Case law

Brown v. Brown

97 A.D.3d 673 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 11, 2012

The Family Court’s determination will not be set aside unless it lacks a substantial basis in the record (see Matter of Wispe v Leandry, 63 AD3d 853 [2009]; Matter of Franklin v Richey, 57 AD3d at 664 ). … (see Matter of Solovay v Solovay, 94 AD3d 898, *675 900 [2012], lv denied 19 NY3d 808 [2012]; Matter of Nell v Nell, 87 AD3d 541, 542-543 [2011]).

Brown v. Brown

147 A.D.3d 896 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Feb 15, 2017

Hartog, 85 NY2d at 48 ; Price v Price, 69 NY2d at 18-19 ; Dinoto v Dinoto, 97 AD3d 529, 530 [2012]; Alper v Alper, 77 AD3d 694, 695 [2010]; Embury v Embury, 49 AD3d 802, 804 [2008]; Scharfman v Scharfman, 19 AD3d 474 [2005 … Therefore, the plaintiff was entitled to a share of that appreciation (see Hartog v Hartog, 85 NY2d 36 [1995]; Price v Price, 69 NY2d at 18-19 ; Hymowitz v Hymowitz, 119 AD3d 736, 739 [2014]; Imhof v Imhof, 259 AD2d at 667

Brown v. Brown

54 A.D.2d 553 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Sep 20, 1976

award of temporary alimony is a speedy trial where the true facts as to finances and standards of living of the parties can be ascertained, and where the defendant’s right to alimony can be finally determined (see Tobias v

Brown v. Brown

16 Barb. 569 · New York Supreme Court · Oct 19, 1852

.- (Platt v. Arthur, 10 Barb. 9 . Beck v. McGillis, 9 Id. 35 . Rose v. Rose, 7 Id. 174.) The case of Walton v. Walton, (7 John Ch. … (Ellison v. Miller. 11 Barb. 332 . Arthur v. Arthur, 10 Id. 9. Pond v. Bergh, 10 Paige 140,149 .)

Brown v. Brown

52 A.D.3d 903 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 5, 2008

Tropea, 87 NY2d 727, 742 [1996]; Matter of Gutiy v Gutiy, 40 AD3d 1155, 1156 [2007]; Matter of Winn v Cutting, 39 AD3d 1000, 1001 [2007]; Matter of Armstrong v Crout, 33 AD3d 1079, 1079-1080 [2006]). … We note that Family Court did not speak to the children about the proposed move (see Matter of Cornell v Cornell, 8 AD3d 718, 719 [2004]; Grandin v Grandin, 8 AD3d 710, 712 [2004]; see also Matter of Gravelding v Loper, 42

Brown v. Brown

122 A.D.2d 762 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Aug 4, 1986

v Brown, 122 Misc 2d 849, 850 ). … However, even when the correct preponderance of the evidence standard is applied (see, Smith v Smith, 88 AD2d 658 ; Spillman v Spillman, 67 *764 AD2d 942 , affd 49 NY2d 745 ), the record supports the court’s determination

Brown v. Brown

71 Misc. 2d 818 · New York Supreme Court · Feb 9, 1972

It also provides that the child’s parents ‘ ‘ shall have visitation rights to be set by the Probation Department,” recognizing that “in fixing the rights of visitation for Michelle Brown (the mother) to keep in mind that … Only if1 she is not a fit person to do- so, may a nonparent be considered to undertake the task (Matter of Spence-Chapin Adoption Serv. v. Polk, 29 N Y 2d 196, 203).

Brown v. Brown

130 A.D.3d 923 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jul 22, 2015

Kass, 115 AD3d 748 [2014]; Matter of Gordon v Goldin, 95 AD3d 1115 [2012]). … Shangraw, 61 AD3d 1302, 1304 [2009]; Kelly v Kelly, 19 AD3d 1104 , 1106 [2005]; Matter of Stewart v Stewart, 222 AD2d 895, 896-897 [1995]; cf.

Brown v. Brown

39 A.D.2d 897 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 29, 1972

Brown v. Brown

31 N.Y.2d 956 · New York Court of Appeals · Dec 29, 1972

Brown v. Brown

239 N.Y. 518 · New York Court of Appeals · Oct 14, 1924

Brown v. Brown

23 Barb. 565 · New York Supreme Court · Mar 2, 1857

The cases of Stanwood v. Stanwood, ( 17 Mass. Rep. 57 ,) Phelps v. Phelps, ( 20 Pick. 556 ,) Ames v. New, ( 5 Metc. 320 ,) and Fish v.

Brown v. Brown

87 A.D.2d 680 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Mar 4, 1982

(Lewis v Counts, 81 AD2d 857 ). … from the prosecutor’s conduct (see Chmielewski v Smith, 73 AD2d 1053 ).

Brown v. Brown

91 Misc. 220 · City of New York Municipal Court · Jun 15, 1915

Boston Steel & Iron Co. v. Steuer, 183 Mass. 140, 144 ; Thorke v. White, 188 id. 333, 334; Merseck v. Alderman, 77 Conn. 634 , 60 Atl. Rep. 109 ; South Boston Iron Co. v. Brown, 63 Maine, 139; Campbell v. … , but sued Brown upon the note.

Brown v. Brown

153 A.D. 645 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 6, 1912

The learned court based its decision upon Berry v. Berry ( 130 App. Div. 53 ). … While the equitable principle, made the basis of our decision in Berry v.

Brown v. Brown

122 Misc. 2d 849 · New York Supreme Court · Jan 20, 1984

(Zipparo v Zipparo, 70 AD2d 616 .)

Brown v. Brown

34 A.D.2d 907 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 9, 1970

Although it is within the power of the trial court to provide that permanent alimony and child support payments shall be paid from the commencement of an action for divorce or separation (Forrest v. Forrest, 25 1ST. … Y. 501; Burr v. Burr, 10 Paige ch. 20; Lowe v.

Brown v. Brown

31 A.D.2d 516 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 7, 1968

(Brownstein v. Brownstein, 25 A D 2d 205, 208; Hearst v. Hearst, 3 A D 2d 706, affd. 3 N Y 2d 967.)

Brown v. . Brown

47 N.Y. 657 · New York Court of Appeals · Jan 23, 1872

Brown v. Brown

101 N.Y.S. 1114 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Nov 16, 1906