Case law

Budik v. Ashley

36 F. Supp. 3d 132 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 14, 2014

Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678 (2009) (quoting Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544, 570 (2007)). … Cir. 1997) (“As res judicata belongs to courts as well as to litigants, even a 4 The plaintiff also asserts that the Army Review Board, presumably the Army Board for the Correction of Military Records (“Army Board”), Def

Luff v. Ryan

128 F. Supp. 105 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 12, 1955

Chicago & Southern Air Lines v. Waterman Corp., 1948, 333 U.S. 103, 112-113 , 68 S.Ct. 431, 437 , 92 L.Ed. 568 . … Aircraft & Diesel Equipment Corp. v. Hirsch, 1947, 331 U.S. 752, 773-774 , 67 S.Ct. 1493, 1504 , 91 L.Ed. 1796 .

Ong v. United States of America

District Court, District of Columbia · May 15, 2026

Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). … v.

Fontaine v. Bank of America, N.A.

43 F. Supp. 3d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 16, 2014

v. … DATE: May 16, 2014 Ketanji Brown Jackson KETANJI BROWN JACKSON

Tucson Medical Center v. Heckler

611 F. Supp. 823 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 19, 1985

Compare Lopez v. … No. 84-2496; Georgetown University Hospital v. Heckler, C.A. No. 84-3484; Capitol Hill Hospital v. Heckler, C.A. No. 85-0729; Washington Hospital Center v. Heckler, C.A.

Krzywicki v. Harker

District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 29, 2024

Fuentes v. Shevin, 407 U.S. 67, 80 (1972). … See, e.g., Chiayu Chang v. USCIS, 254 F.

Universal Health Services of McAllen, Inc. v. Sullivan

770 F. Supp. 704 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 21, 1991

In Heckler v. … In Webster v.

In re Tsai

860 A.2d 335 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 21, 2004

In this disciplinary proceeding, the Board on Professional Responsibility (“the Board”) has recommended that reciprocal and functionally identical discipline be imposed in the form of a public censure. … Attorney Grievance Comm’n v. Tsai, 376 Md. 538 , 830 A.2d 910 (2003). 1 Respondent did not notify Bar Counsel of this Maryland order, as our rules require. See D.C. Bar Rule XI, § 11(b).

Smallwood v. United States Department of Justice

266 F. Supp. 3d 217 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 19, 2017

Three Forks Ranch Corn. v. Bureau of Land Mgmt., 358 F. Supp. 2d 1, 2 (D.D.C. 2005). For example, in Brown v. EPA, 384 F. … Brown,’ and that ‘Ms. Brown has hired me to obtain certain documentation pursuant to FOIA.”’).

Rizzi v. Fanelli

63 A.2d 872 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 4, 1949

Dick v. Marx and Rawolle, Inc., 55 App.D.C. 267 , 4 F.2d 879 ; Board of Trustees, etc., v. O. D. Wilson Co., 77 U.S.App.D.C. 127 , 133 F.2d 399 ; Portland Hotel Corporation v. Fidelity Storage Corporation, 77 U.S.App. … See also Whiting v. Davidge, 23 App.D.C. 156 , and Stanton v. Haskins, 8 D.C. 558 , 1 MacArthur 558 , 29 Am.Rep. 612 . Neary v. Markham, 10 Cir., 155 E.2d 485; Ridge v. Healy, 8 Cir., 251 E. 798; Skeen v.

Laccetti v. SEC. & Exch. Comm'n

885 F.3d 724 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 23, 2018

LACCETTI, PETITIONER v. … Conley, Solicitor, and Dominick V. Freda, Assistant General Counsel, Securities and Exchange Commission.

Spine v. BIEDERMANN MOTECH GMBH

684 F. Supp. 2d 68 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 16, 2010

See KSR Int’l Co. v. … In Shreve v.

Brotherhood of Railroad Signalmen v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation

District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 2, 2023

Mkts. & Co. v. Hans, 985 F. Supp. 2d 33, 36 (D.D.C. 2013) (citing Stolt-Nielsen S.A. v. AnimalFeeds Int’l Corp., 559 U.S. 662, 671 (2010)). … Grace & Co v. Loc. Union 759, 461 U.S. 757, 764–65 (1983) (cleaned up); see also Am. Postal Workers Union, AFL-CIO v. U.S. Postal Serv., 789 F.2d 1, 8 (D.C.

Arneja v. Gildar

541 A.2d 621 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 11, 1988

Spellman v. American Security Bank, N.A., 504 A.2d 1119, 1122 (D.C.1986); Brown v. General Motors Acceptance Corp., 490 A.2d 1125, 1126 (D.C.1985). … Id; see Brown v. Collins, 131 U.S.App.D.C. 68 , 71, 402 F.2d 209, 212 (1968).

Robb v. Vilsack

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 4, 2025

Mont- gomery v. Mayorkas, Nos. 23-cv-3931, 24-cv-1697, 2024 WL 4973406, at *5 (D.D.C. Dec. 4, 2024) (quoting Stella v. Mineta, 284 F.3d 135, 143 (D.C. Cir. 2002)); see also, e.g. Brown v. … See, e.g., Brown v. District of Columbia, No. 17-cv-348, 2019 WL 3423208, at *7 (D.D.C.

United States v. Gillette Co.

828 F. Supp. 78 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 5, 1993

Therefore, this case is distinguishable from Brown Shoe and the other cases cited by defendants. … Defendant cites the following cases for this preclusion: Brown Shoe Co. v. United States, 370 U.S. 294, 326 , 82 S.Ct. 1502, 1524 , 8 L.Ed.2d 510 (1962); Liggett & Myers, Inc. v.

Gilbert Ortiz, Jr. Nollie Plowman v. Secretary of Defense Secretary of the Army

41 F.3d 738 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 7, 1994

Ortiz v. … Muse v.

Local Union 676, Affiliated With the Laborers' International Union of North America, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, M. F. A. Milling Company, Intervenor. National Labor Relations Board v. M. F. A. Milling Company, Local Union 676, Affiliated With the Laborers' International Union of North America, Afl-Cio, Intervenor. M. F. A. Milling Company v. National Labor Relations Board

463 F.2d 953 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 9, 1972

P 12,665 LOCAL UNION 676, Affiliated with the Laborers' International Union of North America, AFL-CIO, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent, M. F. A. Milling Company, Intervenor. … NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Petitioner, v. M. F. A. MILLING COMPANY, Respondent, Local Union 676, Affiliated with the Laborers' International Union of North America, AFL-CIO, Intervenor. M. F. A.

National Labor Relations Board v. Blevins Popcorn Co.

744 F.2d 878 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 19, 1984

National Labor Relations Board, Petitioner v. Blevins Popcorn Co., Respondent No. 75-1748. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. Sept. 19, 1984. Before WRIGHT, TAMM and LEVENTHAL, Circuit Judges. … order issued June 19, 1975, and by refusing and continuing to refuse, despite requests of Board agents, to sign and post copies of the Board's notice in accordance with the provisions of the Board's order. 4 By its conduct

District of Columbia v. Mattingly

28 App. D.C. 176 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 19, 1906

In the case of Ferguson v. Fallons, 2 Phila. 168 , the facts were almost identical with the facts in this case. … In the case of Hoffstot v.