Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersDC

10,000+ results

1.74s

  • Benn v. United States

    801 A.2d 132 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 27, 2002

    (Emphasis added); accord, Jett v. Jett, 221 A.2d 925, 927 (D.C.1966). In Brown v. … See also (Rocky) Brown v.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Timus v. United States

    406 A.2d 1269 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 13, 1979

    See Franklin v. United States, supra; McKenzie v. United States, supra. Cf. Middleton v. United States, D.C.App., 305 A.2d 259 (1973); Singleton v. … See generally United States v. Edmons, 432 F.2d 577 (2d Cir. 1970); Amador-Gonzalez v. United States, 391 F.2d 308 (5th Cir. 1968); Montana v. Tomich, 332 F.2d 987 (9th Cir. 1964); United States v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • In re B. D. T.

    435 A.2d 378 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 30, 1981

    On August 21, 1979, two juveniles, one in blue and one in brown, stopped Andre Wallace after following him for a while. Wallace had with him his father’s tape recorder. … Stagecrafters Club v. District of Columbia, D.C.App., 89 A.2d 876, 878 (1952). See also Doran v. United States, 92 U.S.App.D.C. 305 , 205 F.2d 717 (1953).

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Verrett v. Stempson

    623 A.2d 120 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 6, 1993

    See Board of Pardons v. … Board of Pardons v. Allen, supra, 482 U.S. at 378-79, n. 10 , 107 S.Ct. at 2420-21, n. 10 (citations omitted). 11 .See Johnson-El v.

    Vacated by Verrett v. Stempson, 1993 D.C. App. LEXIS 299 (1993)Cited 5 timesPublished
  • William David Hensley v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

    655 F.2d 264 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 17, 1981

    O’Leary v. Brown-Pacific-Maxon, Inc., [ 340 U.S. *282 504 ] 508 [ 71 S.Ct. 470, 472 , 95 L.Ed. 483 ] (1951). O’Keeffe v. … Banks v.

    Cited 38 timesPublished
  • Harris v. Potter

    310 F. Supp. 2d 18 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 26, 2004

    See Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 458 (D.C.Cir.1999) (letters of admonishment not an adverse employment action); Walker v. … Brown, 199 F.3d at 457 .

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • Bussie v. United States

    81 A.2d 247 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 1, 1951

    In Brown v. United States, D.C. … It has been so held by Chief Judge Laws of the United States District Court, United States v. Waters, 73 F.Supp. 72 , and once before by this court, Brown v. United States, D.C. Mun.App., 66 A.2d 491 .

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Malone v. United States

    729 A.2d 888 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 27, 1999

    United States v. Brown, supra, 138 U.S.App.D.C. at 400-401 , 428 F.2d at 1102-1103 . … United States v. Brown, supra, 138 U.S.App.D.C. at 401 , 428 F.2d at 1103 (discussing Fed.R.Crim.P. 11, which is identical to Super.Ct.Crim.R. 11 in all relevant respects).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • UMDNJ-University Hospital v. Leavitt

    539 F. Supp. 2d 70 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 7, 2008

    Ass’n. v. … Inc. v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Rastall v. CSX Transportation, Inc.

    697 A.2d 46 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 26, 1997

    Sacks v. Rothberg, 569 A.2d 150, 154 (D.C.1990) (citing Dodek v. CF 16 Corp., 537 A.2d 1086 (D.C.1988)). … Brown v. United States, 567 A.2d 426, 427 (D.C.1989), cert. denied, 494 U.S. 1037 , 110 S.Ct. 1497 , 108 L.Ed.2d 632 (1990).

