Case law

Cook v. Trump

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 9, 2025

See Myers v. … Taylor v.

Judicial Watch, Inc. v. U.S. Dep't of State

373 F. Supp. 3d 142 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 13, 2019

Brown, the Deputy Assistant Secretary for Intelligence Policy and Coordination in State's Bureau of Intelligence and Research. … Brown explains in detail why this is so.

Prince v. Rice

570 F. Supp. 2d 123 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 14, 2008

Stella v. Mineta, 284 F.3d 135, 145 (D.C.Cir.2002) (citing Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 452 (D.C.Cir.1999)). … See Brown Decl. ¶ 6.

United States v. Ginyard, Sean

444 F.3d 648 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 7, 2006

Oregon, 406 U.S. 404 (1972), and Johnson v. Louisiana, 406 U.S. 356 (1972)), and restricts the exercise of Rule 23(b) dismissals. In United States v. Brown, 823 F.2d 591 (D.C. … Brown, 823 F.2d at 595-96; United States v. Thomas, 116 F.3d 606, 620 (2d Cir. 1997). Contrary to the views of the parties, Brown, 823 F.2d 591, does not control the outcome of this appeal.

In Re Slattery

766 A.2d 561 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 8, 2001

Attorney Grievance Comm’n of Md. v. Slattery, 351 Md. 240 , 718 A.2d 211 (1998). … XI, § 11(d), and referred the matter to the Board on Professional Responsibility (“Board”).

Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. Air Line Pilots Association, International

808 F.2d 76 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 6, 1987

See Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. FAA, 795 F.2d 195 , 200 (D.C.Cir.1986). 8 . Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. … Diamond v. Terminal Ry. Ala. State Docks, 421 F.2d 228, 233 (5th Cir.1970). 20 . Union Pac. R.R. v.

Stewart v. United States

687 A.2d 576 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 23, 1996

Brown observed the injured man enter a blue vehicle. Brown’s testimony was corroborated by another witness, Mr. Johnson. … See Cooke v. United States, 107 U.S.App. D.C. 223, 224, 275 F.2d 887, 888 (D.C.Cir.1960); Wilson v. United States, 91 U.S.App. D.C. 135, 136, 198 F.2d 299, 300 (D.C.Cir.1952); Townley v.

Crooks v. Mabus

104 F. Supp. 3d 86 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 20, 2015

Power & Light Co. v. … Cir. 1977); Smith v. Harvey, 541 F.

United Transportation Union v. National Railroad Passenger

882 F. Supp. 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 24, 1995

International v. … United Transportation Union v. National R.R. Passenger Corp., Public Law Board No. 5347, Award and Order at 8 (1993).

Reynolds v. Steward St. Elizabeth's Med. Ctr. of Bos., Inc.

364 F. Supp. 3d 37 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 7, 2019

By letter dated September 23, 2015, the Appeals Board notified Mr. … Network, Inc. v. Brown & Brown, Inc. , 867 F.Supp.2d 153 , 170 (D. Mass. 2012) (quoting Murphy v. Ford Motor Co. , 170 F.R.D. 82 , 85 (D. Mass. 1997) ).

In Re Gallagher

886 A.2d 64 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 27, 2005

See In re Shieh, 738 A.2d 814, 816-17 (D.C.1999); Jerome Mgmt. v. District of Columbia Rental Hous. Comm’n, 682 A.2d 178, 183 (D.C.1996). … See, e.g., Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36, 59 , 124 S.Ct. 1354 , 158 L.Ed.2d 177 (2004). Here, respondent has not argued defects in notice.

United States ex rel. New River Co. v. Morgenthau

105 F.2d 50 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 3, 1939

Brown, Jr. The will authorized the trustee to collect the income and to distribute the net amount to the extent of $200,000 annually to the widow. … Cole v. Helvering, 64 App.D.C. 35 , 73 F.2d 852 .

Hahn v. District of Columbia Water & Sewer Authority

727 A.2d 317 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 25, 1999

Carlisle v. … Co. v. Brown, 593 A.2d 184, 185 (D.C.1991)). In declining to vacate the summary judgment, the trial court did not abuse its discretion here.

Blackman v. District of Columbia

355 F. Supp. 2d 171 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 3, 2005

Gates IV, on behalf of Lajuan Brown Clark, mother and next friend of the minor Francisco Beltran. … Gates IV, on behalf of Lajuan Brown Clark, mother and next friend of the minor Francisco Beltran, shall be stricken from the docket of this Court; and it is FURTHER ORDERED that this matter shall be referred to the District

Holmead v. Smith

12 F. Cas. 391 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of District of Columbia · Nov 15, 1837

S. v. Donahoo [Case No. 14,982], in this court, at December term, 1S07; and the case of the Lord Proprietary v. Brown, 1 Har. & McH. 428.

In re Edwards

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 28, 2022

Fox, III, Disciplinary Counsel, Myles V. Lynk, Senior Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, and Becky Neal, Senior Assistant Disciplinary Counsel, for petitioner. … We conclude that the Board’s recommended sanction is reasonable and appropriate.

Mitchell Van Bourg v. Paul H. Nitze, Secretary of the Navy

388 F.2d 557 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 17, 1967

The Review Board appeared to be overly concerned with this incident. However, in Harmon v. … That Congress did not intend to preclude judicial review of the action of the Correction Board is also apparent. Ashe v. McNamara, 355 F.2d 277, 280-281 (1st Cir. 1965); see Hertzog v.

Droop v. Ridenour

9 App. D.C. 95 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 1, 1896

C.) 331; Pendleton v. Perkins, 49 Mo. 565 ; Bank v. Paine, 13 R. I. 592. And in New York, in the case of Bank v. Wetmore, 124 N. … Van Ness v. Hyatt, 13 Pet. 294 ; Bank of Metropolis v. Guttschlick, 14 Pet. 19 ; Smith v. McCann, 24 How. 398 ; Morsell v. First National Bank, 91 U. S. 357, 360 ; Freedman’s Saving and Trust Co. v. Earle, 110 U.

Baltimore v. Clinton

900 F. Supp. 2d 21 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 25, 2012

See Camp v. … The Board has extremely broad discretion in evidentiary rulings. See Bettucci v. United States, 14 F.

Epps v. U.S. Attorney General

575 F. Supp. 2d 232 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 8, 2008

Aktieselskabet, 525 F.3d at 17 n. 4; Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C.Cir.2002). “A complaint needs some information about the circumstances giving rise to the claims.” Aktieselskabet, 525 F.3d at 17 n. 4. … See Morrissey v.