Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersME

9,550 results

2.25s

  • Monsen v. State of Maine Bureau of Motor Vehicles

    Superior Court of Maine · Jan 5, 2024

    Doane v. HHS, 2021 ME 28, { 38, 250 A.3d 1101 (quoting Friends of Lincoln Lakes v, Bd. of Env't Prot., 2010 ME 18, | 13, 989 A.2d 1128). … (quoting International Paper Co. v. Board of Envtl. Protection, 1999 ME 135, { 29, 737 A.2d 1047). A court will not reverse an agency decision merely in the face of inconsistent evidence. Seider v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • T.D. Bank v. Leasure

    Superior Court of Maine · Feb 23, 2011

    Plaintiff, v. DAVID D. LEASURE and TERI L. … Moulton v. Brown, 627 A.2d 521, 523 (Me. 1993). The Defendant asserts that he believed that he was represented by the attorney that he had engaged to represent him in his bankruptcy proceedings.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Perkins v. Town of Searsport

    Superior Court of Maine · Aug 23, 2000

    The Court relied on Russell: v. Brown, 63 Me. 203 (1873) which, like the case at bar, involved a wall. The argument in Jacques and Russell make clear that one threshold question is “abatability”. … See Harrisonville v. W.S.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Leighton v. Town of Waterboro

    Superior Court of Maine · May 4, 2005

    Leighton appealed to the Waterboro Zoning Board of Appeals (ZBA), which upheld the CEO's denial. … Portland v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Stewart Title of N. New England v. Pike

    Superior Court of Maine · Mar 11, 2003

    Liseea 2 Plaintiff MAR £4 2005 V. … Hall v. Board of Environmental Protection, 498 A.2d 260, 266 (Me. 1985). See also Heber v. Lucerne-in Maine Village Co., 2000 ME 137,97, 755 A.2d 1064, 1066.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Booklocker. Com, Inc. v. Amazon. Com, Inc.

    650 F. Supp. 2d 89 · District Court, D. Maine · Aug 26, 2009

    V. … No. 2 v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Trawler Jeanne D'Arc, Inc. v. Casco Trawlers, Inc.

    260 F. Supp. 124 · District Court, D. Maine · Sep 30, 1966

    Buntin v. Fletchas, 257 F.2d 512, 513 (5th Cir. 1958); International Mercantile Marine S.S. Co. v. W. & A. Fletcher Co., 296 F. 855 (2d Cir. 1924). The applicable principles were stated by the court in Buntin v. … The court in Buntin v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • State of Maine v. White

    Superior Court of Maine · Jun 9, 2015

    CR-14-013 STATE OF MAINE v. ORDER DORIAN WHITE, Defendant Before the court is Defendant's omnibus motion to suppress evidence. … Agreeing that under the "fellow officer rule," Whiteley v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • State v. Willoughby

    507 A.2d 1060 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 9, 1986

    State v. Conlogue, 474 A.2d at 172 ; cf. State v. … Therefore, Board of Bar Overseers v. Dineen, 481 A.2d 499 (Me.1984) can immediately be distinguished because the prosecutor here did inform the court of the falsity of the potential witness’s testimony.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • Locke v. Karass

    382 F. Supp. 2d 181 · District Court, D. Maine · Aug 2, 2005

    In Local No. 1 v. … Rushia v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • United States v. Spring

    886 F. Supp. 2d 37 · District Court, D. Maine · Aug 9, 2012

    See Teague v. … Clay v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Adams v. Bowater Inc.

    292 F. Supp. 2d 191 · District Court, D. Maine · Dec 3, 2003

    Adams v. Bowa-ter Inc., 313 F.3d 611 (1st Cir.2002). Before the Court now are Plaintiffs’ and Defendants’ motions for summary judgment. … In support of their argument, Defendants continue to cite two cases, Dade v. North American Philips Corp., 68 F.3d 1558 (3d Cir.1995) and Andes v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Inh. of the Town of Burlington v. Eaton

    Superior Court of Maine · Jul 27, 2009

    Vienna v. Kokernak, 612 A.2d 870, 874 (Me. 1992). … Yusem v. Town ofRaymond, 2001 ME 61, ~ 9, 769 A.2d 865, 870.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • New England Guar. Ins. Co., Inc. v. Masciadri

    Superior Court of Maine · Feb 23, 2011

    Heber v. LlICeme-i/1-Mai71C Village Corp., 2000 ME 137, <IT 7, 755 A.2d 1064, 1066 (quoting McAfee v. Cole, 637 A.2d 463,465 (Me. 1994)). … Brown v. Crown Equip. Corp., 2008 ME 186, 114, 960 A.2d 1188, 1193.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Glidden v. Belden

    684 A.2d 1306 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 4, 1996

    Noyes v. … Martin v. Brown, 650 A.2d 937, 939 (Me.1994) (quoting Chase v. Cochran, 102 Me. 431, 437 , 67 A. 320, 322 (1907)).

    Cited 42 timesPublished
  • Milliken v. Chapman

    75 Me. 306 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 26, 1883

    McCobb v. Richardson, 24 Maine, 82. … Cr oss v. Peters, 1 Maine, 376; Hammatt v. Emerson, 27 Maine, 308, 326, 327; Hanson v. Edgerly, 29 N. H. 343; Ward v. Hobbs, Ct. of Appeals, 3 Q. B. Div. 150; Burgess v. Chapin, 5 B. I. 225; Dambmann v. Schulting, 75 N.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Jarvis v. Jarvis

    821 A.2d 913 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 16, 2003

    Curtis v. … Dargie v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • SOSTAK v. DAPRATO

    District Court, D. Maine · Sep 26, 2024

    See Brown v. Dash, No. 20-10980-FDS, 2020 WL 6806433, at * 6 (D. … Cossart v. United Excel Corp., 804 F.3d 13, 20 (1st Cir. 2015) (quoting Goodyear Dunlop Tires Operations, S.A. v. Brown, 564 U.S. 915, 919 (2011)).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Tardy v. Maine Unemployment Ins. Comm'n

    Superior Court of Maine · Sep 21, 2010

    Board ofExaminers ofExaminers ofPsychologists, 2000 ME 206, ,-r 8, 695 A.2d 552, 555 ("The standard of review [on M.R. Civ. … Brent Leasing Co. v. State Tax Assessor, 2001 ME 90, '116, 773 A.2d 457,459.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • State of Maine v. Alexandre

    Superior Court of Maine · May 16, 2003

    Brown, Esq., for the Defendant and Assistant Attorney General, Fernald LaRochelle for the State. For the following reasons the Court denies the Defendant’s motion. … See State v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.