Case law

In re Bryant

46 A.3d 402 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 21, 2012

The events leading to Bryant’s convictions are set forth more fully in United States v. Bryant, 655 F.3d 232 (3d Cir.2011). … The Board finds respondent’s convictions involve moral turpitude per se and recommends disbarment. The Board’s recommendation is unopposed.

Arellano v. DIST. OF COL. POLICE, ETC.

384 A.2d 29 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 8, 1978

Accord, Morgan v. Board of Appeals and Review, D.C.App., 305 A.2d 243, 245 (1973); see D.C.Code 1977 Supp., § 1-1510. … However, in Lewis v.

Kramer v. D. C. Department of Employment Services

447 A.2d 28 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 16, 1982

D.C.Code 1981, § 1-1510(a)(3)(E); see Washington Post Co. v. District Unemployment Compensation Board, D.C.App., 377 A.2d 436, 439 (1977); Wallace v. … Department of Employment Services, supra; Deiss v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 475 Pa. 547 , 381 A.2d 132 (1977).

United States v. Ronald James Toms, A/K/A Block

136 F.3d 176 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 17, 1998

Harrison, 931 F.2d at 71 ; see also Brown v. United States, 546 A.2d 390, 394 (D.C.1988). The government offers two theories as to Toms’s knowledge. … See, e.g., United States v.

Lee Memorial Hospital v. Xavier Becerra

10 F.4th 859 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 20, 2021

In Mathews v. … United States v.

In Re Blum

859 A.2d 633 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 16, 2004

XI, § 11(d) and referred the matter to the Board on Professional Responsibility (“Board”). The Board now recommends the réspondent be disbarred as reciprocal discipline. … XI, § 11(c), and our heightened deference to the Board when its recommendation is unopposed, see id. at § 11(f), we adopt the Board’s recommendation.

Affinity Healthcare Services, Inc. v. Sebelius

746 F. Supp. 2d 106 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 25, 2010

Co. v. … Ctrs. v.

Schmidt v. Spencer

319 F. Supp. 3d 386 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 8, 2018

1552 (a)(1) ; see also Roberts v. … Jackson v. Mabus , 808 F.3d 933 , 936 (D.C. Cir. 2015) ; see also Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Ass'n v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins.

Tennekoon v. Fanning

156 F. Supp. 3d 208 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 15, 2016

Albino v. United States, 78 F. Supp. 3d 148, 167 (D.D.C. 2015), citing Frizelle, 111 F.3d at 177; see also Rudo v. Geren, 818 F. … See Musengo v. White, 286 F.3d 535, 539 (D.C.

District of Columbia v. Sullivan

436 A.2d 364 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 2, 1981

In District of Columbia v. … [Capitol Hill Restoration Society, Inc. v. Moore, D.C.App., 410 A.2d 184, 188 (1979) (citations omitted); see Wells v. District of Columbia Board of Education, D.C.App., 386 A.2d 703, 706 (1978).]

Roland Belton v. United States

259 F.2d 811 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 15, 1958

The prosecution called but one eye witness, Wallace Brown. He supported appellant’s claim of self defense. … Rule 37(a) (2) F.R.Crim.P., 18 U.S.C.; Boykin v. Huff, 73 App.D.C. 378 , 121 F.2d 865 ; Williams v. United States, 88 U.S.App.D.C. 212 , 188 F.2d 41 ; accord, Shannon v.

Davis v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs

124 F. App'x 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 1, 2005

Co. v. … Crum v. General Adjustment Bureau, 738 F.2d 474, 477 (D.C.Cir.1984). Substantial evidence is what a reasonable person would accept as adequate to support a conclusion. See Richardson v.

Michael K. Frizelle v. Rodney E. Slater, Secretary of Transportation

111 F.3d 172 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 25, 1997

Decisions of the civilian board are subject to review under § 706 of the Administrative Procedures Act, 5 U.S.C. § 706 . Dickson v. Secretary of Defense, 68 F.3d 1396, 1404 (D.C.Cir.1995); Kreis v. … Jolly v.

Paul N. Carlin v. John R. McKean Individually and as a Member of the Board of Governors of the U.S. Postal Service

823 F.2d 620 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 17, 1987

The only mention of this argument in Board of Governors v. … Fletcher v.

Thorn v. Walker

912 A.2d 1192 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 21, 2006

In Brown v. Hornstein, 669 A.2d 139 (D.C.1996), a landlord moved to gain possession of residential property due to the tenant’s late and delinquent rent payment history. … .’ ” Wright, 856 A.2d at 1110 (quoting Brown, 669 A.2d at 141 ) (other citation omitted).

Saladino v. U.S. Office of Special Counsel

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 24, 2026

In general, “[f]ederal employees may contest the validity of their terminations under the [Act] in an administrative tribunal known as the Merit Systems Protection Board.” Maryland v. … (quoting Haaland v.

Aviel v. Gor

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 14, 2025

LLC v. Consumer Fin. Prot. … Berry v.

Jackson v. Bessent

District Court, District of Columbia · May 8, 2026

P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678–79 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668–71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).

Hatchet v. United States

293 F. 1010 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 3, 1923

In Billings v. United States, 42 App. D. C. 413, the admission of testimony almost identical with that objected to here was held to constitute prejudicial error. … In Ryan v. United States, 26 App. D. C. 74, 6 Ann.

Stebbins' Estate v. Helvering

121 F.2d 892 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 28, 1941

Lewis-Hall Iron Works v. Blair, 57 App.D.C. 364, 366 , 23 F.2d 972, 974 , certiorari denied 277 U.S. 592 , 48 S.Ct. 529 , 72 L.Ed. 1004 . See also Chambers v. … And in Edward Barron Estate Co. v. Commissioner, 93 F.2d 751 , the Court of Appeals of the Ninth Circuit held, as we had previously held in Chambers v.