Case law

Nyhan v. Retirement Board

39 Mass. App. Ct. 914 · Massachusetts Appeals Court · Sep 26, 1995

On June 12, 1991, Nyhan applied to the Lawrence retirement board (board) for an increase in his retirement benefits under G. … Nyhan appealed from the board’s decision to the Contributory Retirement Appeal Board (CRAB), but that appeal was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See Glorioso v.

Sheridan v. Silver-Brown Co.

4 F. Supp. 759 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Oct 5, 1933

This is a suit for infringement brought against the defendant, Silver-Brown Company, by Francis B. Sheridan and William A. … Gandy v. Main Belting Company, 143 U. S. 587 , 12 S. Ct. 598 , 36 L. Ed. 273 ; Lehnbeuter v. Holthaus, 105 U. S. 94 , 26 L. Ed. 939 .

Sullivan v. Planning Board

38 Mass. App. Ct. 918 · Massachusetts Appeals Court · Feb 1, 1995

Co-stanza & Bertolino, Inc. v. Planning Bd. of N. Reading, 360 Mass. 677, 679 (1971). A planning board’s rejection of a proposed subdivision must be based on particular subdivision regulations, MP Corp. v. … It would not, however, prohibit a planning board’s reasonable regulation of adequate access to a subdivision. See McDavitt v. Planning Bd. of Winchester, 2 Mass. App. Ct. 806, 807 (1974). See also Patel v.

Doe, Sex Offender Registry Board No. 1211 v. Sex Offender Registry Board

447 Mass. 750 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Dec 5, 2006

Roe v. Attorney Gen., 434 Mass. 418 (2001). … As noted in Roe v.

Brown v. Department of Veterans Affairs

451 F. Supp. 2d 273 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Sep 11, 2006

See id. at § 315 (establishing regional offices); Beamon v. Brown, 125 F.3d 965, 967 (6th Cir.1997). … Cleburne Living Ctr., 473 U.S. 432, 442-46 , 105 S.Ct. 3249 , 87 L.Ed.2d 313 (1985)); Brown v.

Doe, Sex Offender Registry Board No. 3839 v. Sex Offender Registry Board

472 Mass. 492 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Aug 21, 2015

No. 8725 v. … Doe No. 68549, 470 Mass. at 110, quoting Goldberg v. Board of Health of Granby, 444 Mass. 627, 638 (2005).

Dennis v. Planning Board

71 Mass. App. Ct. 179 · Massachusetts Appeals Court · Feb 6, 2008

Stoner v. … “Presumably a planning board may not without good reason rescind approval of a definitive plan.” Young v. Planning Bd. of Chilmark, 402 Mass. 841, 846 (1988).

Brown v. Select Theatres Corp.

3 F.R.D. 499 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Mar 15, 1943

Croteau v. Planning Board

40 Mass. App. Ct. 922 · Massachusetts Appeals Court · Apr 19, 1996

See Subaru of New England, Inc. v. Board of Appeals of Canton, 8 Mass. App. Ct. 483 , 488 n.7 (1979). … , arbitrary, whimsical, or capricious, see also Harris v.

Matulewicz v. Planning Board

438 Mass. 37 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Oct 25, 2002

See Rettig v. … Nothing in Dolan v. Board of Appeals of Chatham, 359 Mass. 699, 701 (1971); Horn v. Crest Hill Homes, Inc., 340 Mass. 362, 366 (1960); Reed v. Mayo, 220 Mass. 565, 567 (1915); Carr v.

Kupperstein v. Planning Board

66 Mass. App. Ct. 905 · Massachusetts Appeals Court · Apr 10, 2006

See Kay-Vee Realty Co. v. Town Clerk of Ludlow, 355 Mass. 165 (1969); Lutheran Service Assn. of New England, Inc. v. Metropolitan Dist. Commn., 397 Mass. 341, 344 (1986); Foley v. … Commonwealth, 437 Mass. 1016, 1017 (2002); Zaltman v. Town Clerk of Stoneham, 5 Mass. App. Ct. 248, 251 (1977); J & R Inv., Inc. v. City Clerk of New Bedford, 28 Mass. App. Ct. 1, 6-8 (1989). Compare Craig v.

