Case law

Reader's Digest Ass'n v. United States Postal Service

501 F. Supp. 126 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 17, 1980

of the Board’s authority. … Virginia Petroleum Jobbers v. FPC, 259 F.2d 921 , 925 (D.C. Cir. 1958).

Boyd v. Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton, LLP

79 F. Supp. 3d 153 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 5, 2015

Carden v. Arkoma Assoc, 494 US. 185, 189 (1990) (holding that limited partnerships do not follow the citizenship rules established for corporations); Johnson-Brown v. 2200 M St. LLC, 257 F. … Brown v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp, 26 F. Supp. 2d 74, 77 (D.D.C. 1998) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted).

Chambers v. Lucas

41 F.2d 299 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 5, 1930

The rule as to computing time in cases of this sort was early announced by the Supreme Court in Sheets v. Selden’s Lessee, 2 Wall. 177, 190 , 17 L. … Florsheim Brothers Dry Goods Co. v. United States, 280 U. S. 453 , 50 S. Ct. 215 , 74 L. Ed. 542 ; Lucas v. Pilliod Lumber Co. (April 14, 1930) 50 S. Ct. 297 , 74 L. Ed. 829 .

Adams v. Federal Aviation Administration

550 F.3d 1174 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 19, 2008

ADAMS, ET AL., PETITIONERS v. … Before: GINSBURG and BROWN, Circuit Judges, and WILLIAMS, Senior Circuit Judge. Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge BROWN.

Sisco v. GSA National Capital Federal Credit Union

689 A.2d 52 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 6, 1997

adoption annually by the newly constituted board. … In Elliott v.

Frank D. Crum v. General Adjustment Bureau and Home Indemnity Company, General Adjustment Bureau and Home Indemnity Company v. Frank D. Crum

738 F.2d 474 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 6, 1984

(“BRB” or “Board”). … But the BRB was not entitled to review this matter de novo; rather, the Board was bound by the AU’s determination if supported by substantial evidence. See Bath Iron Works Corp. v.

Brotherhood of Railway & Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express & Station Employees v. United Transport Service Employees of America

137 F.2d 817 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 2, 1943

From said judgment the Board perfected no appeal, and the intervening Brotherhood is the sole appellant. In Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. … Trainmen v.

Keyworth C. Birch, Jr. v. Sam A. Anderson

358 F.2d 520 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 9, 1965

But we find support in the dicta of the Eighth Circuit in Sprouse v. Settle, 274 F.2d 681 . Since Taylor v. Godwin, supra, relies primarily upon Schiffman v. … We commented upon this problem in Mock v. U. S. Board of Parole, 120 U.S.App.D.C. 248 , 345 F.2d 737 . 4 . Att’y Gen. Survey of Release Procedures 29-31 (1939) herein cited as Survey. 5 . Survey, 493. 6 . H.R.Rep.

Belsinger v. District of Columbia

295 F. Supp. 159 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 22, 1969

Offutt v. United States, 348 U.S. 11, 14 , 75 S.Ct 11 99 L.Ed. 11 (1954). . American Cyanamid Co. v. F. T. C., 363 F.2d 757 (6th Cir. 1966). . Amos Treat & Co. v. S. E. C., 113 U.S. … Continental Box Co. v. N. L. R. B., 113 F.2d 93 (5th Cir. 1940). . Cf., National Lawyer’s Guild v. Brownell, 126 F.Supp. 730 (D.C.D.C.1954). . Lumber Mut. Casualty Ins. Co. of New York v.

Federal Election Commission v. Committee to Elect Lyndon La Rouche

613 F.2d 849 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 19, 1980

Jones v. … In FTC v.

In re Certain Carriers Represented by the Eastern, Western, & Southeastern Carriers' Conference Committees

229 F. Supp. 259 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 11, 1964

arbitrated by that special Board. 1 Two issues were submitted. … Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen and Enginemen v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad Co., 225 F.Supp. 11 . . Affirmed February 20, 1964, 331 F.2d 1020 . . Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen and Enginemen v.

George Smith, Jr. v. United States of America, Johnny B. Rozier, Jr. v. United States

418 F.2d 1120 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 24, 1969

In Ingram v. United States, 122 U.S. … See Irby v. United States, supra, 129 U.S.App.D.C. at 20 , 390 F.2d at 435 . . United States v. Ewell, 383 U.S. 116 , 86 S.Ct. 773 , 15 L.Ed.2d 627 (1966). . Hedgepeth v.

Bowe-Connor v. McDonald

District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 25, 2015

See McMillian v. District of Columbia, No. 05-2127, 2006 WL 6927884, at *1 (D.D.C. Sept. 25, 2006); see also Phelps v. Stomber, 883 F. … Date: February 25, 2015 Ketanji Brown Jackson KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District Judge

District of Columbia v. Mattingly

28 App. D.C. 176 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 19, 1906

In the case of Ferguson v. Fallons, 2 Phila. 168 , the facts were almost identical with the facts in this case. … In the case of Hoffstot v.

Tyler v. District of Columbia Housing Authority

113 F. Supp. 3d 88 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 29, 2015

.; Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). “Threadbare recitals of the elements of a cause of action, supported by mere conclusory statements, do not suffice.” Ashcroft v. … Brown, 2015 WL 3634672, at *5; see also Richardson v. United States, 193 F.3d 545, 548 (D.C.

Mansfield v. Billington

432 F. Supp. 2d 64 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 1, 2006

Macharia v. United States, 334 F.3d 61, 64, 67 (D.C.Cir.2003); Holy Land Found, for Relief & Dev. v. Ashcroft, 333 F.3d 156, 165 (D.C.Cir.2003); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242 . … Stella v. Mineta, 284 F.3d 135, 145 (D.C.Cir.2002) (quoting Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 452 (D.C.Cir.1999)); see also McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792, 802 , 93 S.Ct. 1817 , 36 L.Ed.2d 668 (1973).

Washington Hospital Center v. Butler

384 F.2d 331 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 29, 1967

Rodgers v. Lawson, 83 U.S.App.D.C. 281, 282 , 170 F.2d 157, 158 (1948). See also Brown v. Keaveny, 117 U.S.App.D.C. 117 , 118, 326 F.2d 660, 661 (1963); Quick v. … See also Grubb v. Groover, 62 App.D.C. 305 , 67 F.2d 511 (1933), cert. denied 291 U.S. 660 , 54 S.Ct. 377 , 78 L.Ed. 1052 (1934). . See Brown v.

In Re Dunietz

756 A.2d 437 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 27, 2000

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Dunietz, Misc. No. AG-40 (Md. February 25, 1998) (unpublished order). … In due course the Board on Professional Responsibility (“the Board”) recommended to us that Mr.

American University v. District of Columbia Department of Labor

429 A.2d 1374 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 9, 1981

See Jones v. District Unemployment Compensation Board, D.C.App., 395 A.2d 392 (1978); Green v. District Unemployment Compensation Board, D.C.App., 346 A.2d 252 (1975). … See Williams v. District Unemployment Compensation Board, D.C. App., 383 A.2d 345, 349 (1978); Hickenbottom v. District Unemployment Compensation Board, D.C.App., 273 A.2d 475, 478 (1971).

In Re RAIL FREIGHT FUEL SURCHARGE ANTITRUST LITIGATION

965 F. Supp. 2d 104 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 3, 2013

Cnty., Or. v. … In GATX/Airlog, the court disqualified Mayer Brown & Platt (“Mayer Brown”) from seeking a declaratory judgment on behalf of plaintiff GATX/Airlog (“GATX”), on the basis that a declaratory judgment would have foreclosed