Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersMO

10,000+ results

9.84s

  • Allen v. Coffel

    488 S.W.2d 671 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 4, 1972

    Huntington v. Town Board of Oyster Bay, 57 Misc.2d 821, 823 , 293 N.Y.S.2d 558, 560 ; Kamerman v. Le Roy, 133 Conn. 232, 237 , 50 A.2d 175, 178 ; Village of Russell Gardens v. … Board of Zoning and Appeals, 30 Misc.2d 392 , 219 N.Y.S.2d 501 ; Clark v. City of Colo. Springs, 162 Colo. 593, 596 , 428 P.2d 359, 361 .

    Cited 33 timesPublished
  • Anna Emealia Brown v. Richard Lotman Brown

    Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 19, 2024

    Brown v. Brown, 620 S.W.3d 257 (Mo. App. 2021). … Jones v. Jones, 536 S.W.3d 383, 386-387 (Mo.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Anna Emealia Brown v. Richard Lotman Brown

    Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 21, 2023

    See Brown v. Brown, 645 S.W.3d 75, 78 (Mo. App. W.D. 2022) (recognizing that Ex-Husband has appeared before this Court four times in a dispute concerning the trusts created by his parents); Brown v. … Brown v. Brown, 645 S.W.3d 75, 84 (Mo. App. W.D. 2022) (quoting Capital One Bank v. Hardin, 178 S.W.3d 565, 577 (Mo. App. W.D. 2005)).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    66 S.W.3d 721 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 13, 2002

    In Brown v. … Brown’s habeas claim also. 7 . This case is thus distinguishable from Brown v.

    Overruled on other grounds by State Ex Rel. Zinna v. Steele, 2010 Mo. LEXIS 3 (2010)Cited 67 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    337 S.W.3d 12 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 17, 2011

    State v. Shurn, 866 S.W.2d 447, 460 (Mo. banc 1993). A prosecutor is allowed to argue the evidence and all reasonable inferences from the evidence during closing arguments. State v. … The limitations on the admissibility of demonstrative evidence are illustrated in, among other cases, State v. Wynne, 353 Mo. 276 , 182 S.W.2d 294 (1944); State v. Grant, 810 S.W.2d 591, 592 (Mo.App.1991); and State v.

    Cited 27 timesPublished
  • Brown v. State

    174 S.W.3d 711 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 1, 2005

    Brown appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 post-conviction relief motion. For reasons stated in the memorandum provided to the parties, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    157 S.W.3d 373 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 8, 2005

    Lamar Brown (Defendant) appeals from the trial court’s judgment and sentence imposed after a jury found him guilty of one count of first-degree murder, in violation of Section 565.020 1 , and one count of armed criminal action

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    174 S.W.3d 728 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 1, 2005

    Danny Brown appeals the judgment of his convictions, following a jury trial in the Circuit Court of Jackson County, for first-degree burglary, in violation of § 569.160.1(3); stealing, in violation of § 570.030; forcible

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    902 S.W.2d 278 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 25, 1995

    The record clearly indicates that Brown received his warnings under Miranda v. … In State v.

    Cited 257 timesPublished
  • State of Missouri v. George Richey, and State of Missouri v. John B. Wright

    569 S.W.3d 420 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 19, 2019

    State v. Johnson, 524 S.W.3d 505, 510 (Mo. banc 2017). When interpreting a statute, “each word, clause, sentence, and section of a statute should be given meaning.” Middleton v. Mo. … Cramer v. Smith, 168 S.W.2d 1039, 1040 (Mo. banc 1943).

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Vansickle v. Brown

    68 Mo. 627 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1878

    In Merkle v. … In the case of Brant v.

    Cited 38 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    64 Mo. 367 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 15, 1877

    Brown, where the ceremony was to take place, there were several persons besides said Jasper Brown, uncle of defendant, defendant’s mother, Miss Maddershott, and defendant; that deceased came to the house, and without any … The facts proven by those affidavits are, that the jury during the trial of the cause *372 boarded at.the house of J. J.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    188 Mo. 451 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 16, 1905

    [State v. Elkins, 101 Mo. 344 ; State v. Bryant, 93 Mo. 273 ; State v. Cunningham, 100 Mo. 382 .] … Grant, 79 Mo. l. c. 137; State v. Guy, 69 Mo. 430 ; State v. Hamilton, 170 Mo. 377 .

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    382 S.W.3d 147 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 4, 2012

    At the suppression hearing, the State relied on State v. Toolen, 945 S.W.2d 629 (Mo.App. E.D.1997), to argue Brown’s lack of standing. … See State v. Oliver, 293 S.W.3d 437, 443 (Mo. banc 2009); State v. Mahsman, 157 S.W.3d 245, 251 (Mo.App.2004); State v.

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Moore v. Brown

    350 Mo. 256 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 12, 1942

    Laird v. Hall, 49 N. D. 11, 17 , 186 N. W. 284, 286-7 ; Larkin v. Gronna, 69 N. D. 234, 241 , 285 N. W. 59, 63 (6-8). … Carson v. Kozer, 126 Ore. 651, 646 , 270 Pac. 513, 515 ; State ex rel. v. Olcott, 62 Ore. 277, 279 , 125 Pac. 303, 304 ; State ex rel. Bullard v. Osborn, 16 Ariz. 247, 250 , 143 Pac. 117, 118 ; Anderson v. Byrne, 62 N.

    Cited 56 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Wood

    19 Mo. 475 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 15, 1854

    Brown sued Wood for labor and materials, before a justice of the peace in attachment. The suit was .commenced on the 2d December, 1852, and the account was dated 11th September, 1852.

    Cited 27 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    104 Mo. 365 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 15, 1891

    State v. Banks, 73 Mo. 692 ; State v. Palmer, 88 Mo. 568 ; State v. Partlow, 90 Mo. 608 ; State v. Young, 99 Mo. 666 . III. … V.

    Cited 25 timesPublished
  • Rogers v. Brown

    61 Mo. 187 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 15, 1875

    Malins, V. C., in Chetham vs. Hoare, 9 Law Rep. Eq. … Brown claims adversely to the right purchased by the plaintiff under execution, and as the purpose of the present suit is to make Brown a trustee against his will, he should be treated as holding adversely to the creditors

    Cited 43 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    209 Mo. 413 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Feb 18, 1908

    [State v. Adams, 108 Mo. 208 ; Margrave v. Ausmuss, 51 Mo. 567 .] … The elements of the offense, necessary to be alleged and proven were the sexual intercourse between the defendant and Laura Brown, and that she was his daughter.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Burrus

    8 Mo. 26 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 15, 1843

    Brown, the appellant, Nathaniel Ford, and Robert Brown, for seizing and taking away a negro girl slave, named Nancy. … Some evidence was given against the defendants, Ford and Brown, in the court below.

    Cited 17 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.