7, 2020

The ALJ found she “is likely not well qualified to comment on the claimant’s impairments” because she wasn’t a medical expert. [A.R. 44.] … A claimant must furnish evidence from an “acceptable medical source” to establish the existence of an impairment. 20 C.F.R. § 404.1521.

Baltimore County v. AT & T CORP.

735 F. Supp. 2d 1063 · District Court, S.D. Indiana · Sep 20, 2010

The court clearly assumed, however, that the owners had a right to seek an injunction (presumably for ejectment) for the improper expansion of the use of the railroad easement. 15 . … The court does not reach the County’s reliance on the common law doctrine of nellum tempus occuirit regi, translated as “time does not run against the king,” which stems from principles of sovereign immunity.

Haldar

District Court, N.D. Indiana · Jan 27, 2026

Thus, these documents qualify as personnel records of non-parties that fall under this provision's protection. [DE 82 at 5]. … The OIE Report more clearly falls within Section II(A)(5) as an “investigative file” that concerns “the identity and personal information of any non-party complainant” who made complaints about Plaintiff.

Risk v. Ford Motor Co.

48 F. Supp. 2d 1135 · District Court, S.D. Indiana · Apr 29, 1999

The facts alleged in Risk’s amended complaint demonstrate that she clearly knew in 1994 that two male employees received overtime hours and that she did not. … In short, the facts alleged in Risk’s own amended complaint demonstrate that Ford’s acts of denying her overtime and reclassifying/transferring her scarcely qualify as the type of “covert” practices of discrimination that

WILSON v. TRANSUNION, LLC

District Court, S.D. Indiana · Aug 6, 2025

The notice must clearly and concisely state in plain, easily understood language: (i) the nature of the action; (ii) the definition of the class certified; (iii) the class claims, issues, or defenses; (iv) that … Notice will also be published on a website established by the Administrator. Id.

Anello v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, N.D. Indiana · Jan 13, 2020

"The ALJ was not qualified to make his own determination without the benefit of an expert opinion." Akin v. Berryhill, 887 F.3d 314, 317-318 (7th Cir. 2018). … Clearly, the ALJ's RFC assessment is not supported by substantial evidence and remand is required.

Omega Satellite Products Co. v. City of Indianapolis

536 F. Supp. 371 · District Court, S.D. Indiana · Mar 26, 1982

(d) The operator shall furnish each subscriber written instructions that clearly set forth procedures for placing a service call or requesting an adjustment. … Such interconnection shall be made within the time limit established by the City.

BROWN v. CARTER

District Court, S.D. Indiana · Sep 29, 2025

Snyders, 990 F.3d 539, 544 (7th Cir. 2021) ("A preliminary injunction is an exercise of a very far-reaching power, never to be indulged in except in a case clearly demanding it.") … As a practical matter, there are not enough lawyers willing and qualified to accept a pro bono assignment in every pro se case. See Watts v.

RODGERS-ROUZIER v. AMERICAN QUEEN STEAMBOAT OPERATING COMPANY, LLC

District Court, S.D. Indiana · Mar 31, 2023

Rodgers-Rouzier had clearly contested the validity of the arbitration agreements. Id. … The plaintiff appealed that decision to the Seventh Circuit, which ultimately held that the plaintiff qualified for the FAA exemption. Id. at *2 (citing Saxon v. Sw. Airlines Co., 993 F.3d 492 (7th Cir. 2021)).

SMITH v. APRIA HEALTHCARE LLC

District Court, S.D. Indiana · Jun 5, 2025

The notice must clearly and concisely state in plain, easily understood language: (i) the nature of the action; (ii) the definition of the class certified; (iii) the class claims, issues, or defenses; (iv) that … Notice will also be published on a website established by the Settlement Administrator. Id. at 18 (Settlement Agreement and Release § 11.1(d)).