Ball v. Planning Board

58 Mass. App. Ct. 513 · Massachusetts Appeals Court · Jul 9, 2003

The board also contends that there exists a contradiction between Sturdy v. Planning Bd. of Hingham, 32 Mass. App. … See, e.g., Gifford v. Planning Bd. of Nantucket, 376 Mass. 801, 807 (1978); Perry v. Planning Bd. of Nantucket, 15 Mass. App. Ct. 144, 150 (1983); Hutchinson v. Planning Bd. of Hingham, 23 Mass. App.

Terrill v. Planning Board

71 Mass. App. Ct. 171 · Massachusetts Appeals Court · Feb 6, 2008

Bank v. Dawes, 369 Mass. 550, 553-554 (1976). … See Stoner v. Planning Bd. of Agawam, 358 Mass. 709, 714 (1971). The board belatedly wrote to the bank on February 19, 2004, requesting its consent so the board could proceed with the rescission.

Bucci v. Planning Board

4 Mass. App. Ct. 775 · Massachusetts Appeals Court · Feb 10, 1976

L. c. 41, § 81BB” praying “[t]hat the approval of the Planning Board in granting the subdivision to Respondent Batter be annulled,” the defendant planning board, with the consent of John F. Batter, Jr., and Rosemary A. … See Marino v. Board of Appeal of Beverly, 2 Mass. App. Ct. 859, 860 (1974). See also Stoner v. Planning Bd. of Agawam, 358 Mass. 709, 710 (1971); Bigham v. Planning Bd. of No. Reading, 362 Mass. 860 (1972).

Carson v. Board of Appeals

321 Mass. 649 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Oct 6, 1947

Lambert v. Board of Appeals of Lowell, 295 Mass. 224, 225, 227 . Building Commissioner of Medford v. C. & H. Co. 319 Mass. 273, 281 . Smith v. Board of Appeals of Fall River, 319 Mass. 341, 343, 344 . … Marinelli v. Board of Appeal of Boston, 275 Mass. 169, 173 . Pitman v. Medford, 312 Mass. 618, 623, 624 .

Doe, Sex Offender Registry Board No. 3974 v. Sex Offender Registry Board

457 Mass. 53 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Jun 4, 2010

The “nature of the case” assigned to the board is distinguishable from the elements of a prima facie case before the board. See Sperounes v. … No. 3844 v.

Lynch v. Planning Board

4 Mass. App. Ct. 781 · Massachusetts Appeals Court · Feb 17, 1976

Ct. 747, 748 [1975]), and the board’s determination thereafter that the plan did require such approval was without legal effect (Cassani v. Planning Bd. of Hull, 1 Mass. App. Ct. 451, 453-458 [1973]). … Nor need we consider the board’s claim, based on Pieper v.

Kelley v. Planning Board

6 Mass. App. Ct. 24 · Massachusetts Appeals Court · Jan 30, 1978

Cas-sani v. Planning Board of Hull, 1 Mass. App. Ct. 451, 456-457 (1973). … Planning Board of Hull, 1 Mass. App. Ct. at 456-457 ; Devine v. Town Clerk of Plymouth, 3 Mass. App. Ct. 747 (1975).

Brackett v. Board of Appeal

311 Mass. 52 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Feb 25, 1942

Prusik v. Board of Appeal of Boston, 262 Mass. 451, 457-458 . … See Norcross v. Board of Appeal of Boston, 255 Mass. 177, 185 ; Prusik v. Board of Appeal of Boston, 262 Mass. 451, 457 ; Coleman v. Board of Appeal of Boston, 281 Mass. 112,116-117 ; Phillips v.

Driscoll v. Board of Trustees

70 Mass. App. Ct. 285 · Massachusetts Appeals Court · Sep 27, 2007

The school admits boys and girls in kindergarten through grade twelve and offers boarding for students in the upper school (grades nine through twelve). The upper school has approximately 680 students. … The complaint alleges, however, that “[sjtudents in grades 9 through 12 — over and under 16 years old, day students and boarding students — freely and regularly had sex ... on campus.”