Case law

United States Institute of Peace v. Jackson

District Court, District of Columbia · May 19, 2025

In Myers v. … See Ryder v.

Novacare, Inc. v. Thompson

357 F. Supp. 2d 268 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 7, 2005

The analysis, therefore, is limited , to determining whether the Board’s decision was “rational and based on a consideration of the relevant factors.” FCC v. … Co. v. FCC, 22 F.3d 320, 326 (D.C.Cir.1994).

Jerry Dwayne Baxter v. Graham W. Claytor, Jr., Secretary of the Navy

652 F.2d 181 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 24, 1981

Although technically the Board may lack the ability to invalidate or overrule a court-martial conviction, see Goldstein v. … See, e. g., McNeese v. Board of Education, 373 U.S. 668 , 674—76, 83 S.Ct. 1433, 1437-38 , 10 L.Ed.2d 622 (1963); Sholly v. United States Nuclear Regulatory Comm’n, 651 F.2d 780 , at 791 n.28 (D.C.Cir. 1980).

Wells v. Reynolds

4 App. D.C. 43 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 20, 1894

Morgan v. Daniels, 67 O. G. 811 ; 153 U. S., 120, 123 . … It is true, in explanation of the delay in making his application for a patent, he says that he was advised by Wells and Brown not to make application.

Jo Spence v. DVA

109 F.4th 531 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 23, 2024

Claiming the action was retaliatory, Spence challenged her termination before the Merit Systems Protection Board (“MSPB”). … Appellant Br. 10 (quoting Brown v. Whole Foods Mkt. Grp., Inc., 789 F.3d 146, 152 (D.C. Cir. 2015) (per curiam) (cleaned up)).

In re Awuah

754 A.2d 948 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 29, 2000

[for] failing] to keep proper records regarding the handling of those monies See In re Berger, 737 A.2d 1033, 1038 (D.C.1999) (quoting Attorney Grievance Comm’n v. … Awuah has not filed any opposition to the Board’s report and recommendation. We accept the Board’s recommendation.

Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul and Pacific Railroad Company (Lines East)

345 F.2d 985 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 15, 1965

We upheld the Boards authority to delegate the crew consist issue to special boards in Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen v. Chicago, B. & Q. R. … Schechter Poultry Corp. v.

Barry W. Wolfe v. John O. Marsh, Jr., Secretary of the Army

835 F.2d 354 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 18, 1987

Although this power is a discretionary one, the Correction Board is not without guidance. The Correction Board can only exercise its discretion for the benefit of the individual member. Doyle v. … Henderson v.

Jackson v. United States

819 A.2d 963 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 27, 2003

See State v. … The court in People v.

Kornitzky Group, LLC v. Daniel Elwell

929 F.3d 737 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 12, 2019

Both Kornitzky Group and the FAA appealed to the Board. See Elwell v. Kornitzky Grp., LLC, NTSB Order No. EA–5840, 2018 WL 2733940 (May 11, 2018) [hereinafter Board Decision]. … The Board did not follow that course. Instead, it “expressly expand[ed] the Board’s ‘willful disregard’ standard from Administrator v. Boardman, Administrator v. Cooper, and Administrator v. Taylor.”

Greene v. Wilson

150 F. Supp. 958 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 29, 1957

It was at this time, upon the abolishment of the Industrial Employment Review Board, and immediately prior to the establishment of the new Boards, that the communication complained of was written in conformity to paragraph … Wong Yang Sung v. McGrath, 1950, 339 U.S. 33, 50 , 70 S.Ct. 445, 454 , 94 L.Ed. 616 . Order accordingly.

Birnberg v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

389 F. Supp. 340 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 14, 1975

Williams v. WMATC, 134 U.S.App.D.C. 342 , 415 F. 2d 922 (1968), cert. denied sub nom. D. C. Transit v. Williams, 393 U.S. 1081 , 89 S.Ct. 860 , 21 L.Ed.2d 773 (1969); Saunders v. WMATA, supra. … Here there is a full administrative record which facilitated review of the Board’s decision by the Court. Thus, there is no necessity in this case for findings or reasons. EDF v.

Bender v. Jordan

570 F. Supp. 2d 37 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 11, 2008

See Bender v. … Bender sought to oust had already resigned from Board); Bender v. Jordan, 439 F.Supp.2d 139 (D.D.C.2006) (granting Mr.

ROBERT M. ALEXANDER v. UNITED STATES

116 A.3d 444 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 11, 2015

Brown v. United States, 900 A.2d 184, 189, 191 (D.C. 2006); see also id.at 188, 189, 190 n.12, 191 (explaining that in light of the 5 Moreover, there is authority that appears to be to the contrary. … See Brown, 900 A.2d at 191.

Johnson v. United States

596 A.2d 980 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 11, 1991

Zanton Brown testified that just before the murder, Bullock had threatened her (Brown) while he had his hand on a pistol in his belt. He told her to move on or else he would “kill [her] ass, too.” … Frightened, Brown hastened away from the area. Linda Young stated that she heard Bullock threaten both Brown and Smith, demanding his money from Smith.

Avocados Plus Inc. v. Johanns

421 F. Supp. 2d 45 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 15, 2006

See Abood v. … .. a local board does not need to demonstrate a compelling state interest every time it spends a taxpayer’s money in ways the taxpayer finds abhorrent.”); see also Board of Regents of University of Wisconsin System v.

Grafton & Upton Railroad Company v. STB

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 5, 2026

Loper Bright Enterprises v. Raimondo, 144 S. Ct. 2244, 2262 (2024). Grafton challenges the Board’s decision on two grounds. … Delaware v. Surface Transportation Board, 859 F.3d 16, 18 (D.C. Cir. 2017) (quoting New York Susquehanna & Western Railway Corp. v. Jackson, 500 F.3d 238, 252 (3d Cir. 2007)).

Jones v. Wainwright

744 F. Supp. 2d 341 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 19, 2010

At the outset, petitioner’s claims arising from the Parole Board’s actions are moot, see Franklin v. … Parole Board. See Sutherland v.

Monzillo v. Biller

735 F.2d 1456 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 1, 1984

See Doe v. … In Crowell v.

Mokhiber v. Davis

537 A.2d 1100 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 17, 1988

Cohen, 733 F.2d 1059, 1066-71 (3d Cir.1984) (as amended) (under first amendment and common law), to the record of administrative proceedings under judicial review, Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. … See also Brown & Williamson, 710 F.2d at 1180-81 ; Newman, 696 F.2d at 801 .