Case law

Oglala Sioux Tribe v. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comm'n

896 F.3d 520 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 20, 2018

Ctr. v. Sebelius, 566 F.3d 193, 199 (D.C. … Chenery Corp., 318 U.S. at 87-88; see NLRB v.

United States v. Medina

628 F. Supp. 2d 52 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 24, 2009

(Decl. of Devon Brown at ¶ 9.) After giving the DOC the “wide ranging deference” that is required by the Supreme Court, Bell v. … See, e.g., Bell v.

Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad

380 F.2d 605 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 19, 1967

E.g., United States v. L. A. Tucker Truck Lines, Inc., 344 U.S. 33, 37 , 73 S.Ct. 67 , 97 L.Ed. 54 (1952); Bower v. … Trainmen v. Certain Carriers, 121 U.S.App.D.C. 230, 232 , 349 F.2d 207 , 209 n. 7 (1965). . E.g., Bowman v. Curt G. Joa, Inc., 361 F.2d 706, 716 (4th Cir. 1966); Cranston Print Works Co. v.

Wolf v. District of Columbia

597 A.2d 1303 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 4, 1991

They rely on District of Columbia v. … Safeway Stores, Inc. v.

United States v. Henson

486 F.2d 1292 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 17, 1973

In Cummings v. … McGautha v.

Kaseman v. District of Columbia

444 F.3d 637 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 31, 2006

Fund v. EPA, 672 F.2d 42, 62 (D.C. Cir. 1982). We have no cause to question the reasoning of Moore and Environmental Defense Fund, but the “semantic strain” between direct and implied causes of action, Brown v. … Zipperer v. Sch. Bd. of Seminole County, Fla., 111 F.3d 847, 851 (11th Cir. 1997); Brown, 12 F.3d at 683; Eggers v. Bullitt County Sch. Dist., 854 F.2d 892, 898 (6th Cir. 1988).

Rogler v. Biglow

610 F. Supp. 2d 103 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 29, 2009

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C.Cir.2002). “[A] complaint needs some information about the circumstances *105 giving rise to the claims.” Aktieselskabet AF 21. Nov. 2001 v. … See Brown v. District of Columbia, 514 F.3d 1279, 1283 (D.C.Cir.2008). 3 . Ms. Rogler appears to be attempting to state a cause of action under Bivens v.

In re LeFande

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 2, 2025

Title v. Warren, 265 F. Supp. 3d 17, 21-23 (D.D.C. 2017). He would instead need to assert any privileges on a question-by- question basis. Id. … The other four members of the Board recommend disbarment.

Harry Joseph Pollack and Arthur Morton Pollack v. Joy R. Simonson

350 F.2d 740 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 3, 1965

Compare Melody Music, Inc. v. Federal Communications Comm., 120 U.S.App.D.C. -, 345 F.2d 730 , decided April 8, 1965; Hornsby v. Allen, 326 F.2d 605 (5th Cir. 1964); Yick Wo v. … See Hornsby v. Allen, supra, note 4 .

Wright v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

924 A.2d 284 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 3, 2007

Wright argues that the Compensation Review Board (“Review Board”) erroneously applied our decision in Estate of Underwood v. … Bank, FSB v.

In re Hodges

756 A.2d 389 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 13, 2000

R. 56(c) (2000); Big Builders, Inc. v. Israel, 709 A.2d 74 , 76 n. 1 (D.C.1998). … Brown's affidavit relates that as of September 1995 Mr.

Younger v. District of Columbia Public Schools

60 F. Supp. 3d 130 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 25, 2014

When she returned in the fall, however, it became clear that her only full-time teaching option was at the Woodson 9th Grade Academy located at Ron Brown Middle School. … See Irwin v.

National Semiconductor Corp. v. Ramtron Internatonal Corp.

265 F. Supp. 2d 71 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 5, 2003

Estee Lauder Inc. v. L’Oreal, S.A, 129 F.3d 588, 592 (Fed.Cir.1997). … .”); Nitz v.

Prince v. United States

825 A.2d 928 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 5, 2003

See Cauthen v. United States, 592 A.2d 1021, 1022 (D.C.1991) (reasonable suspicion); Brown v. United States, 590 A.2d 1008,1020 (D.C. 1991) (probable cause). … United States v. Brown, 150 U.S.App. D.C. 113, 114, 463 F.2d 949, 950 (1972) (emphasis in original; citations omitted). 8 .

Allen v. Card

799 F. Supp. 158 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 28, 1992

In Mai v. … Cornetta v.

Windsor Redding Care Center, LLC v. NLRB

944 F.3d 294 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 10, 2019

Fred Meyer Stores, Inc. v. NLRB, 865 F.3d 630, 638 (D.C. Cir. 2017) (quoting Pirlott v. NLRB, 522 F.3d 423, 432 (D.C. Cir. 2008)). … Just as the board may not “totally ignore[] facts in the record,” Fred Meyer Stores, 865 F.3d at 638, the Board is obligated to give “attentive consideration” to the ALJ’s decision, Greater Boston Television Corp. v.

Reeder v. James

121 F. Supp. 3d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 14, 2015

Military records are reviewed by the civilian boards for correction of military records, and federal courts review final decisions made by the civilian records correction boards under the APA. Remmie v. … Rudo v. Geren, 818 F.Supp.2d 17, 25-26 (D.D.C.2011) (quoting Frizelle v. Slater, 111 F.3d 172, 176 . (D.C.Cir.1997)).

Waterhouse v. District of Columbia

124 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 13, 2000

Cabbell and Williams are African-American, Dong is Asian-American, and Triggs and Brown are Caucasian. … v.

Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific Railroad

248 F. Supp. 1008 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 12, 1966

Fire. & Eng. v. Chicago, B. & Q. R. … Board 282.”

Konvalinka v. United States

162 A.2d 778 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 19, 1960

v. … United States, 97 U.S.App.D.C. 291 , 231 F.2d 244 ; Brown v. United States, 80 U.S.App.D.C. 270 , 152 F.2d 138 .