Case law

Lautzenhiser Technologies, LLC v. Sunrise Medical HHG, Inc.

752 F. Supp. 2d 988 · District Court, S.D. Indiana · Nov 8, 2010

John clearly had high hopes for the product. … A: I — I became — in 2004 I — I was seeing the current reversal that I would say — I’ll qualify that, that any manufacturer using a pulse with modulated controller that was shorting the fets [sic, FETS] between power pulses

Snyder v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC

District Court, N.D. Indiana · Aug 11, 2022

the Release were ambiguous as to claims for attorney fees and costs, Plaintiffs cannot succeed on those claims as a matter of law because they cannot meet the prevailing party requirement of the applicable statutes to qualify … Jayco posits that even as a non-signatory to the Release, the terms of the Release applied thereby releasing it from any liability for Plaintiffs’ claims, which clearly arise from their experiences with the RV.

Katelin Eunjoo Seo v. State of Indiana

Indiana Supreme Court · Jun 23, 2020

And if law enforcement wants to get into a smartphone for reasons other than prosecution, they can offer immunity to the device’s owner. See Doe I, 465 U.S. at 614–15. … Although the issue in this case is clearly one of great public importance and will surely recur with other defendants, it will not evade review.

BROOKS v. DUDEK

District Court, S.D. Indiana · Mar 13, 2025

It is well-established that review of the ALJ's opinion is subject to a very differential standard, and the ALJ need only "minimally articulate" her rationale. Elder v. … The RFC clearly contained aspects of Dr. Sprinkle's opinion, appropriately reflecting the ALJ's decision that the opinion was "somewhat" persuasive. For example, Dr.

Orr v. Carter

District Court, N.D. Indiana · May 3, 2021

court must review the merits of a prisoner complaint and dismiss it if the action is frivolous or malicious, fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, or seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is immune … CBT is a type of talk therapy that “helps you become aware of inaccurate or negative thinking so you can view challenging situations more clearly and respond to them in a more effective way.” https://www.mayoclinic.org/

Reiber v. Mathew

271 F. Supp. 3d 968 · District Court, N.D. Indiana · Sep 25, 2017

Mathew and the Amended Com-' plaint fails to establish the necessary elements for a respondeat superior theory that would impute liability to the corporate defendants. Id., p. 8. … In Barnett, the court held that an employer whose employee’s authorized duties included determining whether individuals qualified for public aid could not be held liable for that employee’s sexual assault of a client because

Wilmington Trust, National Association v. 410 South Main Street LLC

District Court, N.D. Indiana · Feb 7, 2022

While the Balance Statement is clearly in writing, which satisfies the first element under the ILLA, it fails to satisfy the second and third elements. … Each missed payment qualified as an Event of Default under the terms of the Note. (DE 48-1 at 11; DE 48-2 at 83–84.)

Jeffery Alholm v. Rebecca (Alholm) Allen

Indiana Court of Appeals · Jul 30, 2012

FILED Pursuant to Ind.Appellate Rule 65(D), this Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of Jul 30 2012, 9:13 am establishing the defense … Only one of the post- dissolution court’s findings denominated as such, finding paragraph 76, qualifies as a finding of fact relevant to the modification of custody.

THOMSON v. ROCHE DIAGNOSTICS CORPORATION

District Court, S.D. Indiana · Feb 14, 2024

Notwithstanding Roche's internal dispute resolution procedures, the ICP Policy sub- mitted with Roche's Answer states clearly, at the bottom of each page, that it became effec- tive on May 25, 2022. … App. 1983) (written retirement plan does not qualify as a written employment contract).

HARDIN v. United States

District Court, S.D. Indiana · Aug 10, 2020

If a petitioner cannot establish one of the Strickland prongs, the court need not consider the other. Groves v. United States, 755 F.3d 588, 591 (7th Cir. 2014). … Failed to appeal the sentence even though the Court clearly indicated that the right to appeal the sent[e]nce was still available.

Alderson v. Ferrellgas, Inc.

127 F. Supp. 3d 937 · District Court, N.D. Indiana · Aug 31, 2015

She argues that “[tjhis immediate response from HR clearly evidences a causal connection between the two. … But “personal preference is not sufficient to establish an adverse action ...

Fidishin v. Gary Community School Corporation

District Court, N.D. Indiana · Feb 2, 2022

Moore “very clearly said that [the Plaintiff] had mismanaged the ESL program in front of everybody and said, therefore, Ms. Bowman-Beckwith will be taking responsibility for that.” Id. at 95:5–9. Dr. … Gordon’s work history, the Plaintiff provides no evidence that she was more qualified than Mr. Gordon or Dr. Pruitt to oversee transportation and security.

Wayne v. Superior Air-Ground Ambulance Service Inc

District Court, N.D. Indiana · Sep 22, 2023

A few weeks later, Wayne claims she learned via email that she was “left out of a serious employee disciplinary matter” that “was clearly part of [her] duties and role.” … In that distinct procedural context, the Seventh Circuit reaffirmed that an outright denial of benefits is not necessary to establish a triable interference claim.

Schuler v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, N.D. Indiana · Aug 26, 2022

[b]ut a diagnosis alone does not establish the existence of an impairment.”) (citing Weaver v. Berryhill, 746 F. … On remand, the ALJ must account for Plaintiff’s migraines in the RFC, or clearly explain why they do not need to be accounted for. III.

Micronet, Inc. v. Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission

866 N.E.2d 278 · Indiana Court of Appeals · May 10, 2007

The FCC has stressed the purpose of a service in determining whether a service qualifies as a basic service or an information service. … In the Reconsideration, we found Dial-it to “constitute more than the common carrier offering of a channel of communication and [therefore to] clearly fall outside the scope of a basic service.”

Pratt Logistics, LLC v. United Transport Inc

District Court, N.D. Indiana · Mar 10, 2022

Considering this definition, United argues that “most of [these words] are clearly inapplicable to the facts as pled.” [DE 58 at 13.] … If “the Plaintiff can’t establish conversion, it necessarily can’t establish theft either.” 14 Dillinger, LLC v.

BITNER v. KIJAKAZI

District Court, S.D. Indiana · Jan 26, 2022

STANDARD OF REVIEW To qualify for disability, a claimant must be disabled within the meaning of the Social Security Act. … In the decision, the ALJ clearly identifies Ms. Owens as Tiffany's primary care provider and includes her assessment of Ms.

Molina

District Court, N.D. Indiana · Mar 10, 2026

Texas, 597 U.S. 785, 787 (2022) (noting the Supreme Court “has repeatedly observed that the word ‘may’ clearly connotes discretion”) (cleaned up); Gonzalez v. … The second factor considers whether Congress has established a timetable for the agency’s action to “supply content” to the rule of reason. TRAC, 750 F.2d at 80.

Winters v. Hendrix

District Court, N.D. Indiana · Mar 13, 2024

See Reed, 178 F.3d at 855 (where inmate complained about severe deprivations but was ignored, he established a “prototypical case of deliberate indifference.”). … He does not clearly allege how this policy caused his injury, and instead his amended complaint describes failings by Dr. Wala and the other staff members who evaluated him.

Stillwater of Crown Point Homeowner's Ass'n v. Stiglich

999 F. Supp. 2d 1111 · District Court, N.D. Indiana · Feb 26, 2014

Given the opportunity to present the supporting evidence that will clearly illustrate my position.” (Def. Resp., p. 2). … Stiglich discharged pollutants; (3) from a point source; (4) into streams or wetlands that qualify as jurisdictional “waters of the United States;” (5) without a permit or other statutory authorization for such discharge