Case law

Adair v. Winter

451 F. Supp. 2d 202 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 11, 2006

On October 29, 2002, the plaintiffs filed their motion to compel the testimony of Navy Chaplain promotion selection boards and SER boards. Chaplaincy of Full Gospel Churches v. … Mistretta v.

Cargill, Inc. v. Commodity Exchange Commission

103 F. Supp. 992 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 8, 1952

As pointed out in Rice v. … of Trade referred to in Note 3, at pages 252 and 253 of 331 U.S. and page 1163 of 67 S.Ct., in Rice v.

Troutbrook Company LLC v. NLRB

107 F.4th 994 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 12, 2024

Ass’n v. NLRB, 967 F.3d 878, 893 (D.C. … Bonanno Linen Serv., Inc. v.

Capital Transit Co. v. United States

97 F. Supp. 614 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 23, 1951

Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board, 71 S.Ct. 456, 465 . … Utiiversal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations Board, supra.

Helvering v. Gulf, M. & N. R. Co.

71 F.2d 953 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 14, 1934

Co. v. Com’r, 16 B. T. A. 665, affirmed (8th C. C. A.) 53 P.(2d) 372; Midland Valley Railroad Co. v. Com’r, 19 B. T. A. 42-3, affirmed (10th C. C. A.) 57 F.(2d) 1042 ; Helvering v. St. Louis S. W. Ry. Co. (C. C. … Brewster v. Gage, 280 U. S. 327, 337 , 50 S. Ct. 115 ', 74 L. Ed. 457 . The Circuit Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit upheld the regulations in question in Lehigh & Hudson River Ry. Co. v.

Peoples Bank v. Eccles

64 F. Supp. 811 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 14, 1946

In Maryland Casualty Co. v. … Edelmann & Co. v.

Broyhill & Associates, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

911 F.2d 819 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 27, 1990

BROYHILL & ASSOCIATES, INC., Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. No. 89-1701. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. Aug. 27, 1990. … See Teamsters Local 175 v. NLRB, 788 F.2d 27 , 30 (D.C.Cir.1986). It is 3 FURTHER ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the cross-application for enforcement be granted.

Gilbert v. Wilson

292 F. Supp. 3d 426 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 27, 2018

Cir. 1997) (Air Force selective early retirement board); Paylor v. Winter , 600 F.Supp.2d 117 (D.D.C. 2009) (Navy promotion selection board); Ricks , 65 Fed.Cl. 826 (Air Force promotion selection board); Christensen v. … v.

Matter of Shorter

570 A.2d 760 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 21, 1990

V 1987). 1 On January 10, 1986, finding that respondent had been convicted of a serious crime within the meaning of Bar Rule XI, § 15(1), (4) 2 law, we accordingly referred the matter to the Board on Professional Responsibility … United States v. Carrollo, 30 F.Supp. 3, 6 (W.D.Mo.1939).

Major Adolph H. Knehans, Jr. v. Clifford L. Alexander, Secretary of the Army

566 F.2d 312 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 3, 1977

See, e. g., Horn v. Schlesinger, 514 F.2d 549, 551 (8th Cir. 1975); Sohm v. Fowler, 124 U.S.App.D.C. 382 , 365 F.2d 915 (1966); McCurdy v. … See, e. g., Hodges v.

Association of Retail Travel Agents, Ltd. v. Air Transport Ass'n of America

635 F. Supp. 534 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 9, 1986

(ARTA) brings this action against the Air Transport Association of America (ATA), its member carriers, and members of the ATA board of directors. … Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc., 429 U.S. 477, 488 , 97 S.Ct. 690, 697 , 50 L.Ed.2d 701 (1977) (quoting Brown Shoe Co. v. United States, 370 U.S. 294, 320 , 82 S.Ct. 1502, 1521 , 8 L.Ed.2d 510 (1962)) (emphasis in original).

Smith v. Moore

749 A.2d 132 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 20, 2000

Florida v. … See Tyler v. United States, 705 A.2d 270, 273 (D.C.1997) (en banc); Teachey v. Carver, 736 A.2d 998, 1002-03 (D.C.1999); Abdullah v. Roach, 668 A.2d 801, 804-05 (D.C.1995). .

Thomas McLamb v. NLRB

141 F.4th 1308 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 1, 2025

Standard of Review “Judicial review of the Board’s decisions and orders must evaluate both the Board’s statements of law and application of law to the facts.” Circus Circus Casinos v. NLRB, 961 F.3d 469, 475 (D.C. … Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRB, 340 U.S. 474, 477 (1951) (quotation omitted). We give “substantial deference to inferences drawn by the Board from the factual record.” Tenneco Auto., Inc. v.

1230-1250 Twenty-Third Street Condominium Unit Owners Ass'n v. Bolandz

978 A.2d 1188 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 27, 2009

(quoting Maybin v. … Bolandz explained to the trial court that this law firm was involved in pursuing a claim against a Board member (which was not part of Count II), and withdrew those fees from his fee request. . In Chang v.

In re Johnson

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 23, 2025

Board on Professional Responsibility alleging their eligibility and fitness to be reinstated. Id. § 16(d); Board Pro. Resp. R. 9.1(c). … XI, § 16(e); Board Pro. Resp. R. 9.6(a).

In Re Mizel

703 A.2d 1249 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 30, 1997

We are persuaded by the Board’s reasoning, and therefore, we adopt the Board’s uncontested recommendation for sanction. … opposing counsel in Scott v.

Prunte v. Universal Music Group

484 F. Supp. 2d 32 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 30, 2007

Summit Health, Ltd. v. Pinhas, 500 U.S. 322, 325 , 111 S.Ct. 1842 , 114 L.Ed.2d 366 (1991); Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C.Cir.2002). … Brown Univ., 248 F.Supp.2d at 77 n. 10.

Mitchner v. United States

531 A.2d 666 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 30, 1987

A defendant’s sentence and parole are determined by the jurisdiction whose laws are violated even though the situs of incarceration determines which board of parole has supervisory jurisdiction. Chatman-Bey v. … Mitchner does not challenge any failure of this Board to use its authority differently from the District of Columbia Board of Parole. .

Farouki v. Petra International Banking Corp.

811 F. Supp. 2d 388 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 20, 2011

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C.Cir.2002). … Smith v. Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp., 3 F.Supp.2d 1473, 1475 (D.D.C.1998) (citing Kuwait Airways Corp. v. Am. Sec. Bank, N.A., 890 F.2d 456 , 463 n. 11 (D.C.Cir.1989)).

Fanning v. C & L Service Corporation

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 13, 2013

the International ) Union of Operating Engineers and ) Participating Employers, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. … Date: September 13, 2013 Ketanji Brown Jackson KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District Judge