Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersLA

10,000+ results

1.91s

  • Dowden v. Miller

    415 So. 2d 283 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Apr 13, 1982

    However, our examination of the record reveals that the evidence clearly supports the determination that Miller was not negligent. … LIABILITY OF CHARTER NATIONAL Plaintiff failed to establish at trial that John Edward was uninsured or underin-sured at the time of the accident.

    Reversed on other grounds by Dowden v. Miller, 1982 La. LEXIS 12237 (1982)Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Matter of Succession of Sims

    464 So. 2d 991 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Feb 26, 1985

    The first element, i.e., the thing demanded, was not established by the stipulated facts. … "However, the bill as finally passed was clearly a compromise proposal.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Frank Alaimo v. Racetrack at Evangeline Downs, Inc.

    Louisiana Court of Appeal · Feb 2, 2005

    or contributing to the injury, death, or loss shall be determined, regardless of whether the person is a party to the action or a nonparty, and regardless of the person’s insolvency, ability to pay, immunity … Here, the plaintiff established that the horse was lost. 1 The plaintiff explained that, in a race won by the horse, the successful jockey is paid ten percent of the horse’s earnings.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Opinion Number

    Louisiana Attorney General Reports · May 16, 2003

    GASB-14 clearly notes that an interest in the remaining assets of an entity when liquidated is not considered to provide the government entity with access to the entity's resources. j. … We are not qualified, nor do we have sufficient first hand information, to make such a determination.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Donna D. Johnson, Et Ux. v. State of Louisiana, Dept. of Transportation & Development

    Louisiana Court of Appeal · Feb 15, 2012

    We are compelled to review the record in its entirety to determine whether the jury‟s finding was clearly wrong or manifestly erroneous. Id. … His own testimony demonstrates that he is indeed qualified to be an expert on that subject, and has been qualified as such by courts in the past.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • State of Louisiana v. Jarvis Ballard

    Louisiana Court of Appeal · Jul 21, 2021

    (2) The factual circumstances establishing the timeliness of the application. … Clearly, because the claim of ineffective assistance of counsel in the instant application is predicated on a new substantive claim, it was error for the district court to dismiss it as impermissibly repetitive.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Quinn v. State, Through Dept. of Highways

    464 So. 2d 357 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Feb 1, 1985

    3) Was Sylvanus Walker qualified as an expert in accident reconstruction and was his explanation based on the evidence? … The State devoted some eleven pages of its brief in an attempt to establish that Mr. Walker's conclusions were not valid.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • State v. Monette

    758 So. 2d 362 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Mar 22, 2000

    . *364 New Orleans Police Department Criminalist Corey Hall was qualified by stipulation as an expert in the field of forensic chemistry. Mr. … Finally, the State did not provide evidence establishing that the defendant had in any way attempted to obtain cocaine.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Trascher v. Territo

    89 So. 3d 357 · Supreme Court of Louisiana · May 8, 2012

    Clearly, if a witness provides testimony at trial but the opposing party never is given the opportunity to cross-examine him, there would be grounds to strike the testimony given. Further, the reference in La. … In this case, a scheduled deposition taken because the deponent was not expected to live more than six months does not qualify under the dying declaration exception. Mr.

    Cited 34 timesPublished
  • King v. Mason

    95 So. 2d 705 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Jun 28, 1957

    We are of the opinion that the facts in this case bring it clearly within the exception to the rule * * *." … The authority cited is clearly inapplicable to the situation here. As pointed out heretofore, Mason handled no products.

    Cited 26 timesPublished
  • State v. Griffin

    540 So. 2d 1144 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Feb 28, 1989

    The record clearly establishes that the trial court did not consider the motion in question and defendant did not re-urge the motion in question. … Darwin Givins' testimony about the victim's last statements was admissible because the statements would qualify as "excited utterances" and "dying declarations." See, State v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Ryan v. Blount Bros. Const., Inc.

    927 So. 2d 1242 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Apr 19, 2006

    The coverage issues involved included whether the employer's failure to become a qualified self-insurer rendered the excess insurance policy invalid; whether the employer's failure to become a qualified self-insurer precluded … Frazier, although qualified as an insurance agent, was not licensed as a solicitor for the Gibson agency.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Proshee v. Shree, Inc.

    893 So. 2d 939 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Feb 2, 2005

    This exclusion applies to all individuals or entities qualifying as an insured under Section II — Who Is An Insured, including any and all Additional Insureds." EXCLUSION — ASSAULT AND BATTERY 1. … exclusion would apply regardless of who committed the battery, the Court found that the insurer was required to show the lack of a genuine factual dispute that plaintiff's injuries resulted from an intentional tort in order to establish

    Cited 16 timesPublished
  • Deville v. LaGrange

    379 So. 2d 37 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Mar 21, 1980

    The evidence clearly preponderates, then, in favor of plaintiff being the father of the child." … Donald Ray admitted that he collaborated with Marie (by helping her rent an apartment) in order that Marie and the child would qualify for welfare payments as support.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Spiers v. Consolidated Companies, Inc.

    125 So. 2d 795 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Mar 21, 1960

    The rule established in the Rottman case was extended in Jackson v. … Such statements had been made without qualification, and what we held in the Rottman case was 'that such statements were too broad, and we qualified the rule by holding that, when a defendant sees another in peril of which

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • State v. Monk

    454 So. 2d 421 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Aug 10, 1984

    BY THE COURT: I rule that he's qualified." Defendant contends that the refusal of the challenge for cause by the trial judge of Mr. Steadman was in error. … BY THE COURT: I think the Voir Dire examination speaks clearly for itself on the relationship and how she will act as a juror.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Istre v. Meche

    916 So. 2d 307 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Nov 2, 2005

    They argued that Officer Buchanan was not negligent and that he and the City of Rayne were immune from liability pursuant to La.R.S. 9:2798.1(B). Plaintiffs opposed the motion. … I find that there are clearly genuine issues of material fact that must be determined by a trier of fact at a trial on the merits and that summary judgment is not appropriate at this stage of the proceedings.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Sims-Smith, Ltd. v. Stokes

    466 So. 2d 480 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Feb 11, 1985

    Defendant, who contracted to advise plaintiff in the development, opening and establishment of the store, has appealed. … We find no error in the trial judge's refusal to qualify as an expert the witness defendant offered to prove the value of her services. That individual, Ms.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Waller v. State, Department of Health & Hospitals

    11 La.App. 3 Cir. 643 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Nov 9, 2011

    and, 2) does the record indicate that the finding was clearly wrong? Id. … “A contract is formed by the consent of the parties established through offer and acceptance.” La.Civ.Code art. 1927.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Sea Robin Pipeline Co. v. NEW MEDICO CLINIC

    809 So. 2d 176 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Jun 22, 2001

    The Medico records, however, clearly show that he reported incidents of other patients frightening him, [5] and the sworn statement of Mrs. Fage reveals he reported such incidents to *180 her. Furthermore, Dr. … reliability tests, and further, the experts should not be permitted to relate their opinions on the credibility of the non-testifying incompetent witness. *184 Testimony on credibility has the effect of putting an impressively qualified

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.