Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersOR

10,000+ results

1.55s

  • Brown v. Westfal-Larsen & Co.

    235 Or. 64 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 15, 1963

    Gutierrez v. Waterman Steamship Corp., 83 S Ct 1185 , 10 L Ed2d 297 (1963). … Michalic v. Cleveland Tankers, Inc., 364 US 325 , 81 S Ct 6 , 5 L Ed2d 20 (1960); Mahnich v. Southern S. S. Co., 321 US 96, 103 , 64 S Ct 455 , 88 L Ed 561 (1944).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • McGee v. Civil Service Board

    211 Or. App. 149 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 28, 2007

    The board appeals, arguing that the trial court erred for essentially two reasons. First, the board argues, under State ex rel Heinig v. … Kellas v. Dept. of Corrections, 341 Or 471, 478 , 145 P3d 139 (2006).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Coleman v. Board of Parole

    215 Or. App. 112 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 19, 2007

    App. 112 COLEMAN v. BOARD OF PAROLE and Post-Prison Supervision. Court of Appeals of Oregon. September 19, 2007. Affirmed without opinion.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Department of Revenue

    308 Or. 111 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 13, 1989

    Brown v. Dept. of Rev., 11 OTR 61 (1988). On de novo review, ORS 305.445, ORS 19.125(2), we affirm. We summarize the facts detailed in the Tax Court’s opinion. … Brown v. Dept. of Rev., 11 OTR 61 at 64 . Although our scope of review is de novo, we accord some deference to the Tax Court’s findings concerning a witness’s credibility.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. City of Silverton

    50 Or. 425 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 16, 1908

    The material facts being identical with the case of Cusiter v. City of Silverton, 50 Or. 419 ( 93 Pac. 234 ), that case is controlling.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brumnett v. Psychiatric Security Review Board

    315 Or. 402 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 19, 1993

    He was committed to the jurisdiction of the Psychiatric Security Review Board (PSRB) for 25 years. … Brumnett v. Psychiatric Security Review Board, 106 Or App 182 , 807 P2d 347 (1991). This court allowed review.

    Cited 193 timesPublished
  • Gehring v. Board of Parole

    342 Or. 416 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 21, 2007

    154 P.3d 722 (2007) 342 Or. 416 GEHRING v. BOARD OF PAROLE and Post-Prison Supervision. S54399. Supreme Court of Oregon. February 21, 2007. Petition for review denied.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Singleton v. Board of Parole

    342 Or. 416 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 21, 2007

    154 P.3d 722 (2007) 342 Or. 416 SINGLETON v. BOARD OF PAROLE and Post-Prison Supervision. S54436. Supreme Court of Oregon. February 21, 2007. Petition for review denied.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Alexanderson v. Board of Commissioners

    290 Or. 137 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 4, 1980

    See Alexanderson v. Polk County Commissioners, 289 Or 427 , 616 P2d 459 (1980).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Drew v. Psychiatric Security Review Board

    322 Or. 491 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 1, 1996

    Drew v. Psychiatric Security Review Board, 127 Or App 753 , 875 P2d 546 (1994). … Rolfe v. Psychiatric Security Review Board, 53 Or App 941, 951 , 633 P2d 846 , rev den 292 Or 334 (1981). We agree with that statement and adopt it as our own.

    Cited 92 timesPublished
  • Nakashima v. BOARD OF EDUC.

    342 Or. 116 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 5, 2006

    149 P.3d 138 (2006) 342 Or. 116 NAKASHIMA v. BOARD OF EDUC. No. S53972. Oregon Supreme Court. December 5, 2006 Petition for review allowed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Lenon v. Public Employees Retirement Board

    228 Or. App. 20 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 29, 2009

    Oregon Restaurant Services v. … S-W Floor Cover Shop v. Natl.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Baker v. Board of Parole

    303 Or. 656 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 4, 1987

    The Board voted to sustain the minimum sentence and set a one-year period of supervision on parole because of the nature of the offense. The Board is not required to state further details for its decision. Anderson V. … Board of Parole, 303 Or 618 , 740 P2d 760 (1987). This petitioner’s other complaint is that the Board failed to consider a factor in mitigation.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Brogoitti Et Ux v. Brown Et Ux

    231 Or. 309 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 27, 1962

    Sterling v. … Randell v. Randell, 4 Cal.2d 575 , 50 P2d 806 .” In Morris v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Castillo v. Board of Parole

    338 Or. 680 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 6, 2005

    115 P.3d 245 (2005) 338 Or. 680 CASTILLO v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION. No. S51823. Supreme Court of Oregon. July 6, 2005. Petition for review allowed.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Salibello v. Oregon Board of Optometry

    276 Or. App. 363 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 3, 2016

    Hawes v. … Morgan v.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Fisher v. Board of Parole

    338 Or. 374 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 5, 2005

    110 P.3d 113 (2005) 338 Or. 374 FISHER v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION No. S52046. Supreme Court of Oregon. April 5, 2005 Petition for review denied.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State Land Board v. United States

    222 Or. 40 · Oregon Supreme Court · May 18, 1960

    S. v. Gallagher, 97 F Sup 1014, 1015 (SD Cal 1951); U. S. v. Brown, 110 F Sup 370, 372 (SD Cal 1952); U. S. v. Peoples Nat. Bank of Chicago, 121 F Sup 331, 332 (ND Ill 1953); U. S. v. The Mid City Nat. … Dexter v. Hall, supra (21 L.ed at 77). In coming to his conclusion in U. S. v.

    Reversed on other grounds by United States v. Oregon, 366 U.S. 643 (1961)Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Robinson v. Public Employees Retirement Board

    351 Or. 404 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 30, 2011

    Arken v. 4 City of Portland, 351 Or 113, ___ P3d ___ (2011). … We allow petitioners' request for reconsideration, but adhere 12 to our previous opinion. 13 In Strunk v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Osborn v. Psychiatric Security Review Board

    325 Or. 135 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 27, 1997

    Relying on Hillman v. North. Wasco Co. PUD, 213 Or 264 , 323 P2d 664 (1958), overruled on other grounds by Maulding v. … Axis I consists of clinical syndromes and V Codes. For a definition of “V Codes,” see note 13, below. Axis II consists of developmental disorders and personality disorders.

    Cited 29 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.