Case law

Brown v. Brown

185 A.D.2d 812 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Aug 3, 1992

McClure, 176 AD2d 325, 326 ; Matter of Andrews v Andrews, 168 AD2d 444 ; Matter of Gansburg v Gansburg, 127 AD2d 766 ; see also, Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne, 50 NY2d 707 ). … Leffingwell, 86 AD2d 929 ; see also, Merola v Merola, 146 AD2d 611 ; Kilmer v Kilmer, 109 AD2d 1004 ; Besharov, Practice Commentary, McKinney’s Cons Laws of NY, Book 29A, Family Ct Act § 842, at 194).

Brown v. Brown

362 S.C. 85 · Court of Appeals of South Carolina · Dec 6, 2004

Brown (Mother) appeals the family court order awarding custody of the couples’ three children to George C. Brown (Father). We affirm. … .”); Bragg v.

Buncombe County Board of Health v. Brown

271 N.C. 401 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 20, 1967

Reade, J., in Doyle v. … To the same effect is Condry v. Cheshire, 88 N.C. 375 . Smith, C.J., in Lyon [Lynn] v.

Brown v. Brown

18 Conn. 410 · Supreme Court of Connecticut · Jul 15, 1847

Snellgrove v. Bailey, 3 Atk. 214. Ward v. Turner, 2 Ves. 431. 441. This reasoning seems at best to be artificial. … Parish & al. v. Stone, 14 Pick. 198 . *417 Grover, admr. v. Grover, 24 Pick. 261 .

Board of Education of Ashland School District v. Chattin

376 S.W.2d 693 · Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · Mar 13, 1964

Hoskins v. Keen, Ky., 350 S.W.2d 467, 469 (1961). … In Guthrie v.

Brown v. Brown

45 Mo. 412 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 15, 1870

Brown, under a purchase from the latter’s administrator in October, 1855, for the consideration of $2,025. … Ev., § 307; Adams on Eject., by Tillinghast, p. 248; Merchants’ Bank v. Harrison, 39 Mo. 433 .)

Brown v. California Department of Corrections

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 22, 2009

BACKGROUND Brown’s claims stem from our grant of Brown’s habeas petition in Brown v. Poole, 337 F.3d 1155 (9th Cir. 2003). … Absolute Immunity For Parole Board Decisions By Parole Board Members [4] The district court properly granted summary judgment on Brown’s claims against the parole board members, as parole board members are entitled

Brown v. . Brown

124 N.C. 19 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 21, 1899

State v. Massey, 97 N. C., 465 . … In Reed v. Reed (Appellate Court of Indiana), 33 N. E.

Brown v. Brown

4 Ind. 627 · Indiana Supreme Court · Dec 31, 1853

See Loveland v. Jones, ante, p. 184. Per Curiam. The judgment is affirmed with costs.

Brown v. Brown

61 Tex. 45 · Texas Supreme Court · Feb 5, 1884

Munson v. Hallowell, 26 Tex., 486 ; Ripley v. Withee, 27 Tex., 14 ; Anding v. Perkins, 29 Tex., 354 ; Bremond v. McLean, 45 Tex., 11 ; Alston v. Richardson, 51 Tex., 1 . … Henderson v. Pilgrim, 22 Tex., 471 ; Wade on the Law of Notice, sec. 34.

Brown v. . Brown

58 N.Y. 609 · New York Court of Appeals · Nov 10, 1874

Brown v. Brown

132 Conn. App. 30 · Connecticut Appellate Court · Nov 8, 2011

Brown, and (2) making certain findings with respect to the parties’ eldest child. … Brown that is the problem.”

Brown v. Brown

392 S.C. 615 · Court of Appeals of South Carolina · Mar 30, 2011

Sheri Denise Brown (Wife) and Phillip Ray Brown (Husband) were divorced in 2006. … See Eaddy v.

Brown v. Brown

300 Ga. 559 · Supreme Court of Georgia · Jan 23, 2017

Killingsworth v. Killingsworth, 286 Ga. 234 (3) ( 686 SE2d 640 ) (2009). … See also Pollard v. Pollard, 297 Ga. 21, 22 ( 771 SE2d 875 ) (2015) (“It is well settled that a court may not modify a divorce decree in a contempt order. . . .”).

Brown v. Brown

266 N.Y. 532 · New York Court of Appeals · Jan 24, 1935

Brown v. Brown

86 Tenn. 277 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jan 27, 1888

Brown v. H. A. … In Wilkinson v.

Brown v. Brown

12 A.D.3d 176 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 4, 2004

“Beneficiaries enjoy only expectancy interests and not vested legal rights” (Blackmon v Estate of Battcock, 78 NY2d 735, 739 [1991]). … Capital v Karp Family Assoc., 285 AD2d 361, 362 [2001]). In any event, the tort claims were merely duplicative of the insufficiently pleaded breach of contract causes of action herein.

Brown v. Vitelcom, Inc.

47 F. Supp. 2d 595 · District Court, Virgin Islands · Apr 26, 1999

s directors, Neil Prior and Jeffrey Prosser, also sat on Vitelcom's corporate board. … ATN Inc. and Vitelcom's corporate boards had two directors in common, Neil Prior and Jeffrey Prosser, who apparently owned 60% of both companies.

Brown v. Brown

156 Tenn. 619 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Mar 31, 1928

In Clark v. … Lyon v. Lyon, supra.

Brown v. Brown

28 Minn. 501 · Supreme Court of Minnesota · Dec 23, 1881

In Norton v. … Shaubhut v. Hilton, 7 Minn. 412 , (506;) Keegan v. Peterson, 24 Minn. 1 . Judgment affirmed.