Case law

Breakfield v. Holder

District Court, District of Columbia · May 11, 2015

Hagans v. Lavine, 415 U.S. 528, 536-37 (1974) (quoting Newburyport Water Co. v. Newburyport, 193 U.S. 561, 579 (1904)); accord Tooley v. Napolitano, 586 F.3d 1006, 1009 (D.C. … Date: May 11, 2015 Ketanji Brown Jackson KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District Judge

On Petition to Amend Rule 1 of the Rules Governing the Bar

431 A.2d 521 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 5, 1981

Judge KELLY concurs in this opinion except for Part V thereof. . There are three categories of membership in our unified (or mandatory) bar: active, inactive, and judicial. The total membership is approximately 34,000. … See, e. g., Abood v. Detroit Board of Education, 431 U.S. 209 , 97 S.Ct. 1782 , 52 L.Ed.2d 261 (1977). The implementation of Referendum No. 2, however, will moot this problem. .

Kenhan v. United States

263 A.2d 253 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 24, 1970

Accord, Waterstaat v. United States, D.C.App., 252 A.2d 507 (1969). Affirmed. 1 . … See Brown v. United States, 58 App.D.C. 311 , 30 F.2d 474 (1929).

Gilles v. Touchstone

676 F. Supp. 341 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 19, 1987

See Carpenter v. D.C. Traffic Adjudication Appeal Board, 530 A.2d 680 (D.C.1987); Stowell v. D.C. Department of Transportation, 514 A.2d 438 (D.C.1986); District of Columbia v. Sullivan, 436 A.2d 364 (D.C.1981). 2 . … Hackers’ License Appeal Board, 384 A.2d 421, 425 (D.C.1978); Richards v. D.C. Hackers’ License Appeal Board, 357 A.2d 439 , 440 n. 1 (D.C.1976). 3 .

Rice v. Dean

District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 22, 2025

v. … Brown v. Dalton, No. 96-5285, 1997 WL 362505, at *1 (D.C. Cir. May 5, 1997) (per curiam) (citations omitted). II.

Butler v. United States

388 A.2d 883 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 23, 1978

Brown v. United States, D.C.App., 379 A.2d 708 (1977). … We reiterate our holding in Brown v. United States, supra, that the ten-day rule is jurisdictional, and that Fallen permits departure under only the most compelling of circumstances.

United States v. Holton

122 F. Supp. 2d 21 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 27, 2000

Government’s use of Detective Brown Detective Brown testified for the government in petitioner’s trial. In February 2000, Detective Brown pleaded guilty to perjuring his academic credentials. See United States v. … Brown, Criminal No. 00-35 HHK (D.D.C.).

M. A. Schapiro & Co. v. Securities & Exchange Commission

339 F. Supp. 467 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 24, 1972

In Bristol-Myers Co. v. … [Bristol-Myers Co. v. F. T. C., swpra.'] This exemption was considered in Grumman Aircraft Engineering Corp. v. Renegotiation Board, 138 U.S.App.D.C. 147 , 425 F.2d 578 (1970).

International Union of Electronic, Electrical, Salaried, MacHine and Furniture Workers, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, Lawrence R. Ferriso, Intervenor. Lawrence R. Ferriso v. National Labor Relations Board, International Union of Electronic, Electrical, Salaried, MacHine and Furniture Workers, Afl-Cio, Intervenor. Engineers Union, Local 444, International Union of Electronic, Electrical, Salaried, MacHine and Furniture Workers, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, International Union of Electronic, Electrical, Salaried, MacHine and Furniture Workers, Afl-Cio Lawrence R. Ferriso, Intervenors

41 F.3d 1532 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 16, 1994

See Air Line Pilots Ass'n, Int'l v. … And, as the Supreme Court held in NLRB v.

Trustees of the Electrical Workers Local No. 26 Pension Trust Fund v. Trust Fund Advisors, Inc.

266 F.R.D. 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 12, 2010

. & Title Co. v. … See United States v.

