Case law

Heller v. District of Columbia

290 F.R.D. 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 20, 2013

Bd. of Nassau County, Fla. v. … Parson and Brown can still contest D.C. Code § 7-2502.03(a)(11) in a separate suit. Not every Second Amendment challenge need be captioned Heller v. District of Columbia. IV.

In re Winick

866 A.2d 51 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 13, 2005

No exceptions to the Board’s Report and Recommendation have been filed. … Winick, case No. 88,765, 703 So.2d 478 (Fla.1997), 4 two years with a requirement to prove fitness prior to reinstatement in The Florida Bar v. Winick, case No. 92,936, 5 and three years in The Florida Bar v.

Alphabet Workers Union-Communication Workers v. NLRB

134 F.4th 1217 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 22, 2025

Granted, we have also said that “changed circumstances” do not “[g]enerally” render “a Board order moot.” NLRB v. Maywood Plant of Grede Plastics, 628 F.2d 1, 7 (D.C. Cir. 1980) (citing NLRB v. … Alvarez v.

Thrifty Payless, Inc. v. NLRB

86 F.4th 909 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 3, 2023

In reviewing the Board’s decision, we must accept its factual findings so long as they are supported by substantial evidence.3 Allentown Mack Sales & Serv., Inc. v. … Because there is a mechanism for the Board to consider challenges to its own sua sponte actions, a party must give the Board the first go at resolving such arguments. See Spectrum Health-Kent Cmty. Campus v.

Emanuel Medical Center, Turlock, California v. Sebelius

37 F. Supp. 3d 348 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 17, 2014

v. … v.

L. J. Christopher Co. of Delaware v. Commissioner

55 F.2d 530 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 14, 1931

It was held in United Thacker Coal Co. v. Commissioner (C. C. … To the same effect are: Trustees for The Ohio & Big Sandy Coal Co. v. Commissioner (C. C. A.) 43 F.(2d) 782 ; Pantages Theater Co. v. Lucas (C. C. A.) 42 F.(2d) 810 ; Greylock Mills v. Commissioner (C. C.

The Communist Party of the United States of America v. United States

384 F.2d 957 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 3, 1967

I The Board order which appellant is charged with failing to obey was before the United States Supreme Court in Communist Party v. Subversive Activities Control Board, 367 U.S. 1 , 81 S.Ct. 1357 , 6 L.Ed.2d 625 (1961). … Should not this court, especially in view of its recent decision in Albertson v. Subversive Activities Control Board * * * overrule United States v. Kahriger * * * and Lewis v. United States * * *?”

Curtis v. Peters

107 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 24, 2000

Chevron v. Natural Resources Defense Council, 467 U.S. 837, 842-43 , 104 S.Ct. 2778 , 81 L.Ed.2d 694 (1984); see North Broward Hospital District v. Shalala, 172 F.3d 90, 93 (D.C.Cir.1999); Small v. … See Chevron v.

Soliman v. Mayorkas

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 6, 2026

Individuals on the No Fly List are prohibited from boarding an 3 aircraft, and individuals on the Selectee List undergo enhanced screening before boarding an aircraft. … Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002) (rule 12(b)(6) case). I.

Montgomery v. Leftwich, Moore & Douglas

161 F.R.D. 224 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 25, 1995

Brown, a nationally known figure, had agreed to be the chairman of the entity’s board of directors; and that other investors would be contributing amounts of money equal to Montgomery’s share. Am.Compl. at 9-12. … United States v. Zolin, 491 U.S. 554, 562 , 109 S.Ct. 2619, 2626 , 105 L.Ed.2d 469 (1989) (quoting Fisher v. United States, 425 U.S. 391, 403 , 96 S.Ct. 1569, 1577 , 48 L.Ed.2d 39 (1976)).

Universal Airline, Inc. v. Eastern Air Lines, Inc.

188 F.2d 993 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 23, 1951

The collision from which this case arose also gave rise to the case of Kuhn v. Civil Aeronautics Board, 87 U.S.App. D.C. 130, 183 F.2d 839 . … Boske v. Comingore, 177 U.S. 459, 469, 470 , 20 S.Ct. 701 , 44 L.Ed. 846 ; Harris v. Walsh, 51 App.D.C. 167 , 277 F. 569 ; Ex parte Sackett, 9 Cir., 74 F.2d 922 ; Louisville & N. R. Co. v.

United States v. Maddox

238 F.3d 437 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 12, 2001

Although the Board acknowledged that under Blair-Bey v. Quick, 151 F.3d 1036 (D.C. … The Board is an independent decision maker. See D.C. Code s 24-201.2(a)(4) (1981); Barnes v. District of Columbia Board of Parole, 759 A.2d 1073, 1075-76 (D.C. 2000) (and cases cited); cf. United States v.

The City of San Antonio and the San Antonio Chamber of Commerce v. Civil Aeronautics Board, the Greater Tampa Chamber of Commerce, the City of Tampa, and the County of Hillsborough, Florida v. Civil Aeronautics Board, State of Wisconsin v. Civil Aeronautics Board

374 F.2d 326 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 3, 1967

The GREATER TAMPA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, the City of Tampa, and the County of Hillsborough, Florida, Petitioners, v. CIVIL AERONAUTICS BOARD, Respondent. STATE OF WISCONSIN, Petitioner, v. … Civil Aeronautics Board v. State Airlines, Inc., 338 U.S. 572, 576 , 70 S.Ct. 379 , 94 L.Ed. 353 (1950).

Murphy v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

935 A.2d 1066 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 8, 2007

In Spring Valley Wesley Heights Citizens Ass’n v. … See also Baltimore Transit Co. v.

Lotus v. United States of America

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 7, 2014

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) R-LOTUS: Justice, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. … Date: November 7, 2014 Ketanji Brown Jackson KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District Judge 3

CP Anchorage Hotel 2, LLC v. NLRB

98 F.4th 314 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 9, 2024

NLRB v. Acme Indus. Co., 385 U.S. 432, 435-36 (1967). … Workers Union Loc. 204 v. NLRB, 447 F.3d 821, 827 (D.C. Cir. 2006) (quoting Fibreboard Paper Prods. Corp. v. NLRB, 379 U.S. 203, 216 (1964)).

Aviel v. Gor

District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 4, 2025

Because “removal [power] is incident[al] to the power of appointment,” the Board retains the authority to hire and fire the IAF’s president. Free Enter. Fund v. Pub. Co. Acct. … Council, Inc. v. Morton, 337 F.

Paul N. Carlin v. John R. McKean Individually and as a Member of the Board of Governors of the U.S. Postal Service

823 F.2d 620 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 17, 1987

The only mention of this argument in Board of Governors v. … Fletcher v.

District of Columbia v. Keyes

362 A.2d 729 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 23, 1976

Board of Finance and Revenue, 409 Pa. 180 , 185 A.2d 542 (1962), cert. denied, 372 U.S. 958 , 83 S.Ct. 1015 , 10 L.Ed.2d 12 (1963); Calvert Distillers Corp. v. … Board of Finance and Revenue, 376 Pa. 476 , 103 A.2d 668 (1954). 8 .

Murray v. Stempson

633 A.2d 48 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 10, 1993

After exhausting those administrative avenues, appellant then retains the option of securing judicial review if he is dissatisfied with the decision of the Board. See Simpson v. … While § 24-430(b) states that the "decision of the board shall be final,” we have no doubt that judicial review of a board decision is available. See Shaughnessy v.