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • In Re Midlen

    885 A.2d 1280 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 10, 2005

    “[DJishonesty,” includes “conduct evincing ‘a lack of honesty, probity or integrity in principle; a lack of fairness and straightforwardness.’ ” In re Shorter, 570 A.2d 760, 767-68 (D.C.1990) (quoting Tucker v. … V. Accepting the Board’s alternative recommendation, we suspend Midlen for eighteen months.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Local No. 742, United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, John Foreman, Business Agent, and Harold Stolley, Steward v. National Labor Relations Board, J. L. Simmons Company, Inc., Intervenor. J. L. Simmons Company, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board

    444 F.2d 895 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 6, 1971

    444 F.2d 895 LOCAL NO. 742, UNITED BROTHERHOOD OF CARPENTERS AND JOINERS OF AMERICA, John Foreman, Business Agent, and Harold Stolley, Steward, Petitioners, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent, J. L. … See Meat & Highway Drivers, Local 710 v. NLRB, 118 U.S. App.D.C. 287, 335 F.2d 709 (1964); Truck Drivers Union Local No. 413 v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Brewer v. D.C. Financial Responsibility & Management Assistance Authority

    953 F. Supp. 406 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 17, 1997

    Board of Trustees of U.D.C., 794 F.Supp. 420, 422 (D.D.C.1992); Rasul v. District of Columbia, 680 F.Supp. 436, 439 (D.D.C.1988); Dougherty v. Barry, 604 F.Supp. 1424, 1442 (D.D.C.1985). 4 b. … See Keyishian v. Board of Regents, 385 U.S. 589, 592 , 87 S.Ct. 675, 678 , 17 L.Ed.2d 629 (1967); see also Bois v. Marsh, 801 F.2d 462 , 466 & n. 6 (D.C.Cir.1986).

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • In Re Kline

    11 A.3d 261 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 13, 2011

    However, “[w]hen the court disagrees with the Board as to the seriousness of the offense ... the Board’s recommendations are accordingly granted less weight.” … This action, styled The Ad Agency, Inc. v.

    Cited 18 timesPublished
  • McCormick v. District of Columbia

    District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 22, 2012

    McCormick says that after Defendant Brown received this transmission, Defendant Patten relayed the allegations of the Tobias incident to Defendant Brown. [Doc. 73 at 31.] … V (emphasis added).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Ramos v. United States Department of Justice

    538 F. Supp. 2d 4 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 7, 2008

    Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c); see also Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322, 106 S.Ct. 2548 , 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986); Diamond v. Atwood, 43 F.3d 1538, 1540 (D.C.Cir.1995). … Ass’n v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 463 U.S. 29, 43 , 103 S.Ct. 2856 , 77 L.Ed.2d 443 (1983); see also County of L.A. v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Bell v. United States

    817 A.2d 829 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 27, 2003

    Bell v. United States, 801 A.2d 117, 120 (2002). … Rivas v. United States, 783 A.2d 125, 129 (D.C.2001) (en banc); Johnson v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Robert Franklin v. District of Columbia

    168 F.3d 1360 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 22, 1999

    While the panel correctly ruled that Sandin v. … (We specifically left the applicability of Sandin to administrative segregation hearings open in Brown v. Plant, 131 *1362 F.3d 163 (D.C.Cir.1997)).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Sullivan v. Heritage Foundation

    399 A.2d 856 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 16, 1979

    See, e. g., Singh v. Cities Service Oil Co., 554 P.2d 1367, 1368 (Okl.1976); School Committee of Providence v. Board of Regents for Education, 112 R.I. 288 , 308 A.2d 788, 790 (1973). … The Board of Trustees may appoint such other officers as may be deemed neces *859 sary, such officers to be appointed either temporarily for a stated time or for the ensuing year and until the next annual meeting of the Board

    Cited 52 timesPublished
  • James Wilkett, D/B/A Wilkett Trucking Company v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America

    710 F.2d 861 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 24, 1983

    is or will be required by the present or future public convenience and necessity.’ ” Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. … Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Wichita Board of Trade, 412 U.S. 800, 806-09 , 93 S.Ct. 2367, 2374-75 , 37 L.Ed.2d 350 (1973); West Coast Media, Inc. v. FCC, 695 F.2d 617, 620-21 (D.C.Cir.1982).

    Cited 14 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.