Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersDC

10,000+ results

3.21s

  • United States v. Cassell, Dwayne

    292 F.3d 788 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 11, 2002

    In United States v. … We addressed an analogous situation in United States v. James Brown, 16 F.3d 423 (D.C. Cir.), cert. denied, 513 U.S. 900 (1994).

    Cited 93 timesPublished
  • Caldwell v. Kagan

    District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 18, 2011

    applied to formal pleadings drafted by lawyers, Brown v. District of Columbia, 514 F.3d 1279, 1283 (D.C. … Judges Ginsburg, Griffith and Brown made up the Court of Appeals panel that affirmed Judge Kennedy’s dismissal. Caldwell v. United States Tax Court, No. 09-5166 (D.C. Cir. Jan. 9, 2010) (Ginsburg, Brown, Griffith).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners v. Operative Plasterers' & Cement Masons' International Ass'n

    721 F.3d 678 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 5, 2013

    Cir. 7 We previously rejected the Board’s pre-Deklewa interpretation of section 8(f) in favor of the one it articulated in Deklewa. See Local 150, Int’l Union of Operating Eng’rs v. … Because the Board has exclusive jurisdiction over representation questions, see Road Sprinkler Fitters Local Union 669 v. Herman, 234 F.3d 1316, 1320 (D.C.

    Cited 49 timesPublished
  • Harris v. District of Columbia

    991 A.2d 1199 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 8, 2010

    Brown, supra note 3, 795 A.2d at 62 (citation omitted). … R. 35(a) ("The Court may correct an illegal sentence at any time....”); Brown v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Hopkins v. Price Waterhouse

    618 F. Supp. 1109 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 20, 1985

    Minnesota State University Board, 731 F.2d 465, 481-84 (8th Cir.1984); Skelton v. Balzano, 424 F.Supp. 1231, 1235 (D.D.C.1976). … See Zahorik v. Cornell University, 729 F.2d 85, 93 (2d Cir.1984); Harris v.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Farmer v. United Electrical, Radio & MacHine Workers of America (Ue) Farmer v. American Communications Ass'n. Farmer v. International Fur & Leather Workers Union of United States and Canada

    211 F.2d 36 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 12, 1954

    211 F.2d 36 93 U.S.App.D.C. 178 FARMER et al. v. UNITED ELECTRICAL, RADIO & MACHINE WORKERS OF AMERICA (UE), et al. FARMER et al. v. AMERICAN COMMUNICATIONS ASS'N. FARMER et al. v. … Corp. v. United States, 12 Columbia Broadcasting System v. United States, 13 and Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Campbell v. England

    185 A.2d 726 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 27, 1962

    LaForest v. Board of Commissioners, 67 App.D.C. 306 , 92 F.2d 547 , cert. denied, 302 U.S. 760 , 58 S.Ct. 367 , 82 L.Ed. 5S8; Ritch v. Director of' Vehicles & Traffic of D. of C., D.C.Mun.App., 124 A.2d 301 . 3 . … See Blakey v. Board of Com’rs of District of Columbia, D.C.Mun.App., 177 A.2d 269 . 4 . Jones v. Board of Control, Fla., 131 So.2d 713 ; People v. Salmon, 148 Cal. 303 , 83 P. 42 , 2 L.R.A.,N.S., 1186.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • District of Columbia v. Straus

    District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 14, 2009

    S.A. v. District of Columbia, 543 F. … In Buckhannon Board & Care Home, Inc. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Magnus v. U.S. Attorney General

    District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 2, 2025

    Feb. 5, 2018); Latham v. Brown, 4 Vet. App. 265, 268 (Vet. App. Ct. Feb. 12, 1993) (noting that several courts have upheld the constitutionality of 38 U.S.C. § 5313 and that no court has held it unconstitutional). … See Brown v. Dep’t of Veterans Affairs, 451 F. Supp. 2d 273, 281 (D. Mass. 2006) (dismissing constitutional challenge to § 5313(a)(2) construed as equal protection claim under Fifth Amendment’s Due Process Clause).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • McGettigan v. National Bank of Washington

    320 F.2d 703 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 16, 1963

    Finally it is not contended that defendants had attempted either to remove the trash or to board up the premises. … See, e. g., Brown v. Kendall, 6 Cush. (60 Mass.) 292 (1850) ; 8 Holdsworth, History of English Law, 446-59 (1937). .

