Case law

Brown v. State

568 S.W.3d 312 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Jan 23, 2019

Hall v. State , 2018 Ark. App. 474 , 561 S.W.3d 333 . … s testimony that she heard Brown say he "was going to put that on the dogs" was an impermissible reference to Brown's membership in a gang. Brown cites Jackson v.

State v. Brown

21 Kan. 38 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jul 15, 1878

(State v. McCormick, 27 Iowa, 402 ; State v. Watkins, 27 Iowa, 415 ; Bower v. The State, 5 Mo. 364 ; State v. Jones, 20 Mo. 58 ; State v. Reaky, 1 Mo. Appeal, 3; Fouts v. The State, 8 Ohio St. 98 ; Kain v. … Brown and Thomas Craig then and there in their right hands held.”

Brown v. Nisler

179 Ark. 178 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 11, 1929

True, this, court held in Taaffe v. Sanderson, 173 Ark. 970 , 294 S. … In Storey v.

Polk v. Brown

117 Ark. 321 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 8, 1915

In the case of Donahue v. … See, also, Petty v. Grisard, 45 Ark. 117 . In the case of Bell v.

Brown v. State

368 Ark. 344 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 4, 2007

See Brown v. State, 95 Ark. App. 348 , 237 S.W.3d 95 (2006). When we grant a petition for review, this court reviews the case as if the appeal had originally been filed in this court. Stewart v. … Camargo v. State, 346 Ark. 118 , 55 S.W.3d 255 (2001).

Brown v. State

143 Ark. 523 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 26, 1920

Then, too, Baker had a conversation with Brown shortly after the robbery with regard to it, and the jury might have inferred from what Brown said that he had carried the parties to the scene of the robbery. … Dunmore v. State (Ala.), 22 So. 541 . The remarks of the prosecuting attorney were similar to the remarks of counsel held prejudicial in Fort v. State, 74 Ark. 210 , and German-American Ins. Co. v. Harper, 70 Ark. 305 .

Brown v. State

315 Ark. 466 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 10, 1994

Pilcher v. State, 303 Ark. 335 , 796 S.W.2d 845 (1990). … See Bennett v. State, 302 Ark. 179 , 789 S.W.2d 436 , cert. denied, 498 U.S. 851 (1990). In sum, appellant Brown’s assignments of error are without merit.

Brown v. Hardy

95 Ark. 123 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 16, 1910

Wallace v. St. Louis, I. M. & S. Ry. Co., 83 Ark. 359 ; Files v. Law, 88 Ark. 449 ; Haglin v. Atkinson-Williams Hardware Co., 93 Ark. 85 .

Cates v. Brown

278 Ark. 242 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 24, 1983

Appellee Roy Brown was the operator of a logging truck belonging to appellee Gaylor Thomas. … Boyd v. Brown, 257 Ark. 445 , 373 S.W.2d 711 (1963). However, the second phase of this point was preserved.

Brown v. State

262 Ark. 298 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 17, 1977

Ball v. State, 48 Ark. 94 , 2 S.W. 462 (1886); Hudley v. State, 36 Ark. 237 (1880). … Brown testified that he was in Memphis at the time of the robbery. His sister was called to testify that Brown telephoned her that evening and said that he was in Memphis.

Dean v. Brown

216 Ark. 761 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 6, 1950

That they desire to adopt Nettie Brown Bond, a female minor child of C._ W. … The case of Morris v.

Brown v. State

373 Ark. 453 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · May 15, 2008

Appellant, Richard Brown, by and through his attorney, David O. Bowden, moves this court to file a belated brief. After a final extension, Brown’s brief was due on April 23, 2008. … Wertz v. State, 373 Ark. 260 , 284 S.W.3d 481 (2008) (citing Stewart v. State, 319 Ark. 242 , 889 S.W.2d 771 (1995)). However, good cause must be shown to grant the motion. Id. (citing Strom v.

Brown v. State

231 Ark. 363 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Dec 14, 1959

In Hamm v. State, 214 Ark. 171 , 214 S. … In Tignor v. State, 76 Ark. 489 , 89 S.

Brown v. State

264 Ark. 944 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jan 29, 1979

Prior to the rape trial of Johnny Charles Brown, the State filed a motion in limine, seeking to prohibit any mention of prior sexual conduct between the prosecuting witness and Brown. … From the trial court’s interlocutory ruling that the prior sexual contact between appellant and the prosecutrix was not relevant to Brown’s defense of consent, Brown brings this appeal pursuant to Ark. Stat.

Brown v. State

259 Ark. 464 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Mar 8, 1976

In Finley v. … In Keith v.

A.R. v. Brown

103 Ark. App. 1 · Court of Appeals of Arkansas · Jun 18, 2008

Brown declined. … Hurtt v. Hurtt, 93 Ark. App. 37 , 216 S.W.3d 604 (2005).

Brown v. State

248 Ark. 561 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 20, 1970

Lyle Brown, Justice. Herbert Lee Brown appeals from a conviction on a charge of illegal possession of narcotics. … The question was raised in Rodriguez v.

Hinton v. Brown

174 Ark. 1025 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 27, 1927

This suit was brought by appellee, Brown, against appellant, Hinton, to recover on notes signed “Hinton Garage, L. T. … In the case of Dodd v. Axle-Nut Sign Co., 126 Ark. 14 , 189 S.

Sanders v. Brown

65 Ark. 498 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Oct 8, 1898

Brown that we will forever warrant and defend the title to said lands against all lawful claims whatsoever, except the taxes of the year 1893, which the grantee is to pay.” … Such is the position assumed in Blackie v. Hudson, 117 Mass. 181 . A seemingly contrary doctrine is put forth in Dowdny v. Mayor, etc., of New York, 55 N.

Brown v. State

28 Ark. 126 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Jun 15, 1873

Frank talked to Brown, but he used abusive language, and the constable commanded the peace, and arrested Brown. … ) was in the possession of the two bales of cotton charged to have been taken by Brown from the possession of Jacob Frank.”