Case law

Weiss v. Brown

691 A.2d 1208 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 1, 1997

Knight v. … Bliss v. Bliss, 583 A.2d 208, 210 (Me.1990).

Greenstreet v. Brown

623 A.2d 1270 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 21, 1993

The Browns next argue that the evidence was insufficient to support the finding that Ralph Brown’s malpractice was the proximate cause of Greenstreet’s damages. Proximate cause is a question of fact. LaFerriere v. … Because the Browns failed to offer any evidence at the trial that the mitigation of Greenstreet’s damages was feasible, see Lindsey v.

Chesley v. Brown

11 Me. 143 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 15, 1834

In the case of Commonwealth v. Stevens, 15 *148 Mass. 195 , the plea was, not guilty.- The counsel for the defendants cited the case of Stilson v. … J. in Stilson v. Tobey , the proceedings in Commonwealth v. Stevens , should have been quashed; for both cases were tried on the plea of not guilty.

Brown v. Corriveau

576 A.2d 200 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 21, 1990

Plaintiff Gale Brown appeals from an order of the Superior Court (Kennebec County, Wathen, J.) vacating an order of the District Court (Augusta, Studstrup, J.) partially lifting an attachment on trustee process of defendant … See In re Christopher C., 499 A.2d 163, 164 (Me.1985); Dunning v. Dunning, 495 A.2d 821 , 823 n. 1 (Me.1985).

Brown v. Snell

46 Me. 490 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1859

Bullard v. Hinckley, 8 Greenl., 289; Russell v. Dudley, 3 Met., 147 . It remains to be seen whether, if the mortgage be regarded as outstanding, this bill can be maintained. By R. … J., in Shaw v. Gray, 23 Maine, 174, “ the power delegated must have reference to the modes of proceeding particularly prescribed for the purpose.” French v. Sturtevant, 8 Greenl. 246; Chase v.

Brown v. Bishop

105 Me. 272 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 9, 1909

Brown (ls) in presence of R. W. Brown, J. C. Bishop (ls)” *275 The specified consideration of $350 was paid within the time provided therefor. … Pease v. Gibson, 6 Maine, 81; Pierce v. Banton, 98 Maine, 553; Emerson v. Shores, 95 Maine, 237; Banton v. Shorey, 77 Maine, 48; Claflin v. Carpenter, 4 Met. 580 ; Drake v. Wells, 11 Allen, 141 ; White v.

Moulton v. Brown

627 A.2d 521 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 30, 1993

alleged negligence of the Browns. … Mockus v. Melanson, 615 A.2d 245, 247 (Me.1992).

Brown v. Fessenden

81 Me. 522 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 20, 1889

Kimball v. Sumner, 62 Maine, 305.

Burnham v. Brown

23 Me. 400 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 15, 1844

In Tucker v. Randall, 2 Mass. R. 283, which was an action upon a note payable in several instalments, for the recovery of the whole amount, commenced after a part, but before all the instalments became due, Mr. … Cooley v. Rose, 3 Mass. R. 226 , and Hastings v. Wiswell, 8 Mass. R. 455 , were actions for interest, which accrued before the principal became due, and .were maintained.

Brown v. DeNormandie

123 Me. 535 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 26, 1924

Edwards, 86 Maine, 102; Brown v. Gerald, 100 Maine, 351; Opinion of Justices, 118 Maine at 516. *542 3. Reservoir Dams; The Mill Act includes reservoir dams as well, as working dams. … Wolcott v. Upham, 5 Pick., 292 ; Shaw v. Wells, 5 Cush., 537 ; Bates *545 v. Weymouth Iron Co., 8 Cush., 548 ; Drake v. Woolen Co., 99 Mass., 574 ; Norton v. Hodges, 100 Mass., 241 .

Brown v. Staples

28 Me. 497 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 15, 1848

Clark v. Swift, 3 Metc. 390 ; Beddoe v. Wadsworth, 21 Wend. 120 ; Young v. Triplett, 5 Litt. 248 . … Hardy v. Nel *503 son, 27 Maine R. 525; Hubbard v. Norton, 10 Conn. R. 422; Haynes v. Stevens, 11 N. H. R. 28.

Brown v. Foster

31 L.R.A. 116 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 29, 1895

"Section three provides that the mayor 'shall preside in the board of aldermen and joint meetings of the two boards but shall have only a casting vote.’ … "The provision that the mayor 'shall preside in the board of aldermen and joint meetings of the two boards but shall have *52 only a casting vote’ is found in precisely the same language in every city charter in the State

State v. Brown

302 A.2d 322 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 22, 1973

State v. McKeough, Me., 300 A.2d 755 (Opinion, February 28, 1973); State v. Collins, Me, 297 A.2d 620, 631 (1972). … State v.

Brown v. Leavitt

26 Me. 251 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 15, 1846

But then he forfeits his obligation, he has given to abide the award. 1 Dane’s Abr. 277, c. 13, art. 14, § 15; Vynior’s case, 8 Co. 162, 3d Resolution; Milne & al. v. Gratrix, 7 East, 608; Warburton v. … . & C. 103; King v. Joseph, 5 Taunt. 452. But if the submission be by deed, the revocation can be by deed only. Caldwell on Arbitration, 35.

Martin v. Brown

650 A.2d 937 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 5, 1994

Id. 78 Me. at 267 , 4 A. 412 (citing Bacheller v. Pinkham, 68 Me. 253, 255 (1878)). … Walsh v. Johnston, 608 A.2d 776, 778 (Me.1992); Guilmet v. Galvin, 597 A.2d 1348, 1349-50 (Me.1991).

Warchalowski v. Brown

417 A.2d 425 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 14, 1980

3001 authorizes the unconstitutional taking of private property for a nonpublic use was expressly rejected by the Law Court in Browne v. … Co. v.

Willey v. Brown

390 A.2d 1039 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 15, 1978

In Salvato v. … Plaintiff alleged in his complaint that defendant Brown, d/b/a Brown’s ESSO Station, sold the lawnmower to plaintiffs grandfather and, that it was manufactured by defendant Worcester Lawnmower Co., a division of defendant

Whitmore v. Brown

100 Me. 410 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 3, 1905

Proctor v. Maine Central R. R., supra. … Brackett v. Persons Unknown, 58 Maine, 228. Richardson v. Watts, 94 Maine, 476. But that is not this case.

Maxwell v. Brown

39 Me. 98 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1855

In Balding v. … In Hunt v.

Lunt v. Brown

13 Me. 236 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 15, 1836

In Ward v. Macauley et al. 4 T. R. 480, the plaintiff had let to Lord Montfort a ready furnished house, and the lease contained a schedule of the furniture. … The same doctrine was recognized in Putnam v. Wyley, 8 Johns. R. 432, and in Clark v. Carlton, 1 N. H. 110.