Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filters1934

10,000+ results

1.20s

  • Katherine Gardenhire and Walter Gardenhire v. Donald Schubert, in His Individual and Official Capacity as Chief of Police

    205 F.3d 303 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Mar 2, 2000

    The affirmative defense of qualified, or good faith, immunity shields “government officials performing discretionary functions ... from liability for civil damages insofar as their conduct does not violate ‘clearly established … Where a defendant moves for summary judgment based on qualified immunity, the plaintiff must first identify a clearly established right alleged to have been violated and second, establish that a reasonable officer in the

    Cited 466 timesPublished
  • Hodgson v. Mississippi Department of Corrections

    963 F. Supp. 776 · District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · Apr 30, 1997

    The Defendants, however, insist that this claim be dismissed on the ground that they are entitled to qualified immunity from suit. 13 Government officials may raise qualified immunity as an affirmative defense to actions … Once a defendant has raised a qualified immunity defense, the plaintiff bears the burden of demonstrating the violation of a clearly established right. See Kernats, 35 F.3d at 1176 (citing Rakovich, 850 F.2d at 1209 ).

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Bird v. State Through Corbin

    170 Ariz. 20 · Court of Appeals of Arizona · Nov 21, 1991

    and (2) qualified immunity, which is available for nondiscretionary acts. … The licensing and regulation of any profession or occupation falls within the grant of absolute immunity, not qualified immunity.

    Cited 19 timesPublished
  • Tenenbaum v. Williams

    193 F.3d 581 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Oct 13, 1999

    Government officials “enjoy qualified immunity when they perform discretionary functions if either (1) their conduct did not violate clearly established rights of which a reasonable person would have known, or (2) it was … Whatever van Emrik “clearly established” therefore could not have guided the behavior of the individual defendants here and they are entitled to qualified immunity, as the district court held. IV.

    Cited 486 timesPublished
  • Mejia v. City of New York

    119 F. Supp. 2d 232 · District Court, E.D. New York · Oct 5, 2000

    Qualified Immunity The basic test for determining whether a public official is entitled to assert qualified immunity was established by the Supreme Court in Harlow v. … : qualified immunity shields public officials “from liability for civil damages insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known

    Cited 89 timesPublished
  • Patricia McCardle Plaintiff-Appellant-Cross-Appellee v. Jonathan Haddad, Defendant-Appellee-Cross-Appellant

    131 F.3d 43 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Nov 21, 1997

    Qualified Immunity Haddad’s “alternative! … Qualified immunity, which shields government officials performing discretionary functions “from liability for civil damages insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights

    Cited 143 timesPublished
  • Teresa Garcia, a Minor, by Her Next Friends Max and Sandra Garcia v. Theresa Miera, J.D. Sanchez, Edward Leyba, Judi Mestas, and Felix Duran

    817 F.2d 650 · Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · Apr 28, 1987

    . § 1983 by qualified immunity. … Determination of qualified immunity is now to be based “on the objective reasonableness of an official’s conduct, as measured by reference to clearly established law.” Harlow, 457 U.S. at 818 , 102 S.Ct. at 2738 .

    Cited 139 timesPublished
  • Ratté v. Corrigan

    989 F. Supp. 2d 550 · District Court, E.D. Michigan · Nov 26, 2013

    Hartsfield is not entitled to qualified immunity Hartsfield contends that, to the extent she is not absolutely immune, she is entitled to qualified immunity. She is mistaken. … When government officials perform discretionary functions, they are immune from suit through qualified immunity “insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Mearday v. City of Chicago

    196 F. Supp. 2d 700 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Mar 28, 2002

    Qualified Immunity Qualified immunity shields those government officials performing discretionary functions “insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable … At the second step of the qualified immunity analysis, the burden of demonstrating a clearly established constitutional right lies with the plaintiff.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Calderón-Garnier v. Sánchez-Ramos

    439 F. Supp. 2d 229 · District Court, D. Puerto Rico · Jun 12, 2006

    Qualified Immunity The defendants argue that they are entitled to qualified immunity. … Government officials are immune from suit when their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory authority or constitutional rights a reasonable person should have known of at the time of the conduct at issue.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Sythe v. City of Eureka

