Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersIL

10,000+ results

0.65s

  • H.P. v. Bd. of Educ. of Chi.

    385 F. Supp. 3d 623 · District Court, E.D. Illinois · May 13, 2019

    Additionally, CPS must provide certain notices to parents and ensure that such notice "is in the native language of the parents, unless it clearly is not feasible to do so." 20 U.S.C. § 1415 (b)(4), (d)(2) ; 34 C.F.R. § 300.503 … The ISBE is responsible for establishing and administering this administrative review process. II.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • One Equal Voice v. Illinois Educational Labor Relations Board

    Appellate Court of Illinois · Sep 26, 2002

    Accordingly, we review the Board's decision under the clearly erroneous standard. … Without having considered the appropriate test to the given set of facts, we find that the decision of the Board was clearly erroneous.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In Re Marriage of Agustsson

    223 Ill. App. 3d 510 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Jan 8, 1992

    However, the movant carries the burden of establishing sufficient grounds to vacate. Kosten v. St. Anne’s Hospital (1985), 132 Ill. App. 3d 1073, 1080 . … Therefore, we find that the evidence clearly and convincingly meets the test articulated in Keller ( 180 Ill. App. 3d at 548 ).

    Cited 34 timesPublished
  • First of America Trust Co. v. Armstead

    171 Ill. 2d 282 · Illinois Supreme Court · Mar 21, 1996

    Either by express language or necessary implication, the act must clearly indicate that the legislature intended a retroactive application. [Citation.] … Plaintiff suggests that the amendment to the Gasoline Storage Act should not immunize arbitrary conduct of the State Fire Marshal in denying the application for registration.

    Abrogated on other grounds by Commonwealth Edison Co. v. Will County Collector, 196 Ill. 2d 27 (2001)Cited 145 timesPublished
  • Hamlyn v. ROCK ISLAND CTY. METRO. MASS TRANSIT

    964 F. Supp. 272 · District Court, C.D. Illinois · Apr 29, 1997

    The application form explicitly states: "WHO DOES NOT QUALIFY: [] Applicants whose sole disability is [] AIDS." … Plaintiff cites to three cases to support his argument that a stigma which causes psychological injury is sufficient to establish irreparable harm and an inadequate remedy at law.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • People v. Scott

    285 Ill. App. 3d 95 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Dec 3, 1996

    We believe that established precedent supports defendant’s position, rather than the State’s. … When he serves his sentence, he will qualify for the credit if he complies with the conditions of the statute. Defendant’s disorderly conduct conviction and sentence therefore are reversed.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Pekin Insurance Co. v. Centex Homes

    2017 IL App (1st) 153601 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Apr 21, 2017

    . ¶ 23 Defendants argue that Centex Real Estate qualifies as an additional insured because it was a “signatory” to the McGreal contract. … The answer, clearly, is yes. The underlying complaint alleges that it was the named insured, McGreal, who was charged with “the erection of *** a balloon wall.” The complaint further alleges that Mr.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • HGN CORP. v. Chamberlain, Hrdlicka, White, Johnson & Williams

    642 F. Supp. 1443 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Aug 29, 1986

    Third, Farrell says he never assured HGN the vessels would qualify for a tax-benefit transfer. … But Cambist affirmed the district court's dismissal of the second lawsuit on qualified immunity grounds.

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • In re Arkuszewski

    550 B.R. 374 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Aug 10, 2015

    Sections 109(h)(2) — (4) establish exceptions and a temporary exemption from the credit counseling requirement. … Neither party asserts that Arkusz-ewski has applied for or would qualify for any of these sections.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Caro v. Blagojevich

    Appellate Court of Illinois · Sep 26, 2008

    ANALYSIS To establish entitlement to preliminary injunctive relief, a plaintiff must show (1) a clearly ascertainable right in need of protection, (2) that he will suffer irreparable harm without protection of that … More clearly, though, the trial court's order states that plaintiffs "seek to enjoin the FamilyCare Program," not just a portion of it.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • In re Avaya Inc.