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Gerald Brent Fagan v. National Cash Register Company

    481 F.2d 1115 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 21, 1973

    Cleveland Board of Education (6 Cir. 1972), 465 F.2d 1184 , saw invidious discrimination based on sex because of enforced maternity leave without pay. The Fifth Circuit in 1971 saw sex discrimination in Danner v. … Clones (7 Cir. 1970), 432 F.2d 1259 ; Stull v. School Board of Western Beaver Jr.-Sr. High School (3 Cir. 1972), 459 F.2d 339 , with its recognition of the conflicts in various courts. . See, a. g., Freeman v.

    Cited 63 timesPublished
  • Garvey v. O'DONOGHUE

    530 A.2d 1141 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 9, 1987

    Salgo v. Leland Stanford University Board of Trustees, supra note 7, 317 P.2d at 180, 154 Cal.App.2d at 576. … Smith, supra, 318 A.2d at 893 ; Brown v. United States, 126 U.S.App.D.C. 134 , 142, 375 F.2d 310, 318 (1966), cert. denied, 388 U.S. 915 , 87 S.Ct. 2133 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1359 (1967); Smith v.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Van Clief v. Helvering

    135 F.2d 254 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 12, 1943

    See decisions of the Board in Harry T. Nicolai v. Com’r, 42 B.T.A. 899 , affirmed 9 Cir., 126 F.2d 927 ; William D. P. Jarvis v. Com’r, 43 B.T.A. 439 , affirmed Helvering v. … There is nothing to the contrary in the cases cited in the Board’s opinion. The holding in American Cigar Co. v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Washington Post v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

    825 A.2d 296 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 29, 2003

    Brown v. District of Columbia Dep’t of Employment Servs., 700 A.2d 787, 791 (D.C.1997); see also Harris v. … See Short v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Si v. Laogai Research Foundation

    District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 21, 2013

    (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)); U.S. v. Kellogg Brown & Root Servs., Inc., 800 F. … Date: August 21, 2013       Ketanji Brown Jackson               KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District Judge

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Bachman v. BD. OF TR. OF U. OF DIST. OF COLUMBIA

    777 F. Supp. 990 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 8, 1991

    Daye v. Harris, 655 F.2d 258 , 262 n. 11 (D.C.Cir. *996 1981) (quoting Bundy v. Jackson, 641 F.2d 934, 951 (D.C.Cir.1981)). 18 The Court finds that the plaintiff clearly established a pri-ma facie case. … See Parker v. B & O Railroad, 652 F.2d 1012, 1017-18 (D.C.Cir.1981) (citing Daye v. Harris).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hensley v. United States

    292 F. Supp. 3d 399 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 22, 2018

    In this Circuit, decisions by boards for correction of military records are typically reviewed "under an 'unusually deferential' application of the arbitrary or capricious standard." Maneely v. … "As a preliminary matter, the Board did nothing improper by relying on an advisory opinion to render its decision." McDonough v. Stackley , 245 F.Supp.3d 1 , 5 (D.D.C. 2017) ; see Roberts v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Taylor v. United States

    662 A.2d 1368 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 3, 1995

    See, e.g., Earle v. United States, 612 A.2d 1258, 1265 (D.C.1992); Burnette v. United States, 600 A.2d 1082, 1083 (D.C.1991); see also Brown v. … Earle, supra, 612 A.2d at 1265 ; Brown, supra, 546 A.2d at 394 .

    Cited 42 timesPublished
  • Settles v. United States Parole Commission

    429 F.3d 1098 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 8, 2005

    Relying on Koyce v. United States Board of Parole, 306 F.2d 759 (D.C. … See Brown v. Sec’y of Army, 78 F.3d 645, 648 (D.C. Cir. 1996).

    Cited 587 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.