Case law

Kennedy v. Real Estate Commission

202 A.2d 774 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 31, 1964

Functions transferred to the Board of Commissioners. — There are hereby transferred to the Board of Commissioners of the District of Columbia * * * all functions of the following named offices and agencies of the Government … Then on September 19, 1963, the Board of Commissioners amended Part V, Section E, of Reorganization Order No. 59 to state: “E.

District of Columbia v. Totten

5 F.2d 374 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 4, 1925

District of Columbia v. Tyrrell, 41 App. D. C. 463; Brown v. District of Columbia, 29 App. D. C. 273, 25 L. R. A. (N. S.) 98; Coates v. District of Columbia, 42 App. D. C. 194; Jones v. … This rule was recognized as correct in Haag v. Board, etc., 60 Ind. 511 . See 2 Hilliard, Torts, 4th Ed. 387, 388; Stein v. City of Lafayette, 6 Ind. App. 414 ; City of Valparaiso v. Moffit, 12 Ind. App. 250 .”

Yeda Research and Development Co., Ltd. v. Abbott Gmbh & Co. Kg

99 F. Supp. 3d 5 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 15, 2015

V. LEGAL STANDARDS A. Review of Board Decision under 35 U.S.C. § 146 A district court has authority to review a decision by the Board under 35 U.S.C. § 146. … The Board later explained in Scripps Research Inst. v. Genentech, Inc., 2005 Pat. App. LEXIS 19, *37-38 (B.P.A.I.

Rural Development Innovations Limited v. Marocco

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 1, 2025

The statute vests the management of USADF in a Board of Directors (“Board”). See id. § 290h-5(a)(1). … Bowen v.

Lasalle Extension University & Katharine Gibbs School (Inc.) v. Federal Trade Commission

627 F.2d 481 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 5, 1980

See Fenster v. Brown, 617 F.2d at 743 ; Cuneo v. Rumsfeld, 553 F.2d at 1367-68 . … Brown, 617 F.2d at 744 (D.C.Cir.1979) (emphasis added) (quoting Cuneo v. Rumsfeld, 553 F.2d 1360,1365-66 (D.C.Cir.1977)).

Independent Bankers Ass'n of America v. Conover

603 F. Supp. 948 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 27, 1985

Porter Co. v. … In any event, the courts have recognized that the Board’s jurisdiction with respect to matters arising under the BHC Act is paramount. E.g., Board of Governors v.

Headfirst Baseball LLC v. Elwood

999 F. Supp. 2d 199 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 22, 2013

The comments to Rule 1.9 also indicate that the Rule “is intended to incorporate District of Columbia and federal case law defining the ‘substantial relationship’ test,” including Brown v. … Even assuming there is a sufficient factual overlap to satisfy Brown, 486 A.2d at 49, the Court must still consider the remaining two components of Brown, id.; namely, (1) whether it is reasonable to infer that the confidential

United States v. Irvin L. Stevenson, United States of America v. Bernard I. White

424 F.2d 923 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 3, 1970

See generally United States v. Hayward, 136 U.S.App.D.C. 300 , 420 F.2d 142 (Nov. 18, 1969); Gass v. United States, 135 U.S.App.D.C. 11 , 416 F.2d 767 (1969); Gibson v. … In her charge to the jury, the trial judge included the “missing witness char ge.” 1 We are asked now, primarily upon the basis of our recent opinion in Brown v. United States, 134 U.S.App.

International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. Brotherhood of Railway & Steamship Clerks

245 F. Supp. 835 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 30, 1965

not subject to judicial review, Switchmen’s Union of North America v. … Hod Carriers, etc. v.

In re T.M.

577 A.2d 1149 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 16, 1990

Brown, supra, 546 A.2d at 394 n. 2 (quoting standardized jury instruction); United States v. … This is not a case such as Brown, supra, 546 A.2d at 396-97 , or Waterstaat v.

Bloch, Felix S. v. Powell, Colin L.

348 F.3d 1060 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 21, 2003

Bloch’s waiver was valid and binding,’’ Bloch v. Albright, 43 F. Supp. 2d 17, 21 (D.D.C. 1999), and thus remanded to the Board. … The Supreme Court’s formulation in Board of Regents of State Colleges v.

Jefferson-11th Street, LLC v. District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 5, 2020

They rely in part on Carr v. Brown, 395 A.2d 79 (D.C. 1978). See Tenants’ Mot. at 13. There, a property developer wanted to close an alley behind his building to permit more development. Carr, 395 A.2d at 82–83. … Brown, the head of the neighborhood association, opposed the closure before the City Council’s Transportation Committee, the Board of Zoning Adjustment, and the Advisory Neighborhood Council. Id. at 83.

Hogan v. Obama

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 10, 2011

Luczynski has supplied the declaration of Belinda Brown who, as FOIA coordinator for the U.S. … See Brown Decl. [ECF No. 11‐10] ¶¶ 1‐2.

Oncor Elec. Delivery Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

887 F.3d 488 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 13, 2018

NLRB v. Local Union No. 1229, Int’l Board of Elec. Workers, 346 U.S. 464, 472 (1953). … See Tradesmen Int’l, Inc. v. NLRB, 275 F.3d 1137 (D.C. Cir. 2002). The Board properly found the former met here; we now turn to the latter.

Nat'l Treasury Employees Union v. Whipple

636 F. Supp. 2d 63 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 20, 2009

Brown Group, 517 U.S. 544, 546 , 116 S.Ct. 1529 , 134 L.Ed.2d 758 (1996); Int’l Union, United Auto., Aerospace & Agric. Implement Workers of Am. v. Brock, 477 U.S. 274, 287 , 106 S.Ct. 2523 , 91 L.Ed.2d 228 (1986)). Cf. … the petition by the Board[.]” 5 U.S.C. § 1204 (f).

Austin v. Reilly

606 F. Supp. 2d 4 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 25, 2009

Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544 , 127 S.Ct. 1955, 1965 , 167 L.Ed.2d 929 (2007); Kowal v. … Miller v. Florida, 482 U.S. 423, 430 , 107 S.Ct. 2446 , 96 L.Ed.2d 351 (1987); see also Collins v.

Hunt v. United States Department of Agriculture

740 F. Supp. 2d 41 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 23, 2010

.”); Harrison v. … See LeBlanc v.

Local 58, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, AFL-CIO v. NLRB

888 F.3d 1313 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 8, 2018

Union of Elevator Constructors Local Union No. 8 v. NLRB, 665 F.2d 376, 382 (D.C. Cir. 1981).  7 In Scofield v. … The Board relied on Newport News Shipbuilding and Dry Dock Co., 253 NLRB 721, 731-32 (1980), enf’d sub nom. Peninsula Shipbuilders’ Ass’n v. NLRB, 663 F.2d 488 (4th Cir. 1981).

Hastings v. Earth Satellite Corp.

628 F.2d 85 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 19, 1980

The Board has clearly taken the view that the repeal of section 14(m) should not be applied retroactively. Davis v. George Hyman Constr. Co., 9 B.R.B.S. 127 (1978); Correia v. … . § 905 (b)); Drachenberg v. Canal Barge Co., 571 F.2d 912 (5th Cir. 1978) (same). . See Addison v.

United States v. Holmes

505 F.3d 1288 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 23, 2007

Ornelas v. United States, 517 U.S. 690, 699 (1996); United States v. Brown, 334 F.3d 1161, 1164 (D.C. … See Brown v. Illinois, 422 U.S. 590, 602 (1975); United States v. Wood, 981 F.2d 536, 541 (D.C.