Case law

Preferred Building Services, Inc. v. NLRB

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 21, 2026

Co. v. … Processing, Inc. v. NLRB, 176 F.4th 690, 705 (D.C. Cir. 2026) (quoting Consolidated Freightways v. NLRB, 669 F.2d 790, 794 (D.C.

Gold v. STATE PLAZA, INC.

481 F. Supp. 2d 43 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 5, 2006

Gold, Regional Director of Region 5 of the National Labor Relations Board (herein the Board) for a temporary injunction under Section 10(j) of the National Labor Relations Act (herein the Act), 29 U.S.C. … Petitioner is the Regional Director of Region Five of the Board, an administrative agency of the United States government, and files this Petition for and on behalf of the unanimous Board. 2.

Bredehoft v. Alexander

686 A.2d 586 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 23, 1996

Williams v. Board of Trustees of Mount Jezreel Baptist Church, 589 A.2d 901, 910 (D.C.1991); Kleiman v. Aetna, supra, 581 A.2d at 1266 . A. … Cooter & Gell v. Hartman Corp., 496 U.S. 384, 405 , 110 S.Ct. 2447, 2460-61 , 110 L.Ed.2d 359 (1990); Park v.

Thrifty Payless, Inc. v. NLRB

86 F.4th 909 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 3, 2023

In reviewing the Board’s decision, we must accept its factual findings so long as they are supported by substantial evidence.3 Allentown Mack Sales & Serv., Inc. v. … Because there is a mechanism for the Board to consider challenges to its own sua sponte actions, a party must give the Board the first go at resolving such arguments. See Spectrum Health-Kent Cmty. Campus v.

Temple Univ. Hosp., Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

929 F.3d 729 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 9, 2019

The Board merely assumed arguendo the doctrine applies. Having rejected the Board’s analysis of the New Hampshire v. … If the Board determines that judicial estoppel is available in appropriate circumstances, then under New Hampshire v.

Roberts v. Geren

530 F. Supp. 2d 24 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 27, 2007

A reviewing court will ‘uphold a decision of less than ideal clarity if the [board’s] path may reasonably be discerned.’ ” Dickson v. Sec’y of Defense, 68 F.3d 1396, 1404 (D.C.Cir.1995) (quoting Bowman Transp., Inc. v. … Co., Inc. v.

In Re Schneider

951 A.2d 798 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 3, 2008

XI, § 11(d). 2 The Board on Professional Responsibility (“Board”) has now recommended that identical reciprocal discipline of disbarment be imposed. … Attorney Grievance Comm’n of Maryland v. Schneider, 399 Md. 679 , 926 A.2d 198 (2007). 2 .

Frank Palacios v. Richard Spencer

906 F.3d 124 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 12, 2018

RICHARD V. … The Naval Discharge Review Board denied both of his requests. Palacios then asked the Board for Correction of Naval Records to correct his records. The Correction Board denied his request in 2010.

Judicial Watch, Inc. v. U.S. Dep't of State

373 F. Supp. 3d 142 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 13, 2019

Brown, the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Intelligence Policy and Coordination in State's Bureau of Intelligence and Research. … Brown explains in detail why this is so.

In Re Arneja

790 A.2d 552 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 31, 2002

The Board recommends that Arneja be suspended from the practice of law for one year. Bar Counsel contests the Board’s failure to find misappropriation of client funds on two grounds. … On or about October 2, 1995, following his discharge by Gonzalez, Arneja filed a complaint in the United States District Court for the District of Columbia entitled Gonzalez, et al. v.

General Railway Signal Co. v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

527 F. Supp. 359 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 13, 1979

The Court of Claims has paraphrased this standard in Marley v. U. … Moreover, in an action properly before an appeals body, “the statute of limitations for the institution of suit thereon cannot commence to run until final board action occurs.” Conn v.

Michael Ellis, Appellees/cross-Appellants v. District of Columbia, Appellants/cross-Appellees

84 F.3d 1413 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 28, 1996

“determines (in its broad discretion) that the necessary prerequisites exist” (Board of Pardons v. … Morrissey v.

In Re Grand Jury Subpoenas

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 13, 2026

& BOARD OF GOVERNORS OF THE FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM, Petitioner, v. … United States v.

Wang v. 1624 U Street, Inc.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 24, 2021

Compare Ortberg v. … She merely responded to a process (the liquor license protest process) in a forum (the Board) that Chi Cha initiated. See Shin v.

Alkanani v. Aegis Defense Services, LLC

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 16, 2013

____________________________ ) KHADIM ALKANANI, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. … DATE: September 16, 2013 Ketanji Brown Jackson KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District Judge

Air Line Pilots Association, International v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Aaxico Airlines, Inc., Saturn Airways, Inc., Intervenors

360 F.2d 837 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 28, 1966

AAXICO Airlines, Inc. v. Air Lines Pilots Ass’n, 331 F.2d 433 (5th Cir.), cert. denied 379 U.S. 933 , 85 S.Ct. 333 , 13 L.Ed.2d 344 (1964). … In Flight Engineers’ Int’l Ass’n, etc. v. CAB, 118 U.S.App.D.C. 112 , 332 F. 2d 312 (1964), similar contentions were before us.

Lewis-Hall Iron Works v. Blair

23 F.2d 972 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 3, 1928

This court will take judicial notice of the Board’s rules when regularly promulgated. Goldsmith v. Board of Tax Appeals, 55 App. D. … See Weaver v. Blair, Commissioner (C. C. A.) 19 F.(2d) 16 , and Reliance Mfg. Co. v. Blair, Commissioner (C. C.

Lotus v. United States of America

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 7, 2014

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) R-LOTUS: Justice, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. … Date: November 7, 2014 Ketanji Brown Jackson KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District Judge 3

Artis v. Bernanke

315 F.R.D. 420 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 8, 2013

Niedermeier v. Office of Baucus, 153 F.Supp.2d 23, 28 (D.D.C.2001). … V.

Universal Airline, Inc. v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc.

188 F.2d 993 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 23, 1951

The collision from which this case arose also gave rise to the case of Kuhn v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 87 U.S.App. D.C. 130, 183 F.2d 839 . … Boske v. Comingore, 177 U.S. 459, 469, 470 , 20 S.Ct. 701 , 44 L.Ed. 846 ; Harris v. Walsh, 51 App.D.C. 167 , 277 F. 569 ; Ex parte Sackett, 9 Cir., 74 F.2d 922 ; Louisville & N. R. Co. v.