STATE OF INDIANA v. BIDEN

District Court, S.D. Indiana · Jan 20, 2023

FOIA request—the Domestic Policy Council—is not an “agency” subject to FOIA, and (3) the Plaintiffs did not comply with regulations that dictate how FOIA requests to particular groups or units within the EOP that may qualify … guidelines and directives” established pursuant to the FRA.

Aldrich v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, N.D. Indiana · Mar 24, 2020

the ALJ considered Listings 1.02, 1.03, 1.04, 1.06, and 14.09 and found that the record does not contain clinical findings or test results that meet the level of severity required by any of the musculoskeletal system or immune … Opinions from “other medical sources,” such as nurse practitioners, do not qualify as “medical opinions”; nevertheless, the opinions of such sources may provide insight into the severity of an impairment and how it affects

Schmucker v. Johnson Controls Inc

District Court, N.D. Indiana · Oct 28, 2019

Keramida’s consideration of other chemicals for the purpose of establishing the course of the migration from the Johnson Controls site. … Keramida to establish that the contamination in the sewers can reach the indoor air. The problem, however, is that Dr.

Donald W. Campbell v. State of Indiana

Indiana Court of Appeals · Feb 28, 2013

Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before Feb 28 2013, 10:00 am any court except for the purpose of establishing the defense of res judicata, … Moreover, the only testimony that clearly constitutes uncharged misconduct evidence was about Campbell “pinn[ing]” Loretta to the bed, and the court’s admonishment of Loretta outside the presence of the jury suggests the

WILSON-LOVE

District Court, S.D. Indiana · Apr 21, 2026

A straightforward application of well-established Indiana law compels us to agree that Truck- Movers's admission concerning the scope of Mr. … The FMSCRs, at most, supply an alternative basis for establishing TruckMovers's direct negligence.

Aldrich v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, N.D. Indiana · Mar 23, 2020

the ALJ considered Listings 1.02, 1.03, 1.04, 1.06, and 14.09 and found that the record does not contain clinical findings or test results that meet the level of severity required by any of the musculoskeletal system or immune … Opinions from “other medical sources,” such as nurse practitioners, do not qualify as “medical opinions”; nevertheless, the opinions of such sources may provide insight into the severity of an impairment and how it affects

BADGER DAYLIGHTING CORP. v. RUTHERFORD

District Court, S.D. Indiana · Mar 31, 2025

The employer must also establish the covenant is reasonable in scope as to time, activity, and geographic area restricted. … Without a clearly defined work area, it is nearly impossible to know whether restricting Rutherford to the area where she provided services is reasonable.

JENSON v. LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, LLC

District Court, S.D. Indiana · Mar 29, 2024

qualified 'as an expert by knowledge, skill, experience, training, or education'; the expert's reasoning or methodology underlying the testimony must be scientifically reliable … Evidence should be excluded at this stage only if it is "clearly not admissible for any purpose." Barnes v. General Motors LLC, 2023 WL 3436098, at *1 (S.D. Ind. May 12, 2023) (citing Hawthorne Partners v.

Indiana Office of Utility Consumer Counselor v. Indiana Michigan Power Company and Steel Dynamics, Inc.

Indiana Court of Appeals · Mar 11, 2014

The substantial evidence standard authorizes this court to set aside the Commission’s findings of fact only when a review of the whole record clearly indicates the agency’s decision lacks a reasonably sound … McCoy stated that while it is true that the Company made no pension contributions, it is also true that total qualified pension plan cost for the period was slightly negative for this period. Mr.

United States v. SHADOAN

District Court, S.D. Indiana · Nov 12, 2021

Defendants contend that one of the regulations interpreting this provision clearly states, "The reinstatement of a lien does not retroactively reinstate a previously filed notice of lien." 26 C.F.R. 301.6325-1(f). … And even if the one-year period had not already expired, Defendants assert that the United States cannot qualify as a requesting creditor under § 727(d)(1) as it knew of the fraud allegations alleged in its Complaint before