Case law

Burns v. County Election Board

725 P.2d 1264 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 25, 1986

Frank Burns petitions the court to assume original jurisdiction and issue writ of mandamus to the County Election Board of Oklahoma County to place his name on the ballot for the Democratic Primary Election of August 26, … The said Election Board has heretofore on July 17, 1986 stricken his name as candidate in reliance on 19 O.S.1981 § 131(C).

Oklahoma County, Excise Board v. Kurn

189 Okla. 203 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 1, 1941

Ann. § 289; Excise Board of Oklahoma County v. Board of Education of Oklahoma City, 178 Okla. 545 , 61 P. 2d 693 ). … Board of Education of Oklahoma City et al. v. Woodworth et al., 89 Okla. 192 , 214 P. 1077 ; Kirk v. School District No. 24, Greer County, 108 Okla. 81 , 234 P. 596 ; Adams v.

Sears v. Board of Education

271 P.2d 319 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 25, 1954

In American Asbestos Products Co. v. Independent School Dist. … In the opinion of said case it is stated: “A legal and binding contract against a school district can be made only by its board of education in regular session. Board of Education of Town of Carney v.

TAYLOR v. OKLAHOMA WATER RESOURCES BOARD

368 P.3d 436 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Nov 5, 2015

City of Tulsa v. State ex rel. Pub. … See Double LL Contractors, Inc. v.

Board of County Commissioners v. Jones

4 Okla. 341 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 4, 1896

He shall be a member of the territorial board of equalization. … In the case of Clough & Wheat v.

Excise Board v. McClaskey

170 Okla. 512 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 12, 1935

The appellees contend that the rule of law announced by this court in the Downing Case, supra, and in the cases of Bris *513 tow Battery Co. v. Payne, 123 Okla. 137 , 252 P. 423 , Gulf, C. & S. F. Railway Co. v. … Excise Board, 141 Okla. 34 , 283 P. 1003 , and Protest of Bledsoe, 161 Okla. 227 , 17 P. (2d) 979 , to the effect that if an amount is illegally transferred from one fund to another fund, the amount of cash on hand in the

Board of County Commissioners v. Dunlop

17 Okla. 53 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 7, 1906

.: This is an original action in this court, by the board of county commissioners of Kay county against the county treasurer, Robert Dunlop, asking for a writ of mandamus to compel him to deposit a certain percentage of * … 54 the funds in his hands as county treasurer in certain bardes, which had theretofore been designated by, the board as county .depositories, under the provisions of art. 2, chap. 11, of the Session Laws of 1905.

Board of Education v. Schultz

203 Okla. 551 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 14, 1950

Board of Com'rs v. Cockrell

114 Okla. 196 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 9, 1926

Keith, who constitute the board of county commissioners of said county, to compel said board to approve the appointment of G. C. Monroe as field deputy. … The term of office of two members of the old board having expired, they no longer have any interest in the matter, and the new board having approved the appoin'-ment, there is nothing to be determined, and the matter involved

State ex rel. Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v. Brown

303 P.3d 895 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 18, 2013

State of Oklahoma v. Jon Ed Brown, CF-2012-85. … Oklahoma Bar Ass'n v.

Lowden v. Oklahoma County, Excise Board

186 Okla. 706 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 19, 1940

Our attention is directed to Roberts v. Ledgerwood, 134 Okla. 152 , 272 P. 448 , in which are found quotations from the early case of Burks v. … Other helpful citations given us by *708 the parties here are Key v. Donnell, 107 Okla. 157 , 231 P. 546 ; Caddo County v. C., R. I. & P. Ry. Co., 155 Okla. 32 , 7 P. 2d 900 ; Protest of C., R. I. & P. Ry.

Board of County Commissioners v. Price

385 P.2d 479 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 23, 1963

It is also suggested that our holding in the third paragraph of the syllabus in Board of County Commissioners of McIntosh County v. Kirby, 174 Okl. 20 , 49 P.2d 746 , is decisive on the question under consideration. … Whether or not an officer or board has acted arbitrarily, or in abuse of a legal discretion, is to be determined by the facts in the particular case. Green-Boots Const. Co. v.

Jerry v. Pardon and Parole Board

546 P.2d 650 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Feb 12, 1976

United States Board of Parole, 167 U.S.App.D.C. 268 , 511 F.2d 1270 (1974); Cook v. Whiteside, 505 F.2d 32 (5th Cir. 1974); Mower v. Britton, 504 F.2d 396 (10th Cir. 1974); United States ex rel. Johnson v. … Florida Parole and Probation Commission, 289 So.2d 719 (Fla.1974); Monks v. New Jersey State Parole Board, 58 N.J. 238 , 277 A.2d 193 (1971).

Smith v. State Board of Education

190 Okla. 556 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 12, 1942

Searcy v. State ex rel. Carl, 64 Okla. 257 , 167 P. 476 . … It therefore appears that the failure to refer to the issuance or revocation of state certificates by the State Board of Education was not an inadvertence. In the case of Musick v.

Presley v. Board of County Commissioners

70 O.B.A.J. 1669 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 18, 1999

To the extent that Kirk v. Board of County Comm’rs, 1979 OK 80 , 595 P.2d 1334 is in conflict, it is expressly overruled. … Flag-Redfern Oil Co., see note 18, supra; Kirk v. Board of County Comm'rs, 1979 OK 80 , 595 P.2d 1334 , 1336-37. 20 . Norvell v. Illinois, 373 U.S. 420, 423 , 83 S.Ct. 1366, 1368 , 10 L.Ed.2d 456, 459 (1963); Nelson v.

Board of County Commissioners v. Litton

315 P.2d 239 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 4, 1957

These appeals are reported as Litton v. State, 97 Okl.Cr. 367 , 264 P.2d 386 , and Hisel v. … See the discussion in Board of County Com’rs of Okmulgee County v. Ming, 195 Okl. 234 , 156 P.2d 820 , and 14 Am.Jur., “Counties”, sec. 67.

Excise Board v. Board of Ed., City of Tulsa, School Dist. No. 22

180 Okla. 251 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 20, 1937

This is an appeal from an order of the district court of Tulsa county granting a writ of mandamus requiring the excise board of that county to allocate or apportion the limit of ad valorem tax levy under the provisions of … This is a companion case to cause No. 27620, Excise Board of Tulsa County v. City of Tulsa, this day decided, 180 Okla. 248 , 68 P. (2d) 823 ; the cases were argued and submitted together.

Oklahoma Tax Commission v. Brown-Forman Distillers Corp.

420 P.2d 894 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 9, 1966

By amendment to its-petition, plaintiff Brown-Forman limited its: refund action to the fiscal year ending April' 30, 1962. … See International Shoe Co. v. Cocreham, 246 La. 244 , 164 So.2d 314 (1964) certiorari denied.

Board of County Commissioners v. Lowery

136 P.3d 639 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 9, 2006

Brown v. … Brown v. City of Warr Acres, 1997 OK 117, ¶ 18 , 946 P.2d 1140, 1144 .

McWilliams v. Board of County Commissioners

268 P.3d 79 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 20, 2011

Wetsel v. Johnson, 1970 OK 69, 7 , 468 P.2d 479 ; Merritt v. Merritt, 2008 OK 68, 17 , 73 P.3d 878, 882 . … , the boards shall within thirty (30) days of such notice proceed with the division in the manner agreed upon between the respective boards. .