Case law

Brown v. District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 2, 2011

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA YVONNE BROWN, Plaintiff, v. … Lutkewitte v. Gonzales, 436 F.3d 248, 252-54 (D.C.

Brown v. District of Columbia

66 F. Supp. 2d 41 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 8, 1999

It also states the Board’s conclusion that Brown posed a “threat to self and others due to the alleged incident involving correctional staff,” concluding with the statement “Resident Brown assaulted Cpl. Parks.” … See Brown v. Plant, 131 F.3d 163 (D.C.Cir.1997). The Court concludes that plaintiff did not receive adequate process under Hewitt .

Harris v. District of Columbia

696 F. Supp. 2d 123 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 22, 2010

Brown v. Bureau of Prisons, 498 F.Supp.2d 298, 301 (D.D.C.2007); see Marshall v. … Brown v. Carr, 503 A.2d 1241, 1245 (D.C.App.1986). In Brown, the District of Columbia Court of Appeals relied on the approach taken by the California state courts and cited with approval their reasoning.

Brown v. Pro Football, Inc.

821 F. Supp. 20 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 12, 1993

Ago v. Begg, Inc., 705 F.Supp. 613, 616 (D.D.C.1988), aff'd, 911 F.2d 819 (D.C.Cir.1990). … V. DEFENDANTS’ REQUEST FOR ORAL ARGUMENT. Defendants have requested that these motions be addressed at oral argument.

Brown v. District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 3, 2011

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA YVONNE BROWN, Plaintiff, v. … That Plaintiff Yvonne Brown was subjected to a sexually hostile work environment? YES. [...] 2.

Fields, Beverly v. Off Eddie Johnson

459 F.3d 1 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 18, 2006

Relying on Browning v. Clerk, U.S. … Brewster, 408 U.S. at 528 , 92 S.Ct. 2531 ; see Brown & Williamson Tobacco Corp. v. Williams, 62 F.3d 408, 415 (D.C.Cir.1995).

Brown v. Federal Bureau of Investigation

744 F. Supp. 2d 120 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 29, 2010

BACKGROUND The background of this case is discussed fully in Brown v. FBI, 675 F.Supp.2d 122 (D.D.C.2009). … Brown’s motion for leave to amend therefore will be denied also with respect to this proposed amendment. Cf . Adair v.

Brown v. Alves

377 F. App'x 18 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 26, 2010

See Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C.Cir.2004). Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition 'will not be published.

Brown v. Metropolitan Life Ins.

100 F.2d 98 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 29, 1938

Browne, husband of appellant, died February 29, 1936. At the time of his death, there were in existence four industrial insurance policies on his life, totalling $2,351.56. … We held in Shellman v.

Brown v. Columbia Sussex Corporation

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 25, 2010

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ANTONIO BROWN, ) ) Plaintiff, … See Shamrock Oil & Gas Corp. v. Sheets, 313 U.S. 100, 108 (1941); LaPoint v. Mid-Atlantic Settlement Servs., 256 F. Supp. 2d 1,3 (D.D.C. 2003).

Brown v. General Truck Sales, Inc.

155 A.2d 718 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 19, 1959

Brown v. Alves

377 F. App'x 18 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 26, 2010

See Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C.Cir.2004). Pursuant to D.C. Circuit Rule 36, this disposition 'will not be published.

Brown v. 1301 K Street Ltd. Partnership

31 A.3d 902 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 23, 2011

Brown’s reliance on Meiggs v. Associated Builders, Inc., 545 A.2d 631 (D.C.1988), is misplaced. … Thoma v.

Brown v. Baradel

360 F. App'x 162 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 4, 2010

See Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C.Cir.2004). That rule requires “a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 8(a).

Brown v. Artery Organization, Inc.

691 F. Supp. 1459 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 8, 1987

See Reynolds v. Sheet Metal Workers, Local 102, 702 F.2d 221, 226 (D.C.Cir.1981). … See Orantes-Hernandez v. Smith, 541 F.Supp. 351 (C.D.Cal.1982); Bartels v. Biernat, 405 F.Supp. 1012, 1019 (E.D.Wis.1975); Bass v.

Brown v. Baradel

360 F. App'x 162 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 4, 2010

See Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C.Cir.2004). That rule requires “a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 8(a).

Brown v. Psi Services, Inc.

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 13, 2010

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ANGELINA BROWN, Plaintiff, v. … Stella v. Mineta, 284 F.3d 135, 145 (D.C. Cir. 2002) (citing Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 452 (D.C. Cir. 1999)).

Brown v. D.C. Public Schools

District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 28, 2010

See Docket Entry #6 (captioned as "REPLY to opposition to motion re MOTION to Dismiss and/or for More Definite Statement to Plaintiff's Motion to Remand filed by DANNY BROWN." (emphasis omitted)). … (quoting Foman v. Davis, 371 U.S. 178, 181 (1962))).

Brown v. McCarthy

368 F. App'x 145 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 18, 2010

See Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668-71 (D.C.Cir. 2004). That rule requires “a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief,” Fed.

Alaska Movers Ass'n v. Brown

445 F. Supp. 363 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 25, 1978

Schraier v. Hickel, 136 U.S.App.D.C. 81 , 419 F.2d 663 (1969); Gonzalez v. Freeman, 118 U.S.App. D.C. 180, 334 F.2d 570 (1964); Copper Plumbing & Heating Co. v. Campbell, 110 U.S.App.D.C. 177 , 290 F.2d 368 (1961).