Case law

Smith v. Public Employees Retirement Board

235 Or. App. 159 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 28, 2010

We understand petitioner’s argument to oppose the board’s interpretation and application of the rule in denying his request to redeposit funds into his variable account. In Jordan v. … See Robison Jewish Home v.

Campbell v. Board of Medical Examiners

16 Or. App. 381 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 11, 1974

Board of Medical Examiners v. Buck, 192 Or 66 , 232 P2d 791 (1951), 200 Or 488 , 258 P2d 124 (1953), appeal dis *387 missed 346 US 919 (1954); Board of Medical Examiners v. … As in Board of Medical Exammers v.

Brumnett v. Psychiatric Security Review Board

315 Or. 402 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 19, 1993

He was committed to the jurisdiction of the Psychiatric Security Review Board (PSRB) for 25 years. … Brumnett v. Psychiatric Security Review Board, 106 Or App 182 , 807 P2d 347 (1991). This court allowed review.

Fisher v. Board of Parole

338 Or. 374 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 5, 2005

110 P.3d 113 (2005) 338 Or. 374 FISHER v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION No. S52046. Supreme Court of Oregon. April 5, 2005 Petition for review denied.

Dawson/Fletcher v. Board of Parole

346 Or. 643 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 27, 2009

See Esperum v. Board of Parole, 296 Or 789, 796 , 681 P2d 1128 (1984) (so stating); Mastriano v. Board of Parole, 342 Or 684, 696 , 159 P3d 1151 (2007) (reaffirming that holding of Esperum). … E.g., Burden v.

Osborn v. Psychiatric Security Review Board

325 Or. 135 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 27, 1997

Relying on Hillman v. North. Wasco Co. PUD, 213 Or 264 , 323 P2d 664 (1958), overruled on other grounds by Maulding v. … Axis I consists of clinical syndromes and V Codes. For a definition of “V Codes,” see note 13, below. Axis II consists of developmental disorders and personality disorders.

Comley v. Emanuel Lutheran Charity Board

35 Or. App. 465 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 1, 1978

The Board and Drs. … Bacon v. Harris et al, 221 Or 553, 557 , 352 P2d 472 (1960). Under the Act, the Board is liable for certain of its torts for claims arising after July 1, 1968.

Bay v. State Board of Education

233 Or. 601 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 30, 1963

Richardson v. Neuner, 183 Or 558, 564 , 194 P2d 989 . … Leverich v. Frank, 6 Or 212 ; State v. Sing, 114 Or 267 , 229 P 921 .

Board of Medical Examiners v. Mintz

233 Or. 441 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 20, 1963

Blanchard, 138 Ark 137 , 211 SW 375 , 5 ALR 84 (1919); Hyatt v. Williams, 148 Cal 585, 84 P 41 (1906); Matthews v. Murphy, 23 Ky L Rep 750, 63 SW 785 (1901); Czarra v. … Board of Medical Ex-Supervisors, 25 App D C 443 (1905). ⑦ Warren v. Marion County, 222 Or 307 , 353 P2d 257 (1960).

Lenon v. Public Employees Retirement Board

228 Or. App. 20 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 29, 2009

Oregon Restaurant Services v. … S-W Floor Cover Shop v. Natl.

Jenkins v. Board of Parole

Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 18, 2014

In Dawson/Fletcher v. … Similarly, in Baker v.

Hayes v. Board of Parole

111 Or. App. 659 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 26, 1992

Beiswenger v. Psychiatric Security Review Board

192 Or. App. 38 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 4, 2004

It argues that, in Mueller v. … See, e.g., Windsor v. Judd, 321 Or 379, 387 , 898 P2d 761 (1995).

Hanson v. Psychiatric Security Review Board

156 Or. App. 198 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 30, 1998

Mueller v. PSRB, 325 Or 332, 339 , 937 P2d 1028 (1997). … However, in Osborn v.

Brown v. Miller

346 Or. App. 68 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 24, 2025

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF OREGON STEPHEN LEE BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. … Brown v. Miller, 336 Or App 460 (2024) (nonprecedential memorandum decision).

Hayes v. Board of Parole

115 Or. App. 36 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 26, 1992

See Owens v. Board of Parole, 113 Or App 507 , 834 P2d 547 (1992). We review for substantial evidence to support the Board’s findings and for errors of law. ORS 183.482(7), (8)(c). … The Board recited in its order that the victim was nine years old. Petitioner claims that the Board inappropriately applied the factor, because it relied solely on the victim’s age, contrary to Jarvis v.

Brown v. Insurance Co. of North America

93 Or. App. 355 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 12, 1988

Co. v. Bramwell, 108 Or 261, 277 , 217 P 332 (1923). … See State Farm Ins. v. Pohl, supra, 255 Or at 50 .

State Land Board v. United States

222 Or. 40 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 18, 1960

S. v. Gallagher, 97 F Sup 1014, 1015 (SD Cal 1951); U. S. v. Brown, 110 F Sup 370, 372 (SD Cal 1952); U. S. v. Peoples Nat. Bank of Chicago, 121 F Sup 331, 332 (ND Ill 1953); U. S. v. The Mid City Nat. … Dexter v. Hall, supra (21 L.ed at 77). In coming to his conclusion in U. S. v.

Martin v. Psychiatric Security Review Board

312 Or. 157 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 10, 1991

See OSAA v. … See Rolfe v.

Raridon v. Board of Parole

104 Or. App. 307 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 21, 1990

See Swift & Co. v. Peterson, 192 Or 97, 108-09 , 233 P2d 216 (1951). 3 She also argues that we must hold that the Board misinterpreted the rule, as a matter of law, and must remand the matter to it. … ORS 183.482(8) 4 prescribes our functions in reviewing the Board’s order. See 144.335(3); see also 1000 Friends of Oregon v. LCDC (Lane Co.), 305 Or 384, 388 , 752 P2d 271 (1988).