Case law

ASEA/AFSCM Local 52 health v. St. Jude Med., LLC

362 F. Supp. 3d 642 · District Court, D. Maine · Jan 24, 2019

Jude actively concealed information about the defect from its management boards, the FDA, and the public. Id. ¶¶ 29-31, 89-91. … In [ Riegel v.

HARRIMAN v. MCCUE

District Court, D. Maine · Apr 26, 2023

Dewey v. Univ. of N.H., 694 F.2d 1, 3 (1st Cir. 1982). Therefore, “even pro se litigants must do more than make mere conclusory statements regarding constitutional claims.” Brown v. … Saenz v. Roe, 526 U.S. 489, 500 (1999).

Kelly, Remmel & Zimmerman v. Stone

Superior Court of Maine · Jan 6, 2016

Samsara Memorial Trust v. Kelly, Remmel & Zimmerman, 2014 ME 107. This case was remanded for determination of damages. … This amount was determined by the Fee Arbitration Commission of the Board of Bar Overseers in June 2012. The value of the transferred property is $170,000, based on tax assessment of the property.

Hutchins v. Ford

82 Me. 363 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 19, 1890

Liverpool Steam Co. v. Phoenix Ins. Co., 129 *371 U. S. 397 ; Orient Ins. Co. v. Adams, 123 U. S. 67 ; General Mutual Ins. Co. v. Sherwood, 14 How. 351 ; Waters v. … The testimony is conflicting as to what took place on board the brig after the master came on deck, but indicates the conditions before stated.

Givertz v. Maine Medical Center

459 A.2d 548 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 26, 1983

In Dougherty v. … Again, in Michaud v.

Seacoast Modular Homes, Inc. v. Dalzell, Jr.

Superior Court of Maine · Jan 27, 2022

Watt v. UniFirst Corp., 2009 ME 47, ¶ 21, 969 A.2d 897. … Emery Lee & Sons, Inc. v. Acadia Ins. Grp., LLC, 2016 Me. Super. LEXIS 38, *12 (citing Cach LLC v.

Bookland of Maine v. Baker, Newman & Noyes, LLC

271 F. Supp. 2d 324 · District Court, D. Maine · Aug 1, 2003

Forrestal v. Magendantz, 848 F.2d 303, 309 (1st Cir.1988) (quoting City of Cleveland v. … See, e.g., Smith v. Kmart Corp., 177 F.3d 19, 27-28 (1st Cir.1999); United States v. Machar, 879 F.2d 945, 955-56 (1st Cir.1989); United States v. Doe, 860 F.2d 488, 494-95 (1st Cir.1988); Forrestal v.

Morgan v. Hatch

118 F.R.D. 6 · District Court, D. Maine · Nov 25, 1987

Flower v. … Pursuant to Local Rule 5(e)(1) of this Court, this opinion will be forwarded to counsel for the Maine Board of Overseers of the Bar for its investigation of Mr.

JOLLY

District Court, D. Maine · Mar 12, 2026

Liteky v. United States, 510 U.S. 540, 555 (1994); United States v. Medoff, 159 F.4th 107, 123 (1st Cir. 2025); Olszewski v. Hutchins, No. 1:24-cv-00209- JAW, 2026 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15326, at *34 (D. Me. … Colin has an undefined affiliation with the Vermont Board of Nursing. Id. at 11-12. But, as the Magistrate Judge pointed out in her Recommended Decision, Dr.

Testa's, Inc. v. Coopersmith

Superior Court of Maine · Nov 22, 2013

Brown Development Corp. v. Hemond, 2008 ME 146, ~ 11, 956 A. 2d 104, 108 (citing, Wells Fargo Horne Mortgage, Inc., v. Spaulding, 2007 ME 116, ~ 20,930 A.2d 1025, 1030; Dehahn v. Innes, 356 A.2d 711,717 (Me. 1976)). … ("almost any writing is sufficient for statute of frauds purposes" Brown Development Corp., 2008 ME 146, ~ 12). 7 In Chapman v.

United States v. Dethlefs

883 F. Supp. 766 · District Court, D. Maine · Apr 6, 1995

In Sgro v. … Id. at 923 , 104 S.Ct. at 3421 (quoting Brown v. Illinois, 422 U.S. 590, 610-11 , 95 S.Ct. 2254, 2265 , 45 L.Ed.2d 416 (1975) (Powell, J., concurring in part)).

Lagasse v. Hannaford Bros. Co.

497 A.2d 1112 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 30, 1985

As stated in Bernard v. … Co. v.

State of Maine v. Donna Pagnani

2018 ME 129 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 30, 2018

See State v. … State v.

Martin v. Somerset County

387 F. Supp. 2d 65 · District Court, D. Maine · Sep 16, 2005

City of Detroit, 399 F.3d 612, 616 (6th Cir.2005); Woloszyn v. County of Lawrence, 396 F.3d 314, 322-23 (3d Cir.2005); Cagle v. Sutherland, 334 F.3d 980, 989-90 (11th Cir.2003); Brown v. … See Brown v. Harris, 240 F.3d 383 , 389 & n. 6 (4th Cir.2001) (collecting cases); Jacobs v. West Feliciana Sheriff's Dept., 228 F.3d 388, 393 (5th Cir.2000); but see Snow v.

Swett v. Sanford/Springvale VFW Post 9935

Superior Court of Maine · Apr 26, 2016

Bean v. … See Fortin v. Roman Catholic Bishop ofPortland, 2005 ME 57, ~ 39, 87 1 A.2d 1208 (citing R estatement (Second) of Torts, § 3 l 5(b )). 3 In support of duty, plaintiff cites Brown v.

JONES v. PORTLAND MAINE POLICE DEPARTMENT

District Court, D. Maine · Jul 7, 2022

See Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 324 (1989). … Comm’rs of Bryan Cnty. v.

VanLee Corp. v. Madden

Superior Court of Maine · Dec 5, 2000

Madden RUFUS BROWN, ESQ. (ALL DEFS) VS. … Madden DEC iz 2000 RUFUS BROWN, ESQ. (ALL DEFS) VS.

Dempsey v. National Enquirer

702 F. Supp. 927 · District Court, D. Maine · Dec 20, 1988

Lacy v. … Muratore v.

United States of America v. Maine Department of Education

District Court, D. Maine · Dec 22, 2025

.”); Cohen v. … .”); Reno v. Am.

Clifford v. McCafferty

Superior Court of Maine · May 11, 2000

GARBRECHT AY 18 2000 v : LAW Itc. - ORDER ; CUMBERLAND LEGAL AID CLINIC NORMAN H. McCAFFERTY and yay 197 graq — JOAN E. … In determining the loss suffered by the plaintiffs, both the number of board feet and the actual trees must be considered. The cutting that was done resulted in two areas of the ugliness that follows virtual clear cuts.