Case law

Knotts v. Psychiatric Security Review Board

250 Or. App. 448 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 13, 2012

We review the board’s order for substantial evidence. ORS 183.482(8)(c). In doing so, we review both the board’s factual findings and its legal conclusions derived from those findings. Salosha, Inc. v. … That is, we assess the board’s reasoning, as expressed in its order. Id. As we have stated, “Our duty is to evaluate the board’s logic, not to supply it.” Castro v.

Fields v. Workmen's Compensation Board

276 Or. 805 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 26, 1976

Petitioner seeks a review of the decision of the Court of Appeals in Fields v. Workmen’s Compensation Board, 26 Or App 323 , 552 P2d 834 (1976). … Petitioner contends that the Court of Appeals erred in holding that the Workmen’s Compensation Board had no jurisdiction under ORS 656.278(1) to reconsider a claim which was initially determined to be noncompensable and where

Ritchie v. Board of Parole

35 Or. App. 711 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 8, 1978

On November 18, 1977, the Board of Parole hearings officer denied the request for a Board appointed attorney to represent him at the parole revocation hearing. … California, 372 US 353 , 83 S Ct 814 , 9 L Ed 2d 811 (1963); Ross v. Moffitt, 417 US 600 , 94 S Ct 2437 , 41 L Ed 2d 341 (1974)), the Supreme Court in Gagnon v. Scarpelli, supra, and Morrisséy v.

Coffey v. BOARD OF GEOLOGIST EXAMINERS

348 Or. 494 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 9, 2010

See Meltebeke v. … In PGE v.

West v. Board of Parole

86 Or. App. 616 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 29, 1987

Petitioner seeks review of the Parole Board order which set his parole date. … It might seem — given petitioner’s admissions — that the Board should be able to consider the juvenile adjudications, expunged or not. The Board’s rules provide otherwise.

Coffey v. BOARD OF GEOLOGIST EXAMINERS

347 Or. 317 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 5, 2009

221 P.3d 748 (2009) 347 Or. 317 COFFEY v. BOARD OF GEOLOGIST EXAMINERS. No. (S057511). Supreme Court of Oregon. November 5, 2009. Petition for Review Allowed.

State Land Board v. Heuker

25 Or. App. 137 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 19, 1976

State ex rel Thornton v. Hay, 254 Or 584, 601-602 , 462 P2d 671 (1969) (specially concurring opinion); Corvallis & Eastern R. Co. v. Benson, 61 Or 359, 369-70 , 121 P 418 (1912). Cf., Land Bd. v. … In McAdam v.

Betsch v. Board of Parole

109 Or. App. 155 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 2, 1991

PER CURIAM Petitioner challenges an order of the Board of Parole. Because he did not exhaust his administrative remedies under ORS 144.335(1), we lack jurisdiction to review the order. … The crux of petitioner’s challenge to the Board’s order is that a special condition of his parole, that he stay out of Klamath County, is unconstitutional. That condition was imposed by an order dated June 22, 1990.

Wester v. State Land Board

231 Or. 405 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 6, 1962

Dean v. First Nat’l Bank, 217 Or 340, 375 , 341 P2d 512 (1959); Pioneer Trust Co. v. Thielsen, 199 Or 206, 214 , 258 P2d 788 (1953); Heimbigner v. U. S. Natl. Bank, 190 Or 592, 597 , 227 P2d 827 (1951); Schramm v. U. S. … Rowe v. Rowe, 219 Or 599, 608 , 347 P2d 968 (1959); Heimbigner v. U. S. Natl. Bank, supra, 190 Or at 596 , 227 P2d 827 (1951); Miller v. Smith, 179 Or 214, 219 , 170 P2d 583 (1946); Hansem v.

Coleman v. Board of Parole

215 Or. App. 112 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 19, 2007

App. 112 COLEMAN v. BOARD OF PAROLE and Post-Prison Supervision. Court of Appeals of Oregon. September 19, 2007. Affirmed without opinion.

GTE Northwest Inc. v. Public Utility Commission

321 Or. 458 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 24, 1995

Nollan v. … See Dept. of Trans. v.

Sehlbrede v. State Land Board

46 Or. 615 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 24, 1905

State Land Board has authority,.by virtue of its power to make rules and regulations for the transaction of its business, etc., to act for and bind the State by such waiver: Miller v. … The full and complete. discussion of the question in the recent case of Maffet v. Oregon & Cal. R. Co. 46 Or. 443 ( 80 Pac. 489 ), renders needless its further consideration at this time. 3.

Northwest Environmental Defense Center v. Brown

476 F. Supp. 2d 1188 · District Court, D. Oregon · Mar 1, 2007

Before the court are State Defendants’ (Marvin Brown, Oregon State Forester, and members of the Oregon Board of Forestry, Stephen Hobbs, Barbara Craig, Diane Snyder, Larry Giustina, Chris Heffernan, William Hutchison, and … See Newton County Wildlife Ass’n v. Rogers, 141 F.3d 803, 810 (8th Cir.1998); O'Aha ‘Ino v. Galiher, 28 F.Supp.2d 1258, 1261 (D.Hawai'i 1998). Another case, North Carolina Shellfish Growers Ass’n v.

Thompson v. Board of Parole

111 Or. App. 444 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 12, 1992

State Land Board v. Schroetlin

161 Or. 146 · Oregon Supreme Court · Feb 28, 1939

v. … In State Land Board v.

Tharp v. Psychiatric Security Review Board

338 Or. 413 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 14, 2005

Accordingly, the board asserted that, as this court held in Einstein v. … affirmed the board’s order, citing two cases, Rios v.

Brown v. Driver & Motor Vehicle Services Division

219 Or. App. 607 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 7, 2008

State v. Newton, 291 Or 788, 807 , 636 P2d 393 (1981), overruled on other grounds by State v. Spencer, 305 Or 59 , 750 P2d 147 (1988). … Walls v. DMV, 154 Or App 101, 107 , 960 P2d 888 (1998).

Brown v. Department of Corrections

120 Or. App. 239 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 12, 1993

Whaley v. Dept. of Corrections, 120 Or App 224 , 852 P2d 200 (1993).

Payless Drug Stores Northwest, Inc. v. Brown

80 Or. App. 255 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 2, 1986

Payless Drug Stores v. Brown, 300 Or 243 , 708 P2d 1143 (1985). Defendants appealed a judgment against them for $117.74, plus costs. … See Brown v. Multnomah County Dist. Ct, 280 Or 95, 100 , 570 P2d 52 (1977); Nordling v. Johnston, 205 Or 315, 324 , 283 P2d 994 , 287 P2d 420 (1955).

Howard v. Board of Parole

345 Or. 417 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 26, 2008

198 P.3d 941 (2008) 345 Or. 417 HOWARD v. BOARD OF PAROLE. No. (S056612). Supreme Court of Oregon. November 26, 2008. Petition for review denied.