    78 F. Supp. 2d 1050 · District Court, N.D. California · Jan 28, 2000

    QUALIFIED IMMUNITY AND FALSE ARREST Government officials performing their discretionary duties are entitled to qualified immunity unless their conduct violates “clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which … ANALYSIS For this Court to find qualified immunity for the individual officers in the case at bar, it must reach two conclusions: First, that the law governing the officers’ conduct was clearly established; and second, under

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Elder v. Holloway

    874 F. Supp. 278 · District Court, D. Idaho · Jan 31, 1995

    The Positions Taken by the Parties In support of his motion for summary judgment, Defendant Holloway essentially contends that he is entitled to qualified immunity based on the fact that: (1) the law was not so clearly established … Thus, in reconsidering the qualified immunity issue herein in light of Alr-Azzawy and all other relevant authority, this court finds that Defendant Holloway is entitled to qualified immunity because the law was not clearly

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Cofield v. Randolph County Commission

    844 F. Supp. 1499 · District Court, M.D. Alabama · Jan 31, 1994

    A state actor is entitled to qualified immunity from civil damages as long as the official could reasonably believe that his or her conduct did not violate a clearly established constitutional right. Harlow v. … Because qualified immunity is rarely established upon a motion to dismiss and because insufficient information is contained in the complaint to establish the affirmative defense of qualified immunity, the court finds that

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • US ex rel. Citynet, LLC v. Jimmy Gianato

    962 F.3d 154 · Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · Jun 22, 2020

    actions had violated a clearly established right. … Thus, the state of mind required to establish liability under the FCA is also sufficient to preclude immunity protection, and therefore immunity cannot protect a public official from a suit alleging a claim under the FCA

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Dempsey v. Denver Police Department

    353 P.3d 928 · Colorado Court of Appeals · May 21, 2015

    hazards" as "rain, fog, smoke, crowded traffic conditions, or many pedestrians crossing and re-crossing the roadway, perhaps unlawfully, after a parade, or the like," and noting that those kinds of conditions had not been established … zone from so qualifying.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Jones v. Lieber

    579 F. Supp. 2d 175 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 30, 2008

    By definition, qualified immunity is not absolute. … However, “[a] plaintiff who seeks damages for violation of constitutional or statutory rights may overcome the defendant official’s qualified immunity only by showing that those rights were clearly established at the time

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Karl v. City of Mountlake Terrace

    678 F.3d 1062 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · May 8, 2012

    Discussion The doctrine of qualified immunity protects government officials ‘from liability for civil damages insofar as their con- duct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitu- tional rights of which … We exercise our discretion to consider prong one of the qualified immunity analysis first.

    Cited 92 timesPublished
  • John Lauro, Jr. v. Michael Charles, the City of New York and the Police Department of the City of New York

    219 F.3d 202 · Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · Jul 28, 2000

    But we also hold that, because the Fourth Amendment right at issue was not clearly established until today’s decision, the defendant police officer in this case is entitled to qualified immunity. … Accordingly, we hold that, because the unconstitutionality of the staged perp walk was, until today, not clearly established, Detective Charles is entitled to qualified immunity for his participation in the perp walk.

    Cited 105 timesPublished
  • Richard Burton v. Arkansas Secretary of State

    737 F.3d 1219 · Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · Dec 17, 2013

    A government official is entitled to qualified immunity "from liability in a § 1983 action unless the official's conduct violates a clearly established constitutional or statutory right of which a reasonable person would … DeKalb Cnty., 62 F.3d 338, 340 (11th Cir. 1995) (reversing denial of qualified immunity on equal-protection retaliation claim because there is "no clearly established right . . . under the equal protection clause to be free

    Cited 52 timesPublished
  • Duran v. City of Douglas

    904 F.2d 1372 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jun 4, 1990

    However, the Supreme Court has established a limited exception to this rule: “[A] district court’s denial of a claim of qualified immunity, to the extent that it turns on an issue of law, is an appealable ‘final decision’ … The legal issues involved in that appeal — whether Aguilar violated clearly established constitutional protections — are identical to those governing the question of Aguilar’s qualified immunity.

    Cited 63 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.