Case law

National Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, City of Albuquerque and the Albuquerque Chamber of Commerce, Titusville-Cocoa Airport Authority, Huntsville-Madison Airport Authority, United Air Lines, Inc., Continental Airlines, Inc., Intervenors. Delta Air Lines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Continental Airlines, Inc., United Air Lines, Inc., Intervenors

392 F.2d 504 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 29, 1968

v. … Civil Aeronautics Board, 97 U.S.App.D.C. 46 , 50, 228 F.2d 17, 21 (1955) 20 Delta Air Lines v.

Byrd v. Allstate Insurance Co.

622 A.2d 691 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 2, 1993

Brown v. General Motors Acceptance Corp., 490 A.2d 1125, 1126 (D.C.1985); Holland, supra, 456 A.2d at 815 . … Co. v.

Hunt v. United States Department of Agriculture

740 F. Supp. 2d 41 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 23, 2010

.”); Harrison v. … See LeBlanc v.

Citizens for Responsibility & Ethics in Washington v. United States Department of Justice

846 F.3d 1235 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 31, 2017

True, as the Supreme Court explained in Renegotiation Board v. … Brown v. Plata, 563 U.S. 493, 538 (2011) (citations and internal quotation marks omitted).

Sohm v. Dillon

235 F. Supp. 450 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 12, 1964

Finally, the Supreme Court has stated in Orloff v. … No decision of that Board has yet been made. Further proceedings before that Board await plaintiff’s designation of a date for reopening the hearing. Under Ogden v.

Watergate East Committee Against Hotel Conversion to Co-Op Apartments v. District of Columbia Zoning Commission

953 A.2d 1036 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 24, 2008

Brown v. District of Columbia Bd. of Zoning Adjustment, 486 A.2d 37, 52 (D.C.1984) (en banc) (quotation omitted). … Brown v. District of Columbia Bd. of Zoning Adjustment, 486 A.2d 37, 52 (D.C.1984) (en banc) (quotation omitted). 10 .

Takeda Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. v. Dudas

511 F. Supp. 2d 81 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 18, 2007

Mosler Safe & Lock Company v. Mosler Bahmann & Company Takeda also contends the Board’s reliance on Mosler Safe & Lock Company v. … See, e.g., Providence Rubber Co. v.

Frank D. Crum v. General Adjustment Bureau and Home Indemnity Company, General Adjustment Bureau and Home Indemnity Company v. Frank D. Crum

738 F.2d 474 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 6, 1984

(“BRB” or “Board”). … But the BRB was not entitled to review this matter de novo; rather, the Board was bound by the AU’s determination if supported by substantial evidence. See Bath Iron Works Corp. v.

Jennings v. Gilbertson

74 A.2d 839 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 28, 1950

Hutchinson v. Peacock, D.C.Mun.App. 73 A.2d 903 . 3 . Lichter v. U. S„ 334 Ü.S. 742, 791, 68 S. Ct. 1294 , 92 L.Ed. 1694 ; see also Chambers v. Robertson, U.S.App.D.C., 183 F.2d 144 , decided June 12, 1950. 4 . … Seaboard & Western Airlines v. Civil Aeronautics Board, U.S.App.D.C., - F.2d — decided June 5, 1950. 5 . Citing 52 Stat. 1024 , 49 U.S.C.A. § 646 (e). 6 . Code 1940, Supp. VII, 45—1609(b). 7 . Taylor v.

Horry County v. United States

449 F. Supp. 990 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 4, 1978

Allen v. State Board of Elections, supra; United States v. Board of Comm’rs of Sheffield, supra; Perkins v. Matthews, supra; City of Richmond v. United States, supra. 5. … Perkins v. Matthews, supra; Allen v. State Board of Elections, supra. 7.

Jeffry Schmidt v. United States

749 F.3d 1064 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 25, 2014

See Schmidt v. United States, 89 Fed. Cl. 111 (Ct. … Larsen v. U.S. Navy, 525 F.3d 1, 3– 4 (D.C. Cir. 2008) (quoting Cnty. of Los Angeles v. Davis, 440 U.S. 625, 631 (1979)).

Greater Southeast Community Hospital v. Heckler

602 F. Supp. 764 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 15, 1985

See Villa View Community Hospital, Inc. v. Heckler, 728 F.2d 539, 541-42 (D.C.Cir.1984); Psychiatric Institute of Washington, D.C., Inc. v. Schweiker, 669 F.2d 812, 814 (D.C.Cir.1981). … See Psychiatric Institute of Washington, D.C., Inc. v. Schweiker, 669 F.2d 812 (D.C.Cir.1981). 2 .

Keyworth C. Birch, Jr. v. Sam A. Anderson

358 F.2d 520 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 9, 1965

But we find support in the dicta of the Eighth Circuit in Sprouse v. Settle, 274 F.2d 681 . Since Taylor v. Godwin, supra, relies primarily upon Schiffman v. … We commented upon this problem in Mock v. U. S. Board of Parole, 120 U.S.App.D.C. 248 , 345 F.2d 737 . 4 . Att’y Gen. Survey of Release Procedures 29-31 (1939) herein cited as Survey. 5 . Survey, 493. 6 . H.R.Rep.

In re L.J.

546 A.2d 429 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 18, 1988

We have stressed before that crime prevention is “a weighty social objective,” Brown v. … See Brown v. United States, 119 U.S.App.D.C. 203, 207 , 338 F.2d 543, 547 (1964); Smith v. United States, 392 A.2d 990, 993 (D.C.1978).

Federal Election Commission v. Committee to Elect Lyndon La Rouche

613 F.2d 849 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 19, 1980

Jones v. … In FTC v.

Brotherhood of Railway & Steamship Clerks, Freight Handlers, Express & Station Employees v. United Transport Service Employees of America

137 F.2d 817 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 2, 1943

From said judgment the Board perfected no appeal, and the intervening Brotherhood is the sole appellant. In Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. … Trainmen v.

Carter v. PANAMA CANAL COMPANY

314 F. Supp. 386 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 20, 1970

In Abbott v. … In Anderson v.

Germonprez v. Director of Selective Service

318 F. Supp. 829 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 8, 1970

Gregory et al., plaintiffs, v. Lewis B. Hershey et al., defendants, Civil Action No. 33057. The *830 defendant Lewis B. Hershey was the then Director of Selective Service. … The judgment was preceded by an opinion (Exhibit A to verified complaint) reported in Gregory v.

Mansfield v. Billington

432 F. Supp. 2d 64 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 1, 2006

Macharia v. United States, 334 F.3d 61, 64, 67 (D.C.Cir.2003); Holy Land Found, for Relief & Dev. v. Ashcroft, 333 F.3d 156, 165 (D.C.Cir.2003); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242 . … Stella v. Mineta, 284 F.3d 135, 145 (D.C.Cir.2002) (quoting Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 452 (D.C.Cir.1999)); see also McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792, 802 , 93 S.Ct. 1817 , 36 L.Ed.2d 668 (1973).

Fairfax Village Condominium VIII Unit Owners' Ass'n v. Fairfax Village Community Ass'n

726 A.2d 675 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 11, 1999

Sacks v. Rothberg, 569 A.2d 150, 154 (D.C.1990). If the contract provision is ambiguous ... our review is limited. In such a case, the trial court will essentially have been acting as a finder of fact, Dodek v. … Ass’n v. Lee, 345 A.2d 456, 462 (D.C.1975).