Case law

Kaul v. Federation of State Medical Boards

District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 1, 2020

State Board of Dental Examiners v. … Brown, 317 U.S. 341 (1943), established that state and municipal authorities are immune from federal antitrust lawsuits for actions taken pursuant to a clearly expressed state policy that, when legislated, had foreseeable

American Mail Line, Ltd. v. James W. Gulick

411 F.2d 696 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 17, 1969

Cuneo v. McNamara, Civ.Action No. 1826-67 (D.D.C.1967); Kovic v. Gardner, Civ.Action No. 2008-67 (D.D.C. 1967); Bandy v. … See generally Pacific Far East Line, Inc. v. United States, 394 F.2d 990 , 184 Ct.Cl. 169 (1968); Lykes Bros. Steamship Co. v. United States, Ct.Cl. No. 399-67 (1968); Weiss v.

U.S. International Trade Commission v. ASAT, Inc.

411 F.3d 245 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 10, 2005

However, because it is not so clear that Steel Co. is inconsistent with the characterization of similar statutory language in LaRouche and FTC v. Browning, 435 F.2d 96 (D.C. … Browning, 435 F.2d at 100.

Palmieri v. United States of America

72 F. Supp. 3d 191 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 3, 2014

See, e.g., T.M. v. District of Columbia, 961 F. Supp. 2d 169, 173–74 (D.D.C. 2013); Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977). … Brown, 913 F.2d 1399, 1404 (9th Cir. 1990) ("[A] claim for denial of due process stemming from the revocation of a security clearance is not a colorable constitutional claim."); accord El-Ganayni v. U.S.

Perkins v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

482 A.2d 401 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 9, 1984

D.C.Code § 1-1509 (e) (1981); Hawkins v. District Unemployment Compensation Board, supra; General Railway Signal Co. v. District Unemployment Compensation Board, 354 A.2d 529, 532 (D.C.1976). … Compare Carpenter v. District of Columbia Unemployment Compensation Board, 409 A.2d 175 (D.C.1979); Thomas v. District of Columbia Department of Labor, supra. 4 .

International Organization of Masters, Mates & Pilots, ILA, AFL-CIO v. NLRB

61 F.4th 169 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 3, 2023

Furthermore, “judicial deference is not warranted where the Board fails to adequately explain its reasoning, or where the Board leaves critical gaps in its reasoning.” David Saxe Prods., LLC v. … Encino Motorcars, LLC v. Navarro, 579 U.S. 211, 221 (2016); see NLRB v. CNN Am., Inc., 865 F.3d 740, 748 (D.C.

In Re Wright

702 A.2d 1251 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 13, 1997

DePass in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, styled Derrick Anthony DePass v. United States, C.A. … Respondent was served with a copy of the Board’s order. However, Respondent has never responded to the Board’s order.

Aug v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.

425 F. Supp. 946 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 30, 1976

See, NLRB v. Sears, Roebuck & Co., 421 U.S. 132 , 95 S.Ct. 1504 , 44 L.Ed.2d 29 (1975); Renegotiation Board v. … Board, and contained in Board minutes.

US Inventor, Inc. v. United States Patent and Trademark Office

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 12, 2023

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. … Arpaio v. Obama, 797 F.3d 11, 19 (D.C. Cir. 2015) (quoting Lujan v. Defs. of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555, 560 (1992)).

Pinkney v. District of Columbia

439 F. Supp. 519 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 18, 1977

Healy City Board of Education v. Doyle, 429 U.S. 274, 284-286 , 97 S.Ct. 568, 574-575 , 50 L.Ed.2d 471, 482-83 (1977). … Moore v. City of East Cleveland, 431 U.S. 494, 544-551 , 97 S.Ct. 1932 , 1959 1961, 52 L.Ed. 531 , 565-568 (1977). 24 . Id. 25 . See Cleveland Board of Education v.

In Re Chasnoff

827 A.2d 808 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 12, 2003

Attorney Grievance Comm’n of Md. v. Chasnoff, 366 Md. 250 , 783 A.2d 224 (2001). … XI, § 11(d), 1 and referred the matter to the Board on Professional Responsibility (“Board”). The Board recommends that we impose reciprocal discipline in the form of a ninety-day suspension with a fitness requirement.

NMI Systems, Inc. v. Pillard (In Re NMI Systems, Inc.)

179 B.R. 357 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 29, 1995

Brown-stein, a member of the board of directors. Brownstein wrote to Dramis on May 6,1991, raising questions about the bonus plan and stock options included in the offer letter. … See also Herm v.

Jumawid v. Rose

127 F.R.D. 641 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 27, 1989

Brown that the Plaintiff was refusing to disclose. … See National Hockey League v. Metropolitan Hockey Club, 427 U.S. 639 , 96 S.Ct. 2778 , 49 L.Ed.2d 747 (1976).

United States v. Tracey A. Hall

969 F.2d 1102 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 10, 1992

See, e.g., United States v. … United States v.

In Re Lee

706 A.2d 1032 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 5, 1998

United States v. Lee, 485 F.2d 41 (4th Cir.1973). He was sentenced to two years of incarceration. On March 19, 1990, Petitioner filed a Petition for Reinstatement with this Board. … Bar Counsel’s Position Bar Counsel opposed the Petition for Reinstatement, and urged that the Board adopt *1035 the Hearing Committee’s recommendation that it be denied. V.

Colo. Fire Sprinkler, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

891 F.3d 1031 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 8, 2018

See, e.g., NLRB v. … See NLRB v.

Americans for Clean Energy v. Environmental Protection Agency

864 F.3d 691 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 28, 2017

Before: BROWN, KAVANAUGH, and MILLETT, Circuit Judges. Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge KAVANAUGH. … In Part V, we consider and reject National Biodiesel Board’s contention that EPA violated its statutory authority when interpreting and applying the cellulosic waiver provision.

Matter of Thorup

432 A.2d 1221 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 7, 1981

[Internal Rules of Board on Professional Responsibility chapter 8, No. 5.] The courts have generally held that the burden of proof in attorney disciplinary proceedings is on the proponent. Charlton v. … Thornton v. United States, D.C.App., 357 A.2d 429, 436 (1976); Angarano v. United States, D.C.App., 312 A.2d 295, 299 (1973).

Herminio Armando Sanchez v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

707 F.2d 1523 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 17, 1983

See INS v. … ); Chae Kim Ro v.

Walsh v. Rundlette

9 D.C. 114 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 15, 1875

Sugd., V. & P., from 107 to 123; Gunter vs. Halsey, Amb., 586; Kine vs. Balfe, 2 Ball & B., 343; Morphett vs. Jones, 1 Swanst., 172 ; Pilling vs. Armitage, 12 Ves., 78; France vs. Dawson, 14 Ves., 386; Gregory vs. … Brown.