Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersNC

10,000+ results

1.97s

  • Clark v. Brown

    327 N.C. 426 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 29, 1990

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    316 N.C. 380 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 1, 1986

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    313 N.C. 605 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 7, 1985

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Yandle v. Brown

    334 N.C. 626 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 9, 1993

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Cunningham v. Brown

    308 N.C. 675 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 7, 1983

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    298 N.C. 570 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 20, 1979

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brooks v. Brown

    295 N.C. 548 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 29, 1978

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Brown

    294 N.C. 442 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 7, 1978

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Moore

    285 N.C. 756 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 24, 1974

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. Wood

    17 S.C.L. 457 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 15, 1830

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Chappell v. Brown

    17 S.C.L. 528 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 15, 1830

    In the case of Price v. … In the case of Shelton v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. . Carter

    111 N.C. 183 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 5, 1892

    EVANS BROWN v. WILLIAM CARTER. Deed, Construction of — Pleading—Counterclaim. … Brown and Jane Brown his wife, of New Zealand, of the first part, and W. B.

    Cited 0 timesPublishedText from a scan
  • Brown v. Haynes

    59 N.C. 49 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 15, 1860

    Brown took the boy to his plantation, and told me he was to account for him to the firm. … Brown and Michael S. Brown’s estates, one half of this sum belonged to this defendant, and the other half to M. L. Brown.”

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Moore v. . Brown

    51 N.C. 106 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 5, 1858

    We suppose that his Honor was misled by a misapprehension of the principle, decided in Finch v. Ragland, 2 Dev. Eq. 142 , and Whitted v. Webb, 2 Dev. and Bat.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. . Southerland

    145 N.C. 331 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 30, 1907

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Stokes v. . Brown

    42 N.C. 33 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 5, 1850

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Scott v. . Brown

    50 N.C. 406 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1858

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. . Cotter

    196 N.C. 819 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 9, 1929

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Cox v. . Brown

    51 N.C. 100 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 5, 1858

    Rep. 62 ; Sherrod v. Woodard, 4 Dev. Rep. 360 ; Adcock v. Flemming, 2 Dev. and Bat. R. 225; Reynolds v. Magness, 2 Ire. Rep. 26; Lewis v. Bradley, Ibid. 308. … Such a construction, we held ourselves bound to adopt upon a similar aet on the case of Phillips v. Cameron, 3 Jones’ Rep. 390. Here the circumstances are different.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Brown v. . Moseley

    186 N.C. 768 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 10, 1923

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.