Case law

Brown v. District of Columbia

822 F. Supp. 17 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 28, 1993

After deliberation, the Adjustment Board found Brown guilty of all five charges. Brown was required to serve 14 days in administrative segregation or detention as a result of the findings of the Board. … presented at the hearing; and second, because the Board failed to provide Brown with an adequate written statement setting forth the evidence relied upon in reaching its decision.

Brown v. Obama

352 F. App'x 446 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 28, 2009

See Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C.Cir.2004). That rule requires “a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 8(a). … Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544 , 556 n. 3, 127 S.Ct. 1955 , 167 L.Ed.2d 929 (2007) (citation omitted).

Brown v. Obama

352 F. App'x 446 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 28, 2009

See Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C.Cir.2004). That rule requires “a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 8(a). … Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544 , 556 n. 3, 127 S.Ct. 1955 , 167 L.Ed.2d 929 (2007) (citation omitted).

Brown v. Miller

360 F. App'x 164 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 5, 2010

See Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C.Cir.2004). That rule requires “a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 8(a). … Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544 , 556 n. 3, 127 S.Ct. 1955 , 167 L.Ed.2d 929 (2007) (citation omitted).

Brown v. Miller

360 F. App'x 164 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 5, 2010

See Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C.Cir.2004). That rule requires “a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 8(a). … Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544 , 556 n. 3, 127 S.Ct. 1955 , 167 L.Ed.2d 929 (2007) (citation omitted).

Brown v. Chevy Chase Bank

District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 7, 2009

T U T m mR l C JEROME JULIUS BROWN … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497,498 (D.D.C. 1977). Plaintiffs complaint fails to accomplish the basic purpose of Rule 8(a).

Brown v. U.S. Parole Commission

District Court, District of Columbia · May 21, 2010

The former District of Columbia Board of Parole (“Parole Board”) released petitioner on parole on March 9, 1998. USPC Opp’n, Ex. 3 (Certificate of Parole). … Petitioner apparently committed an armed robbery, which prompted the Parole Board to revoke his parole and to grant reparole immediately. Id., Ex. 4 (Notice of Board Order dated October 28, 1998).

Brown v. Metro Transit Police Department

87 F. Supp. 3d 145 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 1, 2015

P. 56(a); see Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242, 247 (1986); Estate of Parsons v. Palestinian Auth., 651 F.3d 118, 123 (D.C. Cir. 2011); Tao v. … See Myers v.

United States v. Sanford Ltd.

841 F. Supp. 2d 309 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 30, 2012

SI Count V at ¶ 2. … See United States v.

Brown v. Baradel, Kosmerl & Nolan

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 28, 2009

District and JEROME JULIUS BROWN, SR., Bankruptcy Courts Plaintiff, v. … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 CD.D.C. 1977). Plaintiffs complaint fails to accomplish the basic purpose of Rule 8(a).

Calloway v. Parole Board

District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 4, 2010

Calloway, Petitioner, v. Civil Action No. 10-0279 (JDB) Parole Board, Respondent.

Trump Plaza Associates v. National Labor Relations Board

679 F.3d 822 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 11, 2012

The High Court ultimately held that the two-member Board lacked the authority to act, New Process Steel, L.P. v. NLRB, 130 S. … Co. v. NLRB, 140 F.3d 259, 265 (D.C.

Brown v. District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 16, 2021

Brown v. District of Columbia, 322 F.R.D. 51, 96 (D.D.C. 2017). She therefore entered judgment for the District of Columbia. See id. Plaintiffs appealed and the court of appeals reversed. … Brown v. District of Columbia, 928 F.3d 1070, 1079 (D.C. Cir. 2019). The court of appeals therefore remanded for a new trial. See id. at 1083-85 (laying out remand instructions).

Brown v. Suburban Propane, Lp

District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 26, 2009

District and FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Bankruptcy Courts JEROME JULIDS BROWN, SR., Plaintiff, v. … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). Plaintiffs complaint fails to accomplish the basic purpose of Rule 8(a).

Ocean National Bank v. Brown

10 D.C. 75 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 1, 1881

Crittenden, for Volens, cited 3 Leading Cases in Equity, 646-7; State Bank v. Tweedy, 8 Blackf., 447 ; Stanley v. Beatty, 4 Ind., 184 ; U. S. Bank v. Covert, 13 Ohio, 240. … Morgan, and Edwards & Barnard, for Mattingly, cited Noyes v. Clark, 7 Paige, 179 ; Crane v. Ward, Clarke Ch. R., (N. Y.,) 400; Donley v. McKean, 17 Serg. & Rawle, 400 ; Hancock’s Appeal, 34 Penn.

State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Brown

593 A.2d 184 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 19, 1991

Enid Brown was the car’s owner. 3 . … See, e.g., Starling v. Jephunneh Lawrence & Assocs., 495 A.2d 1157 (D.C.1985). 8 .

Brown v. 1401 New York Avenue, Inc.

25 A.3d 912 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 4, 2011

Beckman v. … Co. v.

Brown v. Howard University Hospital

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 29, 2021

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA SHARONDA BROWN, Plaintiff, v. … Adams v. George W.

['Brown v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.']

25 F. Supp. 3d 144 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 18, 2014

Class In order to show that Brown’s claims are precluded by the In re Wachovia Corp. class settlement, Wells Fargo must first show that Brown was a member of that class. See Cooper v. … Pigford v. Veneman, 355 F. Supp. 2d 148, 162 (D.D.C. 2005) (alteration in original) (quoting Reppert v. Marvin Lumber & Cedar Co., Inc., 359 F.3d 53, 56-57 (1st Cir. 2004); see also Hallman v. Pa. Life Ins.

Brown v. Potomac Electric Power Company

236 F. Supp. 815 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 15, 1964

App.D.C. 68, 69-70, 183 F.2d 822, 823 (1950); Washington Loan & Trust Co. v. Hickey, supra note 6 , 78 U.S.App. D.C. at 61, 137 F.2d at 679 ; Brown v. … Jones, 133 Ala. 217 , 32 So. 500 (1902); Brown v. Edison Electric Illuminating Co., 90 Md. 400 , 45 Atl. 182 , 78 Am.St.Rep. 442 , 46 L.R.A. 745 (1900); City of Marlow v.