Case law

In re Certain Carriers

240 F. Supp. 290 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 5, 1965

In an action to impeach the award, this Court sustained the award, Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen and Enginemen v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Co., 225 F.Supp. 11 . … Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen and Enginemen v. Certain Carriers, etc., 118 U.S.App.D.C. 100 , 331 F.2d 1020 . . 377 U.S. 918 , 84 S.Ct. 1181 , 12 L.Ed.2d 187 .

Wood v. Neuman

979 A.2d 64 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 27, 2009

Henson v. … Huber v.

Cochrane v. Wynne

541 F. Supp. 2d 267 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 31, 2008

Piersall v. Winter, 435 F.3d 319, 325 (D.C.Cir.2006). Decisions of a military records correction board “can be set aside if they are arbitrary, capricious, or not based on substantial evidence.” Chappell v. … See Haselrig v.

Matter of Washington

513 A.2d 245 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 6, 1986

See Caravel Office Building Co. v. Peruvian Air Attache, 347 A.2d 280, 283 (D.C.1976); see also Briggs v. Goodwin, 186 U.S. … See Board Rule 7.2, note 11 supra.

Brawner Building, Inc. v. R. Roderick Shehyn, Walter E. Washington, Commissioner, District of Columbia

442 F.2d 847 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 23, 1971

The Board’s decisions are subject to review in the District Court. McCloskey v. Scrivener, 238 F.Supp. 497 (D.D.C.1965). … Connor v.

Craig v. United States

490 A.2d 1173 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 25, 1985

Hagner v. United States, 285 U.S. 427, 431 , 52 S.Ct. 417, 419 , 76 L.Ed.2d 861 (1932); Hackney v. … In United States v.

Walker v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

102 F. Supp. 2d 24 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 20, 2000

McDonnell, 411 U.S. at 802-805 , 93 S.Ct. 1817 ; Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 455 (D.C.Cir.1999) (emphasis added); Keith v. Duffey, 11 F.Supp.2d 46, 50 (D.D.C.1999); accord Nichols v. … Kilpatrick, 98 F.Supp.2d 9, 10 ; see also Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 456 (D.C.Cir.1999); Childers v. Slater, 44 F.Supp.2d 8, 19 (D.D.C.1999).

Saturn Airways, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Dan-Air Services, Ltd., Intervenors. Lynn Michelle Tschirhart and Paul Jeffrey Tschirhart v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Americans for Charter Travel, Intervenors. National Air Carrier Association, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Dan-Air Services, Ltd., Intervenors. Transworld Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Lynn M. Tschirhart, Intervenors. Pan American World Airways Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, National Air Carrier Association, Inc., Intervenors. American Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, National Air Carrier Association, Inc., Intervenors. American Society of Travel Agents, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, National Air Carrier Association, Inc. And Overseas National Airways, Inc., Saturn Airways, Inc., Intervenors. Master Executive Council of the Air Line Pilots in the Employ of United Air Lines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, National Air Carrier Association, Inc., Intervenors

483 F.2d 1284 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 11, 1973

NATIONAL AIR CARRIER ASSOCIATION, INC., et al., Petitioners, v. CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD, Respondent, Dan-Air Services, Ltd., et al., Intervenors. TRANSWORLD AIRLINES, INC., Petitioner, v. … CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD, Respondent, Lynn M. Tschirhart et al., Intervenors. PAN AMERICAN WORLD AIRWAYS INC., Petitioner, v.

Leedom v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, Local Union No. 108

278 F.2d 237 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 24, 1960

National Labor Relations Board v. … to the union); National Labor Relations Board v.

Ortiz-Diaz v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development

867 F.3d 70 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 2, 2016

Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 457 (D.C. Cir. 1999). The district court granted summary judgment to the Department on the ground that Ortiz-Diaz failed to show that he suffered an adverse employment action. … Brown, 199 F.3d at 457 ; see also Stewart, 352 F.3d at 426 .

In Re Lenoir

585 A.2d 771 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 17, 1991

Bar Counsel points out that a three year statute of limitations would have applied to Holley v. … The Board, however, recommends that these two charges be dismissed due to a lack of clear and convincing proof. We agree with the Board’s recommendation as to these two charges.

S. S. W., Inc. v. Air Transport Ass'n of America

191 F.2d 658 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 12, 1951

Nor does the fact that Board approval of the agreements and understandings charged in the complaint has not yet been obtained alter our conclusion. As the Supreme Court said in U. S. Navigation Co. v. Cunard S. S. … See Terminal Warehouse v. Pennsylvania R. Co., 1936, 297 U.S. 560 , 513-514, 56 S.Ct. 546 , 80 L.Ed. 827 . . Keogh v. Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co., 1922, 260 U.S. 156, 162 , 43 S.Ct. 47 , 67 L.Ed. 183 . . Georgia v.

Nelson v. Nelson

379 A.2d 713 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 31, 1977

Spence v. Spence, D.C. App., 266 A.2d 29 (1970). … Compare, e.g., Brown v.

Vermont Information Processing, Inc. v. NLRB

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 26, 2026

But the Board did not cite this reasoning below and therefore cannot raise it now. See SEC v. … v.

Speelman v. United States

461 F. Supp. 2d 71 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 15, 2006

Kowal v. MCI Communications Corp., 16 F.3d at 1276 ; see also Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d at 242 ; Sparrow v. United Air Lines, Inc., 216 F.3d 1111, 1113 (D.C.Cir.2000); Harris v. … See Kowal v. MCI Communications Corp., 16 F.3d at 1276 ; Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d at 242 . II. DISCUSSION A.

United States v. Barnes

496 A.2d 1040 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 16, 1985

See Brown v. Texas, 443 U.S. 47, 51-52 , 99 S.Ct. 2637, 2640-2641 , 61 L.Ed.2d 357 (1979) (no justification for seizing appellant seen walking away from another man in alley in area known for drug traffic); Robinson v. … United States v.

Butler v. United States

388 A.2d 883 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 23, 1978

Brown v. United States, D.C.App., 379 A.2d 708 (1977). … We reiterate our holding in Brown v. United States, supra, that the ten-day rule is jurisdictional, and that Fallen permits departure under only the most compelling of circumstances.

Keyes v. Madsen

179 F.2d 40 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 3, 1950

Co. v. City of St. Louis, 8 Cir., 1933, 64 F.2d 921, 929 , certiorari denied 1933, 290 U.S. 668 , 54 S.Ct. 88 , 78 L.Ed. 577 ; Southwestern Oil Co. v. … Case v.

Hyman G. Gottlieb v. Federico F. Pena, Secretary of Transportation, Robert L. Gazlay v. Federico F. Pena, Secretary of Transportation

41 F.3d 730 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 6, 1994

Gazlay v. Busey, 819 F.Supp. at 31 . In Gazlay v. Busey, the district court relied on language in Brock v. … Gazlay’s contention that the Board’s final decision was arbitrary because it was made solely to avoid establishing a precedent that would result in a flood of applications to the Board is unpersuasive. See Gazlay v.

Burton v. Office of Employee Appeals

30 A.3d 789 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 3, 2011

Hoey appealed to the Superior Court, which affirmed the Board’s decision, and this appeal followed. B. Appellant Burton The facts in Burton v. OEA are similar to those in Hoey v. OEA and we summarize them only briefly. … Loudermill, 470 U.S. 532, 538 , 105 S.Ct. 1487 , 84 L.Ed.2d 494 (1985) (quoting Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972)).