Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersOK

5,409 results

0.88s

  • Application of Sanger

    64 O.B.A.J. 3641 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 7, 1993

    a rejected bar applicant is entitled to notice of the reasons upon which his lack of the requisite ethical fitness was rested and to a meaningful post-rejection opportunity in a timely requested hearing to prove himself qualified … The pertinent terms of Rule 11 § 7, Rules Governing Admission to the Practice of Law in the State of Oklahoma, 5 O.S.1991 Ch. 1, App. 5., are: "The burden of establishing eligibility for admission to the Bar of this state

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 77-235 (1977) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 20, 1977

    This Section provides for the required establishment of provisions relating to teacher evaluations. … However, a "teaching principal", clearly falling within the definition of an administrator, is not required by law to possess an administrator's certificate in order to be qualified to act as a teaching principal.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Dodson v. Reed

    District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Sep 13, 2021

    Qualified Immunity Eastwood also argues that she is entitled to qualified immunity from liability on Dodson’s unlawful strip search claim. … Law enforcement officers “are entitled to qualified immunity under §1983 unless (1) they violated a federal statutory or constitutional right, and (2) the unlawfulness of their conduct was clearly established at the time

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Burks v. State

    568 P.2d 1311 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 7, 1977

    That is, tends to establish (1) motive, (2) intent, (3) the absence of mistake or accident, (4) a common scheme or plan embracing the commission of two or more crimes so related to each other that proof of one tends to establish … We think the evidence in the instant case clearly falls within at least three, if not four of the above exceptions.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Luton v. State

    47 Okla. Crim. 82 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 18, 1930

    It is clearly shown that no legal ground is set out in the motion for continuance. No diligence on the part of the defendant is shown. The motion for continuance was properly overruled. … All of the courts hold that the corpus delicti cannot be established upon the uncorroborated confession of the defendant.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Buttler v. City of Sperry

    District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Feb 8, 2023

    established at that time for purposes of qualified immunity. … Qualified immunity shields an official as long as the official’s conduct does not violate clearly established law that “a reasonable person would have known.” See Mullenix, 577 U.S. at 11 (citation omitted).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Arrow Tool & Gauge v. Mead

    71 O.B.A.J. 2896 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 31, 2000

    It hence qualifies as a last order within the meaning of § 48(C). … would also qualify. 34 . 85 O.S.

    Cited 69 timesPublished
  • Dryden v. Burkhart

    198 Okla. 239 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 17, 1946

    Fowler, who qualified and acted as such until July 21, 1941, when upon motion of Mrs. 'R. E. Eden, nee Luna A. … The purpose of the probate of a will is to establish of record its status as a written instrument (In re Bloom’s Estate, 213 Cal. 575 , 2 P. 2d 753 ). As declared in Bouvier L.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Ex Parte Owen

    10 Okla. Crim. 284 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Nov 15, 1913

    Ed. 717 , said: “The Constitution having established the right on one part and the obligation on the other, it became necessary to provide by law the mode of carrying it into execution. … The Supreme Court of Florida, in Ex parte Powell, 20 Fla. 807 , at page 810, in the body of the opinion, after quoting from the Dennison case, supra, said: “It is very clearly stated by Chief Justice Taney, in the opinion

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Cleveland v. School Dist. No. 79, Grady County

    51 Okla. 69 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Aug 10, 1915

    The filing of a petition signed by at least one-third of the cmalified electors of such district, and the giving of 20 days’ notice are clearly jurisdictional facts. … The law creates the corporation, and the performance of the required conditions qualifies the corporation to act.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Dodson v. Reed

    District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · Sep 2, 2021

    Qualified Immunity Eastwood also argues that she is entitled to qualified immunity from liability on Dodson’s unlawful strip search claim. … Law enforcement officers “are entitled to qualified immunity under §1983 unless (1) they violated a federal statutory or constitutional right, and (2) the unlawfulness of their conduct was clearly established at the time

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Opinion No. 70-137 (1970) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 1, 1970

    FIREMEN — RETIREMENT House Bill 1616, Thirty-Second Legislature, Second Session, applies to a fireman, otherwise qualified, who retires on February 21, 1970. … The language "during the last thirty (30) months of his service" clearly establishes that the end of the term of his service, or date of retirement, is the date from which the thirty (30) months is computed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Marr v. State

    741 P.2d 884 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Aug 12, 1987

    In demonstrating the possession of specialized knowledge by the witness, it is necessary to qualify him as an expert in the field for which his opinion testimony is sought. In Croy v. … The State also established the bases for the trooper’s opinions.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Pendleton v. Oklahoma County Board of County Commissioners

    District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Sep 30, 2019

    “Qualified immunity protects officials from liability for civil damages insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which a reasonable person would have known.” … And while Defendants’ invocation of qualified immunity arguably raised the clearly-established-law question, see Cox v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Question Submitted by: Senator Mary B. Boren, Oklahoma State Senate, District 16

    2024 OK AG 5 · Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 28, 2024

    Executive Director of the ODOT ¶8 The position of Executive Director of ODOT clearly meets each element of the foregoing Century Indemnity test. First, the position, is expressly established by ODOT's enabling statutes. … OAC 731:10-1-5(7). ¶18 The position of Executive Director of OTA is thus clearly established by law and provides definite duties. Therefore, the first two elements of the Century Indemnity test are met.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Muscogee (Creek) Nation Division of Housing v. United States Department of Housing & Urban Development

    819 F. Supp. 2d 1225 · District Court, E.D. Oklahoma · May 2, 2011

    PLAINTIFF HAS FAILED TO ESTABLISH A WAIVER OF SOVEREIGN IMMUNITY Defendants assert the Court lacks jurisdiction over Plaintiffs challenge to 24 C.F.R. § 1000.58 (g) and Notice PIH 2009-6, section 7(c), because Congress has … The Court further finds that Plaintiff cannot rely on Ex Parte Young, 209 U.S. 123 , 28 S.Ct. 441 , 52 L.Ed. 714 (1908), to establish sovereign immunity has been waived for Plaintiffs claims.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • West

    District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Mar 20, 2026

    Defendants also assert that they are entitled to qualified immunity and dismissal of Plaintiffs’ claims on such basis. … Here, Defendants assertion of qualified immunity in their respective Motions is patently deficient.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Catholic Benefits Ass'n LCA v. Sebelius

    24 F. Supp. 3d 1094 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jun 4, 2014

    Francis, these Plaintiffs qualify for the accommodation. … And here, the parties clearly disagree as to the scope of the preliminary injunction, rendering Reaching Souls unconvincing on this point. .

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Dixon v. Regional University System of the Oklahoma Board of Regents

    District Court, E.D. Oklahoma · Dec 3, 2020

    right and that the right violated was clearly established at the time of the defendant's actions.” … It is clearly established that the denial of qualifying leave and the termination of employment in relation to an FMLA leave request is a violation of the law. See Twigg v.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • ADECCO INC. v. Dollar

    254 P.3d 729 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Mar 7, 2011

    decision. 3 STANDARD OF REVIEW T9 Rulings concerning expert witness qualifications and the admissibility of expert testimony "rest in the discretion of the trial court, and a decision on them will not be disturbed unless it clearly … workers' compensation cases, in matters where-although the "probative value" of his opinion may have been challenged-his qualification as an "expert" to give that opinion was not raised. 20 The opinion that McClure submitted clearly

    Cited 2 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.