Case law

M.K. v. Tenet

99 F. Supp. 2d 12 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 23, 2000

Civ.P.4(m); see, e.g., Claasen v. Brown, 1996 WL 79490 , *2 (D.D.C.1996) (dismissing action for plaintiffs’ failure to serve process within the time provided under Rule 4(m)). … See Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 575 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972); O’Donnell v. Barry, 148 F.3d 1126, 1139 (D.C.Cir.1998).

Ellison v. United States

919 A.2d 612 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 29, 2007

Brown v. United States, 795 A.2d 56, 63 (D.C.2002) (quoting Gardner v. United States, 698 A.2d 990 , 1002 *615 (D.C.1997)); see also Owens v. … Blackledge v. United States, 871 A.2d 1193, 1196 (D.C.2005); Spain v. United States, 665 A.2d 658 , 662 n. 5 (D.C.1995).

Compania Cervecera de Puerto Rico, Inc. v. NLRB

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 5, 2025

We afford the Board’s finding of anti-union motivation a “very high degree of deference,” Hosp. de la Concepcion v. NLRB, 106 F.4th 69, 76 (D.C. … Response of Conn., Inc. v. NLRB, 93 F.4th 491, 496 (D.C. Cir. 2024) (“Courts and the Board are bound to enforce lawful labor agreements as written.”)

Timothy Jenkins v. Howard University

123 F.4th 1343 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 20, 2024

Caterpillar Inc. v. … In fairness, the charter does vest the Board with governing authority and require the Board to enact lawful bylaws.

DEMOCRATIC STATE COMMITTEE v. Bebchick

706 A.2d 569 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 15, 1998

Carr v. Brown, 395 A.2d 79, 84 (D.C.1978). See also W. Page Keeton et al., ProsseR and Keeton on the Law of Torts § 130 (5th ed.1984). … Federated Dep’t Stores v.

Robinson v. United States

355 A.2d 567 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 2, 1976

Hence, the frisk was lawful under Sibron v. State of New York, supra; Terry v. Ohio, supra; and Adams v. Williams, supra. … Appellant is a Negro male and was wearing a red jacket and brown or reddish-brown pants. 3 .

George v. Local Union No. 639, International Brotherhood of Teamsters

825 F. Supp. 328 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 8, 1993

. § 411 (a)(2); see also International Organization of Masters, Mates & Pilots v. Brown, 498 U.S. 466 , 111 S.Ct. 880 , 112 L.Ed.2d 991 (1991); Carothers v. Presser, 818 F.2d 926, 929 (D.C.Cir.1987). … See Bright v.

Putman v. Dudas

539 F. Supp. 2d 414 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 28, 2008

See Monsanto Co. v. Kamp, 269 F.Supp. 818, 822 (D.D.C.1967). The “thrust” of the action “is that the decision of the board is erroneous on the facts, the law, or both.” Fregeau v. … Standard Havens v. Manbeck, 1994 U.S. Dist.

United States v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.

310 F. Supp. 2d 68 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 17, 2004

See INS v. … Defendants’ Reliance on FDA v. Brown & Williamson Is Misplaced Defendants rely heavily on Brown & Williamson. In that case, the Supreme *74 Court held that the FDA lacks authority to regulate tobacco products.

Hilyer v. Morrison-Knudsen Construction Co.

670 F.2d 208 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 1, 1981

Leslie v. Reynolds, 179 Kan. 422 , 295 P.2d 1076, 1083 (1956). . In W. W. Cross v. … Similarly, in Newport News Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co. v.

United States v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.

337 F. Supp. 2d 15 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 10, 2004

See Hunt v. … See Tower v.

Poindexter v. D.C. Department of Corrections

891 F. Supp. 2d 117 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 20, 2012

Comm 'rs of Bryan Cnty. v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 403-04 (1997). … Brown, 520 U.S. at 418; Daskalea v. Dist. of Columbia, 227 F.3d 433, 441 (D.C. Cir. 2000) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted).

In Re: Navy Chaplaincy

69 F. Supp. 3d 249 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 26, 2014

Adair v. England, 183 F. … Rotella v.

Miller v. Johnson

541 F. Supp. 1165 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 8, 1982

See also Board of County Commissioners v. Howard, 640 P.2d 1128 (Colo.1982). … An opinion by Justice Todd in Brown v.

Amalgamated Meat Cutters & Butcher Workmen v. Connally

337 F. Supp. 737 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 22, 1971

GARRY BROWN. LAWRENCE G. WILLIAMS. CHALMERS P. WYLIE. MARGARET M. HECKLER. WILLIAM O. COWELR. PHILIP M. CRANE. CLARK MacGREGOR. … The power is exercised entirely at the discretion of the local board.

Aero Mayflower Transit Company, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Commission

711 F.2d 224 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 17, 1983

The latter motion apparently was filed after the Review Board had already promulgated its initial decision. … CAB, 126 U.S.App.D.C. 399, 411-412 , 379 F.2d 453, 465-466 (1967); Brown Telecasters v.

Federal Trade Commission v. Sysco Corporation

113 F. Supp. 3d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 26, 2015

Id at 713 (citing Brown Shoe Co. v. United States, 370 U.S. 294, 323 (1962)) (other citations omitted). … FTC v. Whole Foods Market, Inc., 548 F.3d 1028, 1037 (D.C. Cir. 2008) (Brown, J.).

A.H. Hansen Sales, Ltd. v. National Labor Relations Board

961 F.2d 963 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 22, 1992

HANSEN SALES, LTD., Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. No. 91-1257. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. April 22, 1992. Before WALD, HARRY T. … See Napili Shores Condominium Homeowners' Ass'n v. NLRB, 939 F.2d 717, 719 (9th Cir.1991); NLRB v. Lake Holiday Assocs., Inc., 930 F.2d 1231, 1234 (7th Cir.1991).

Weeks v. United States ex rel. Creary

277 F. 594 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 3, 1922

Wilcox v. Jackson, 13 Pet. 498 , 513: United States v. Eliason, 16 Pot. 291, 302; Confiscation Cases, 20 Wall. 92, 109 ; United States v. Farden, 99 U. S. 10, 19 ; Wolsey v. Chapman, 101 U. … In Marbury v. Madison, 1 Cranch, 137 , 2 L.

In Re Manville

494 A.2d 1289 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 28, 1985

Schware v. Board of Bar Examiners, 353 U.S. 232, 239 , 77 S.Ct. 752, 756 , 1 L.Ed.2d 796 (1957). … See In re Application of Matthews, 462 A.2d at 174; Florida Board of Bar Examiners; In re Eimers, 358 So.2d 7, 9 (Fla.1978) (per curiam); Rosenthal v.