United States v. Zabavsky

District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 22, 2022

Hylton-Brown was “justified, excused, or committed under recognized circumstances of mitigation.” Comber v. … Hylton-Brown’s death. See United States v. Apodaca, 287 F.

Heller Bros. Co. v. Lind

86 F.2d 862 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 9, 1936

Co. v. State Corp. Comm., 236 U.S. 699 , 35 S.Ct. 480 , 59 L.Ed. 797 ; United States v. Los Angeles & S. L. R. Co., 273 U.S. 299, 314 , 47 S.Ct. 413, 416 , 71 L.Ed. 651 ; Federal Trade Comm. v. … Affirmed. 1 Bradley Lumber Company v. National Labor Relations Board (C.C.A.) 84 F. (2d) 97, certiorari refused October 12, 1936, 57 S.Ct. 21 , 81 L.Ed. —.

Kalantar v. Lufthansa German Airlines

276 F. Supp. 2d 5 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 10, 2003

Dec. 21, 1993) (plaintiff injured while waiting for shuttle bus was not embarking as she was still in a public area, and not close to boarding); Kantonides v. … But see Baker v.

Whiteru v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 14, 2020

Brown has no independent memory of conducting those particular inspections (see Pls.’ … District of Columbia v. Brown, 589 A.2d 384, 388 (D.C. 1991) (quoting Aqui v. Isaac, 342 A.2d 370, 371–72 (D.C. 1975)).

Weeks v. United States ex rel. Creary

277 F. 594 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 3, 1922

Wilcox v. Jackson, 13 Pet. 498 , 513: United States v. Eliason, 16 Pot. 291, 302; Confiscation Cases, 20 Wall. 92, 109 ; United States v. Farden, 99 U. S. 10, 19 ; Wolsey v. Chapman, 101 U. … In Marbury v. Madison, 1 Cranch, 137 , 2 L.

Bell v. Ivory

966 F. Supp. 23 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 11, 1997

Moss v. Stockard, 580 A.2d 1011, 1024 (D.C.1990). … Sorrells v. Garfinckel's, 565 A.2d 285, 289 (D.C.1989); Alfred A. Altimont, Inc. v.

Frazier v. Silver

185 F. Supp. 625 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 18, 1960

Coleman v. Godsey, 1957, 102 U.S.App.D.C. 7 , 249 F.2d 522 . … It might be wise also for the Board in future cases to look a little more carefully at the procedural requirements outlined in Coffey v. Jordan, 1959, 107 U.S.App.D.C. 113 , 275 F.2d 1 , and to follow them.

In Re Youmans

617 A.2d 534 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 15, 1993

Before us is a report and recommendation of the Board on Professional Responsibility that respondent be disbarred both on the basis of the imposition of reciprocal discipline under D.C.Bar R. … The Board noted further that New Jersey courts have described the offense covered by the theft by deception statute as one involving fraud, State v. Rodgers, 230 N.J.Super. 593 , 554 A.2d 866, 870 (App.Div.)

In Re Owusu

886 A.2d 536 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 10, 2005

*538 FARRELL, Associate Judge: The Board on Professional Responsibility (the Board), having found that respondent Jacob Q. … In a recent case, Sitcov v. District of Columbia Bar, No. 05-BG-258, 885 A.2d 289 , 2005 D.C.App. Lexis 529 (D.C. October 20, 2005), we similarly held that suspension of an attorney for nonpayment of Bar dues under D.C.

Fain v. Islamic Republic of Iran

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 31, 2012

.); O’Brien v. Islamic Republic of Iran, 2012 WL 1021471 (D.D.C. 2012) (Lamberth, C.J.); Davis v. Islamic Republic of Iran, 2012 WL 1059700 (D.D.C. 2012) (Lamberth, C.J.); Estate of Brown v. … Mar. 28, 2012), 2012 WL 1021471; Davis v. Islamic Republic of Iran, No. 07-cv-1302 (D.D.C. Mar. 30, 2012), 2012 WL 1059700; Estate of Brown v. Islamic Republic of Iran, No. 08-cv-531 (D.D.C.