Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
0.78s
Rural Development Innovations Limited v. Marocco
District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 1, 2025
The statute vests the management of USADF in a Board of Directors (“Board”). See id. § 290h-5(a)(1). … Bowen v.
Cited 0 timesPublished305 A.2d 256 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 1, 1973
They discovered a brown coin purse which contained 11 tinfoil packets of what proved to be 2-percent heroin, and a wrapper which contained a needle and a syringe. … United States v. Mechanic, 454 F.2d 849 (8th Cir. 1971), cert. denied, 406 U.S. 929 , 92 S.Ct. 1765 , 32 L.Ed.2d 131 (1972); United States v.
Cited 18 timesPublishedBrotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Certain Carriers, Etc.
349 F.2d 207 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 24, 1965
Trainmen v. … Fire. & Eng. v. Chicago, B. & Q. R.
Cited 8 timesPublishedBloch, Felix S. v. Powell, Colin L.
348 F.3d 1060 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 21, 2003
Bloch’s waiver was valid and binding,’’ Bloch v. Albright, 43 F. Supp. 2d 17, 21 (D.D.C. 1999), and thus remanded to the Board. … The Supreme Court’s formulation in Board of Regents of State Colleges v.
Cited 117 timesPublished916 F. Supp. 23 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 20, 1996
To objectively select the best officers to remain in the AGR, the continuation board employs a process similar to that of the promotion board described in Doyle v. … Dilley v. Alexander, 603 F.2d 914, 920 (D.C.Cir.1979).
Cited 10 timesPublishedRichardson v. District of Columbia Redevelopment Land Agency
453 A.2d 118 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 17, 1982
See Board of Elections v. Democratic Central Comm., supra at 728. Cf. Southern Ry. Co. v. Seaboard Allied Milling Corp., 442 U.S. 444, 462 , 99 S.Ct. 2388, 2398 , 60 L.Ed.2d 1017 (1979); Renegotiation Board v. … See Board of Elections v. Democratic Central Comm., supra.
Cited 5 timesPublishedJOSE RODRIGUEZ v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
124 A.3d 134 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 17, 2015
See Freeman v. … Hensley v.
Cited 7 timesPublished709 A.2d 100 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 2, 1998
v. … In Brown the jury had awarded actual damages of some $7,000. See 102 U.S.App. D.C. at 303, 253 F.2d at 39 ; see also Wagman v.
Cited 20 timesPublishedBurton v. Office of Employee Appeals
30 A.3d 789 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 3, 2011
Hoey appealed to the Superior Court, which affirmed the Board’s decision, and this appeal followed. B. Appellant Burton The facts in Burton v. OEA are similar to those in Hoey v. OEA and we summarize them only briefly. … Loudermill, 470 U.S. 532, 538 , 105 S.Ct. 1487 , 84 L.Ed.2d 494 (1985) (quoting Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972)).
Cited 11 timesPublished516 F.2d 1229 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 4, 1975
. § 552 (b)(5) (1970); EPA v. … In Independent Bankers Ass'n v.
Cited 22 timesPublishedCameron v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
649 A.2d 291 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 24, 1994
Id. at 323 (citations omitted); accord, Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority v. Brown, 619 A.2d 1188, 1192 (D.C.1993); see also Brown v. … Techniarts Video, Inc. v. 1631 Kalorama Associates, 572 A.2d 1051, 1054 (D.C.1990) (citation omitted); accord, Taylor v.
Cited 19 timesPublished828 F. Supp. 78 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 5, 1993
Therefore, this case is distinguishable from Brown Shoe and the other cases cited by defendants. … Defendant cites the following cases for this preclusion: Brown Shoe Co. v. United States, 370 U.S. 294, 326 , 82 S.Ct. 1502, 1524 , 8 L.Ed.2d 510 (1962); Liggett & Myers, Inc. v.
Cited 5 timesPublished85 F.2d 202 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 11, 1936
Bryant v. United States (C.C.A.) 214 F. 51 ; Hammers v. United States (C.C.A.) 279 F. 265 . … We have in Egan v.
Cited 43 timesPublishedRoland A. Corley v. United States
365 F.2d 884 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 22, 1966
The only evidence tending to connect appellant with the crimes was Brown’s identification of him. … See De Binder v. United States, Gordan v. United States, and Simmons v. United States, supra. Reversed and remanded for a new trial. . In Cross v.
Cited 12 timesPublished791 F.3d 71 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 23, 2016
The Copyright Royalty Board (Board) sets the terms and conditions of copyright licensing agreements by conducting ratemaking proceedings. See id. at 1334-35 . … See In re Kellogg Brown & Root, Inc., 756 F.3d 754, 762 (D.C.Cir.2014) (“An erroneous district court ruling on an ... issue by itself does not justify mandamus. The error has to be clear.”).
Cited 50 timesPublishedHastings v. Earth Satellite Corp.
628 F.2d 85 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 19, 1980
The Board has clearly taken the view that the repeal of section 14(m) should not be applied retroactively. Davis v. George Hyman Constr. Co., 9 B.R.B.S. 127 (1978); Correia v. … . § 905 (b)); Drachenberg v. Canal Barge Co., 571 F.2d 912 (5th Cir. 1978) (same). . See Addison v.
Cited 52 timesPublishedSeabulk Transmarine I, Inc. v. Dole
645 F. Supp. 196 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 9, 1986
In Moore-McCormack Lines, Inc. v. … Ass’n v.
Cited 5 timesPublished442 F.2d 847 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 23, 1971
The Board’s decisions are subject to review in the District Court. McCloskey v. Scrivener, 238 F.Supp. 497 (D.D.C.1965). … Connor v.
Cited 33 timesPublished606 F. Supp. 2d 4 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 25, 2009
Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544 , 127 S.Ct. 1955, 1965 , 167 L.Ed.2d 929 (2007); Kowal v. … Miller v. Florida, 482 U.S. 423, 430 , 107 S.Ct. 2446 , 96 L.Ed.2d 351 (1987); see also Collins v.
Cited 12 timesPublishedDurant v. District of Columbia Government
932 F. Supp. 2d 53 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 25, 2013
See Durant v. … Faragher v.
Cited 11 timesPublished
Ask Donna