    602 B.R. 445 · District Court, S.D. Illinois · May 6, 2019

    This means that the estimation can be reversed only if it was based on "clearly erroneous factual findings or an incorrect legal standard." … SAE's arguments essentially call for the Court to reconsider the credibility of Avaya's qualified expert's unrebutted testimony.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Village of Chadwick v. Nelson

    95 N.E.3d 1230 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Dec 15, 2017

    The trial court rejected Talea’s contention that her farm qualified for immunity under the Act. … For example, the definition in section 2 contains no restrictions on the type or scope of agricultural activity necessary to qualify as a “farm.”

    Cited 1 timesUnpublished
  • Hiatt v. Illinois Tool Works

    431 Ill. Dec. 22 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Sep 28, 2018

    And I think it clearly says it cannot now change its theory on appeal; that’s it, on appeal. … On appeal, the plaintiffs argued that the defendant was not Rick’s employer and that, for immunity under section 5(a), the defendant must establish at least that it was legally responsible for payment of workers’ compensation

    Cited 9 timesUnpublished
  • Ali v. Village of Tinley Park

    79 F. Supp. 3d 772 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jan 7, 2015

    In addition, he was then clearly on duty — and at the station' house at that. … Ali was wearing a “clearly visible” turban and was suddenly and inexplicably sprayed.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Demick v. City of Joliet

    135 F. Supp. 2d 921 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Mar 29, 2001

    This outcome clearly conflicts with the City’s rule on appointments. And the City’s ordinance — ratifying those rules governing appointment — clearly states that it preempts any conflicting state laws. … To establish a prima facie case, Demiek must show: (1) that she belongs to a protected group; (2) that she was qualified for an open position; (3) that her employer subjected her to an adverse employment action; and (4) that

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • People v. Hernandez

    204 Ill. App. 3d 732 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Aug 15, 1990

    We further determined in Brown that, even absent the qualifying age limitation present in People v. Odle (1988), 128 Ill. 2d 111 , under the similarly worded death penalty statute (Ill. Rev. … Such references clearly were irrelevant at the guilt phase of the proceedings.

    Cited 75 timesPublished
  • United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Humiston-Keeling, Inc.

    54 F. Supp. 2d 798 · District Court, N.D. Illinois · Jul 6, 1999

    This includes establishing that: 1) Houser has a disability as defined by the ADA, 2) she was a qualified individual under the Act, 3) HK was aware of her disability, and 4) HK failed to provide her with a reasonable accommodation … QUALIFIED INDIVIDUAL HK next claims that Houser was not a qualified individual under the Act as she clearly admits that she could no longer perform the essential functions of her position even with a reasonable accommodation

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • People v. Brockman

    143 Ill. 2d 351 · Illinois Supreme Court · May 30, 1991

    Section 22.2 clearly states that liability will be imposed on responsible parties when expenses are incurred by the State. … Clearly, if liability is to attach, it is as a result of the contamination caused by the presence of unpermitted waste at the site.

    Cited 74 timesPublished
  • Chicago Riding Club for use of Klein v. Avery

    305 Ill. App. 419 · Appellate Court of Illinois · May 22, 1940

    Va. 1917) 251 F. 83 , at pages 128 and 129, the court clearly demonstrates why it holds that inchoate precedural rights are not within the saving clauses of repealing statutes. … 1933 act upon appointment of receivers; it would be to permit the plaintiff a mode of procedure found inexpedient by the state of Illinois, and, as such, repealed; it would be to allow the plaintiff a right ‘accrued or established

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • City of Springfield v. Policemen's Benevolent & Protective Ass'n, Unit No. 5

    459 Ill. Dec. 341 · Appellate Court of Illinois · Jul 27, 2021

    The City also has a civil service commission, established by city ordinance, which sets forth “standards” for City employees. … The amendment contains no qualifying language and applies on its face to “[q]ualified persons who have passed an examination for promotion.”

    Cited 1 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.