Case law

Ratley v. United States Postal Service

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 6, 2013

LCvR 7(b); see also Fox v. American Airlines, Inc., 389 F.3d 1291, 1294-95 (D.C. … Date: November 6, 2013 Ketanji Brown Jackson KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District Judge

Washington Terminal Co. v. Boswell

124 F.2d 235 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 18, 1941

Co. v. … Co. v. Spiller, 1927, 275 U.S. 156 , 48 S.Ct. 96 , 72 L.Ed. 214 . In Cook v.

Director, Office Of Workers' Compensation Programs, United States Department Of Labor, Petitioner v. Paul D. Berkstresser

921 F.2d 306 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 21, 1991

As the ALJ noted, adoption of the Board's position would be "tantamount to making middle age a prima facie pre-existing disability under Sec. 8(f)"; cf. General Dynamics Corp. v. … to canvass the entire job market.' " Stevens v.

Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Pan American World Airways, Inc. And Trans World Airlines, Inc., Intervenors. Master Executive Council of Trans World Airlines Pilots v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Trans World Airlines, Inc. And Pan American World Airways, Inc., Intervenors. United States of America v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Trans World Airlines, Inc. And Pan American World Airways, Inc., Intervenors

539 F.2d 748 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 30, 1976

As this court held in Air Line Pilots Ass'n, Int'l v. … Pan American World Airways, Inc. v. CAB, 104 U.S.App.D.C. 288, 290 , 261 F.2d 754, 756 (1958), cert. denied, sub nom. Seaboard & Western Airlines, Inc. v.

Saint Francis Medical Center v. Burwell

239 F. Supp. 3d 237 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 10, 2017

The appeals were all consolidated before the Board. … FCC v.

Loan Syndications & Trading Ass'n v. SEC. & Exch. Comm'n

882 F.3d 220 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 9, 2018

See, e.g., FDIC v. … Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Report to the Congress on Risk Retention 22– 23 (Oct. 2010) (“Board Report”).

Trailways of New England, Inc. v. United States

235 F. Supp. 509 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 2, 1964

See also Yale Transport Corp. v. United States, 210 F.Supp. 862, 864-865 (S.D.N.Y.1962) ; Capital Transit Co. v. United States, 97 F.Supp. 614, 618, 621 (D.D.C.1951). . Baltimore & Ohio R. Co. v. … National Labor Relations Board, 340 U.S. 474, 492-497 , 71 S.Ct. 456 , 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951); Federal Communications Comm’n v. Allentown Broadcasting Corp., 349 U.S. 358, 564-565 , 75 S.Ct. 855 , 99 L.Ed. 1147 (1955). .

Oglala Sioux Tribe v. NRC

45 F.4th 291 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 9, 2022

v. … Nevada v.

Swayne & Hoyt, Ltd. v. United States

18 F. Supp. 25 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 29, 1936

Menacho v. Ward (C.C.) 27 F. 529 . It is llo less so, under the provisions of the federal statute. In saying this, we are by no means unmindful of the problems of the American shipowner. … Precisely the same point was urged in Isbrandtsen-Moller Company, Inc., v. United States et al.

Aeron Marine Shipping Co. v. United States

695 F.2d 567 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 23, 1982

Sea-Land Service, Inc. v. Kreps, 566 F.2d 763, 773 (D.C.Cir.1977). … Federal Election Commission v. Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, 454 U.S. 27, 39 , 102 S.Ct. 38, 46 , 70 L.Ed.2d 23 (1981) (quoting Train v.

United States v. Rayburn House, Rm 2113, Washington, Dc

497 F.3d 654 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 3, 2007

See Brown & Williamson, 62 F.3d at 418 -19 (citing MINPECO, S.A. v. Conticommodity Servs., Inc., 844 F.2d 856, 857-59 (D.C.Cir.1988)). … v.

Walker v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

102 F. Supp. 2d 24 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 20, 2000

McDonnell, 411 U.S. at 802-805 , 93 S.Ct. 1817 ; Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 455 (D.C.Cir.1999) (emphasis added); Keith v. Duffey, 11 F.Supp.2d 46, 50 (D.D.C.1999); accord Nichols v. … Kilpatrick, 98 F.Supp.2d 9, 10 ; see also Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 456 (D.C.Cir.1999); Childers v. Slater, 44 F.Supp.2d 8, 19 (D.D.C.1999).

John S. Service v. John Foster Dulles

235 F.2d 215 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 14, 1956

. * * * ” The Supreme Court, in Peters v. … It is only fair to add that since the finding of the Review Board is a nullity, and since appellant’s discharge is sustained only under Public Law 188, the following quotation from note 2 in Scher v.

Mitchell v. Del Toro

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 26, 2024

special board.” … Circuit has concluded that the statute governing “[c]orrection of military records,” 10 U.S.C. § 1552(a), “fairly exudes deference” to the Secretary and the Board. Kreis v.

Gerald Brent Fagan v. National Cash Register Company

481 F.2d 1115 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 21, 1973

Cleveland Board of Education (6 Cir. 1972), 465 F.2d 1184 , saw invidious discrimination based on sex because of enforced maternity leave without pay. The Fifth Circuit in 1971 saw sex discrimination in Danner v. … Clones (7 Cir. 1970), 432 F.2d 1259 ; Stull v. School Board of Western Beaver Jr.-Sr. High School (3 Cir. 1972), 459 F.2d 339 , with its recognition of the conflicts in various courts. . See, a. g., Freeman v.

Breakfield v. Holder

District Court, District of Columbia · May 11, 2015

Hagans v. Lavine, 415 U.S. 528, 536-37 (1974) (quoting Newburyport Water Co. v. Newburyport, 193 U.S. 561, 579 (1904)); accord Tooley v. Napolitano, 586 F.3d 1006, 1009 (D.C. … Date: May 11, 2015 Ketanji Brown Jackson KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District Judge

On Petition to Amend Rule 1 of the Rules Governing the Bar

431 A.2d 521 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 5, 1981

Judge KELLY concurs in this opinion except for Part V thereof. . There are three categories of membership in our unified (or mandatory) bar: active, inactive, and judicial. The total membership is approximately 34,000. … See, e. g., Abood v. Detroit Board of Education, 431 U.S. 209 , 97 S.Ct. 1782 , 52 L.Ed.2d 261 (1977). The implementation of Referendum No. 2, however, will moot this problem. .

Project for Privacy and Surveillance Accountability, Inc. v. Office of the Director of National Intelligence

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 2, 2025

Blackwell v. FBI, 646 F.3d 37, 42 (D.C. Cir. 2011) (quoting Mayer Brown LLP v. IRS, 562 F.3d 1190, 1194 (D.C. Cir. 2009)). … Mayer Brown, 562 F.3d at 1194 n.1; see also PHE, Inc. v. DOJ, 983 F.2d 248, 251–52 (D.C.

Kenhan v. United States

263 A.2d 253 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 24, 1970

Accord, Waterstaat v. United States, D.C.App., 252 A.2d 507 (1969). Affirmed. 1 . … See Brown v. United States, 58 App.D.C. 311 , 30 F.2d 474 (1929).

Chaplaincy of Full Gospel Churches v. England

221 F.R.D. 255 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 6, 2004

1 Adair v. … Camm v.