Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
2.30s
192 N.C. App. 734 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 16, 2008
JANET SUE BROWN, Plaintiff, v. LARRY WINFRED BROWN, Defendant. No. COA07-1475 Court of Appeals of North Carolina. Filed September 16, 2008 This case not for publication Cecilia C. Johnson for defendant-appellant. … Larry Winfred Brown (defendant) appeals from an order awarding alimony in favor of Janet Sue Brown (plaintiff).
Cited 0 timesPublished85 N.C. App. 602 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 5, 1987
G.S. 50-16.9(a); Britt v. Britt, 49 N.C. App. 463 , 271 S.E. 2d 921 (1980). … Rowe v. Rowe, 305 N.C. 177, 187 , 287 S.E. 2d 840, 846 (1982). See also Stallings v. Stallings, 36 N.C. App. 643 , 244 S.E. 2d 494 , disc. rev. denied, 295 N.C. 648 , 248 S.E. 2d 249 (1978).
Cited 1 timesPublished27 N.C. 136 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 5, 1844
In Ford v. Whidbee, 1 Dev. & Bat. … In the next session after the decision of Ford v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · May 21, 2024
COA23-1014 Filed 21 May 2024 Wake County, No. 19CVS500511 CHEREE BROWN, Plaintiff, v. CARUSO HOMES, INC., Defendant. … See Kornegay v. Aspen -4- BROWN V. CARUSO HOMES, INC. Opinion of the Court Asset Grp., LLC, 204 N.C.
Cited 0 timesPublished188 N.C. App. 164 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 15, 2008
TERRI LYNN BROWN v. DAVID RAY BROWN No. COA06-682 Court of Appeals of North Carolina. Filed January 15, 2008 This case not for publication A. Marshall Basinger, II, for plaintiff-appellant. … Factual Background Terri Lynn Brown ("plaintiff") was married to David Ray Brown ("defendant") on 10 June 1989.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 5, 2023
Neither BROWN V. … ” -3- BROWN V.
Cited 0 timesPublishedCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · May 7, 2025
STATE V. BROWN Opinion of the Court I. … - 10 - STATE V. BROWN Opinion of the Court See State v.
Cited 0 timesPublished791 S.E.2d 662 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 6, 2016
Cited 4 timesPublishedNo opinion textNorth Carolina Industrial Commission · Jan 17, 2007
There were two children born of the marriage between deceased-employee and Kathy Fraley Brown. Rebekah Grace Brown was born on July 21, 1991. Hannah Leigh Brown was born on October 15, 1993. 6. … Other than Rebekah Grace Brown and Hannah Leigh Brown, deceased-employee and Kathy Fraley Brown did not have any other biological children, did not take steps to legally adopt any children, and did not acknowledge any children
Cited 0 timesPublished2 N.C. 227 · Superior Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1795
That the indisposition or death of the witness is to be proven by others is strongly implied in the words used in Fry v.
Cited 2 timesPublished364 N.C. 184 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 17, 2010
Shelton v. Morehead Mem’l Hosp., 318 N.C. 76, 81-82 , 347 S.E.2d 824, 828 (1986) (citations omitted). Questions of statutory interpretation are questions of law and are reviewed de novo. E.g., Brown v.
Cited 29 timesPublished187 N.C. App. 465 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 4, 2007
State v. Brown, 310 N.C. 563, 566 , 313 S.E.2d 585, 587 (1984). In reviewing the evidence, the court must draw all reasonable inferences in the State’s favor. State v. … See State v.
Cited 5 timesPublished827 S.E.2d 146 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 7, 2019
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text821 S.E.2d 314 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 20, 2018
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text818 S.E.2d 647 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 2, 2018
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text817 S.E.2d 497 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 7, 2018
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text112 N.C. App. 619 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 16, 1993
ruling under this rule, the complaint must be viewed as admitted and on that basis the court must determine as a matter of law whether the allegations state a claim for which relief may be granted. *622 State of Tennessee v. … Brown’s complaint. Moreover, Mrs. Brown’s actions, often little more than defensive gestures, cannot be construed as a “failure in the due performance” of her obligations under the separation agreement.
Cited 0 timesPublished59 N.C. App. 719 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 7, 1982
See Harris v. Ashley, 38 N.C. App. 494, 248 S.E. 2d 393 (1978) and Scott v. Moser, 31 N.C. App. 268 , 229 S.E. 2d 222 (1976), cert. denied, 291 N.C. 712 , 232 S.E. 2d 204 (1977). … Woolard v. Smith, 244 N.C. 489 , 94 S.E. 2d 466 (1956), which is relied on by the petitioner, does not involve a division deed. It is not precedent for this case.
Cited 0 timesPublished809 S.E.2d 406 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 6, 2018
Cited 0 timesPublishedNo opinion text191 N.C. App. 734 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 5, 2008
“No less than a tenant of a house, or the occupant of a room in a boarding house, a guest in a hotel room is entitled to constitutional protection against unreasonable searches and seizures.” Stoner v. … The State cites State v.
Cited 4 timesPublished
Ask Donna