Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.74s
801 A.2d 132 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 27, 2002
(Emphasis added); accord, Jett v. Jett, 221 A.2d 925, 927 (D.C.1966). In Brown v. … See also (Rocky) Brown v.
Cited 21 timesPublished406 A.2d 1269 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 13, 1979
See Franklin v. United States, supra; McKenzie v. United States, supra. Cf. Middleton v. United States, D.C.App., 305 A.2d 259 (1973); Singleton v. … See generally United States v. Edmons, 432 F.2d 577 (2d Cir. 1970); Amador-Gonzalez v. United States, 391 F.2d 308 (5th Cir. 1968); Montana v. Tomich, 332 F.2d 987 (9th Cir. 1964); United States v.
Cited 6 timesPublished435 A.2d 378 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 30, 1981
On August 21, 1979, two juveniles, one in blue and one in brown, stopped Andre Wallace after following him for a while. Wallace had with him his father’s tape recorder. … Stagecrafters Club v. District of Columbia, D.C.App., 89 A.2d 876, 878 (1952). See also Doran v. United States, 92 U.S.App.D.C. 305 , 205 F.2d 717 (1953).
Cited 5 timesPublished623 A.2d 120 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 6, 1993
See Board of Pardons v. … Board of Pardons v. Allen, supra, 482 U.S. at 378-79, n. 10 , 107 S.Ct. at 2420-21, n. 10 (citations omitted). 11 .See Johnson-El v.
Vacated by Verrett v. Stempson, 1993 D.C. App. LEXIS 299 (1993)Cited 5 timesPublishedWilliam David Hensley v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority
655 F.2d 264 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 17, 1981
O’Leary v. Brown-Pacific-Maxon, Inc., [ 340 U.S. *282 504 ] 508 [ 71 S.Ct. 470, 472 , 95 L.Ed. 483 ] (1951). O’Keeffe v. … Banks v.
Cited 38 timesPublished310 F. Supp. 2d 18 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 26, 2004
See Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 458 (D.C.Cir.1999) (letters of admonishment not an adverse employment action); Walker v. … Brown, 199 F.3d at 457 .
Cited 7 timesPublished81 A.2d 247 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 1, 1951
In Brown v. United States, D.C. … It has been so held by Chief Judge Laws of the United States District Court, United States v. Waters, 73 F.Supp. 72 , and once before by this court, Brown v. United States, D.C. Mun.App., 66 A.2d 491 .
Cited 6 timesPublished729 A.2d 888 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 27, 1999
United States v. Brown, supra, 138 U.S.App.D.C. at 400-401 , 428 F.2d at 1102-1103 . … United States v. Brown, supra, 138 U.S.App.D.C. at 401 , 428 F.2d at 1103 (discussing Fed.R.Crim.P. 11, which is identical to Super.Ct.Crim.R. 11 in all relevant respects).
Cited 1 timesPublishedUMDNJ-University Hospital v. Leavitt
539 F. Supp. 2d 70 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 7, 2008
Ass’n. v. … Inc. v.
Cited 5 timesPublishedRastall v. CSX Transportation, Inc.
697 A.2d 46 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 26, 1997
Sacks v. Rothberg, 569 A.2d 150, 154 (D.C.1990) (citing Dodek v. CF 16 Corp., 537 A.2d 1086 (D.C.1988)). … Brown v. United States, 567 A.2d 426, 427 (D.C.1989), cert. denied, 494 U.S. 1037 , 110 S.Ct. 1497 , 108 L.Ed.2d 632 (1990).
Cited 17 timesPublished885 A.2d 1280 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 10, 2005
“[DJishonesty,” includes “conduct evincing ‘a lack of honesty, probity or integrity in principle; a lack of fairness and straightforwardness.’ ” In re Shorter, 570 A.2d 760, 767-68 (D.C.1990) (quoting Tucker v. … V. Accepting the Board’s alternative recommendation, we suspend Midlen for eighteen months.
Cited 8 timesPublished444 F.2d 895 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 6, 1971
444 F.2d 895 LOCAL NO. 742, UNITED BROTHERHOOD OF CARPENTERS AND JOINERS OF AMERICA, John Foreman, Business Agent, and Harold Stolley, Steward, Petitioners, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent, J. L. … See Meat & Highway Drivers, Local 710 v. NLRB, 118 U.S. App.D.C. 287, 335 F.2d 709 (1964); Truck Drivers Union Local No. 413 v.
Cited 11 timesPublishedBrewer v. D.C. Financial Responsibility & Management Assistance Authority
953 F. Supp. 406 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 17, 1997
Board of Trustees of U.D.C., 794 F.Supp. 420, 422 (D.D.C.1992); Rasul v. District of Columbia, 680 F.Supp. 436, 439 (D.D.C.1988); Dougherty v. Barry, 604 F.Supp. 1424, 1442 (D.D.C.1985). 4 b. … See Keyishian v. Board of Regents, 385 U.S. 589, 592 , 87 S.Ct. 675, 678 , 17 L.Ed.2d 629 (1967); see also Bois v. Marsh, 801 F.2d 462 , 466 & n. 6 (D.C.Cir.1986).
Cited 7 timesPublished11 A.3d 261 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 13, 2011
However, “[w]hen the court disagrees with the Board as to the seriousness of the offense ... the Board’s recommendations are accordingly granted less weight.” … This action, styled The Ad Agency, Inc. v.
Cited 18 timesPublishedMcCormick v. District of Columbia
District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 22, 2012
McCormick says that after Defendant Brown received this transmission, Defendant Patten relayed the allegations of the Tobias incident to Defendant Brown. [Doc. 73 at 31.] … V (emphasis added).
Cited 0 timesPublishedRamos v. United States Department of Justice
538 F. Supp. 2d 4 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 7, 2008
Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c); see also Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317, 322, 106 S.Ct. 2548 , 91 L.Ed.2d 265 (1986); Diamond v. Atwood, 43 F.3d 1538, 1540 (D.C.Cir.1995). … Ass’n v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 463 U.S. 29, 43 , 103 S.Ct. 2856 , 77 L.Ed.2d 443 (1983); see also County of L.A. v.
Cited 3 timesPublished817 A.2d 829 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 27, 2003
Bell v. United States, 801 A.2d 117, 120 (2002). … Rivas v. United States, 783 A.2d 125, 129 (D.C.2001) (en banc); Johnson v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedRobert Franklin v. District of Columbia
168 F.3d 1360 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 22, 1999
While the panel correctly ruled that Sandin v. … (We specifically left the applicability of Sandin to administrative segregation hearings open in Brown v. Plant, 131 *1362 F.3d 163 (D.C.Cir.1997)).
Cited 1 timesPublishedSullivan v. Heritage Foundation
399 A.2d 856 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 16, 1979
See, e. g., Singh v. Cities Service Oil Co., 554 P.2d 1367, 1368 (Okl.1976); School Committee of Providence v. Board of Regents for Education, 112 R.I. 288 , 308 A.2d 788, 790 (1973). … The Board of Trustees may appoint such other officers as may be deemed neces *859 sary, such officers to be appointed either temporarily for a stated time or for the ensuing year and until the next annual meeting of the Board
Cited 52 timesPublished710 F.2d 861 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 24, 1983
is or will be required by the present or future public convenience and necessity.’ ” Bowman Transportation, Inc. v. … Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Wichita Board of Trade, 412 U.S. 800, 806-09 , 93 S.Ct. 2367, 2374-75 , 37 L.Ed.2d 350 (1973); West Coast Media, Inc. v. FCC, 695 F.2d 617, 620-21 (D.C.Cir.1982).
Cited 14 timesPublished
Ask Donna