Case law

States v. District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 23, 2019

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). Under Rule 12(b)(1), the plaintiff bears the burden of establishing jurisdiction by a preponderance of the evidence. See Lujan v. … In Jones v.

Robinson v. DIAMOND HOUSING CORPORATION

267 A.2d 833 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 20, 1970

Robinson defended on the ground that the lease was void and unenforceable under the principle set forth in Brown v. Southall Realty Co., D.C.App., 237 A.2d 834 (1968), and we affirmed the judgment in her favor. … In other words, her Edwards v. Habib defense was barred by the granting of the motion. In Diamond Housing, supra, we stated that [wjhen it is established that a lease is void and unenforceable under the Brown v.

United States v. Wyche

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 9, 2023

No. 101- 647, § 1002(c), 104 Stat. 4827; United States v. Brown, 16 F.3d 423,426 n.3 (D.C. … Williams-Davis, No. 91-cr-559-1 (TFH), ECF No. 2376; Order, United States v. Board, No. 91-cr-559-11 (TFH), ECF No. 2344. A comparison of Mr.

Benson v. Sebelius

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 24, 2011

After considering the plaintiff’s case, the review board upheld CMS’s demand for $25,868.58. Id. … v.

Malone v. United States

729 A.2d 888 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 27, 1999

United States v. Brown, supra, 138 U.S.App.D.C. at 400-401 , 428 F.2d at 1102-1103 . … United States v. Brown, supra, 138 U.S.App.D.C. at 401 , 428 F.2d at 1103 (discussing Fed.R.Crim.P. 11, which is identical to Super.Ct.Crim.R. 11 in all relevant respects).

Taylor v. Islamic Republic of Iran

881 F. Supp. 2d 19 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 2, 2012

Islamic Republic of Iran, 853 F.Supp.2d 44 (D.D.C.2012); Davis v. Islamic Republic of Iran, No. 07-cv-1302, 882 F.Supp.2d 7 (D.D.C. Mar.30, 2012), 2012 WL 1059700 ; Estate of Brown v. … .); Estate of Brown v. Islamic Republic of Iran, No. 08-cv-531, 872 F.Supp.2d 37 , 2012 WL 2562368 (D.D.C.2012) (Lamberth, C.J.); Fain v.

In Re Matzkin

665 A.2d 1388 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 26, 1995

See United States v. Matzkin, 14 F.3d 1014 (4th Cir.1994). We received a certified copy of the Fourth Circuit’s decision on December 7, 1994. … On November 30, 1994, in a written response to the Board’s recommendation, respondent asked this court to defer acting on the Board’s recommendation until the Fourth Circuit ruled on his motion.

Roland Belton v. United States

259 F.2d 811 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 15, 1958

The prosecution called but one eye witness, Wallace Brown. He supported appellant’s claim of self defense. … Rule 37(a) (2) F.R.Crim.P., 18 U.S.C.; Boykin v. Huff, 73 App.D.C. 378 , 121 F.2d 865 ; Williams v. United States, 88 U.S.App.D.C. 212 , 188 F.2d 41 ; accord, Shannon v.

Bayshore Cmty. Hosp. v. Azar

325 F. Supp. 3d 18 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 6, 2018

Hosp. v. … Corp. v.

Veritas Health Servs., Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

895 F.3d 69 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 10, 2018

Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. NLRB , 682 F.3d 65 , 67 (D.C. Cir. 2012). In particular, we defer to the Board's well-reasoned "interpretation of its own precedent," Ceridian Corp. v. NLRB , 435 F.3d 352 , 355 (D.C. … We review the Board's denial of an administrative subpoena for abuse of discretion. See SSC Mystic Operating Co. v. NLRB , 801 F.3d 302 , 330 (D.C. Cir. 2015) ; Joseph T. Ryerson & Son, Inc. v.

District of Columbia Workmen's Compensation Act. v. Frank Kelly, Inc.

554 F.2d 1075 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 4, 1976

Bruner v. United States, supra note 17; Smallwood v. Gallardo, supra note 17 ; Hallowell v. Commons, supra note 17 ; Insurance Co. v. … Udall, 123 U.S.App.D.C. 301 , 359 F.2d 615 (1965). 28 O'Leary v. Brown-Pacific Maxon, Inc., 340 U.S. 504, 508 , 71 S.Ct. 470, 472 , 95 L.Ed. 483, 487 (1951); Cardillo v. Liberty Mut. Ins.

Thorn v. Walker

912 A.2d 1192 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 21, 2006

In Brown v. Hornstein, 669 A.2d 139 (D.C.1996), a landlord moved to gain possession of residential property due to the tenant’s late and delinquent rent payment history. … .’ ” Wright, 856 A.2d at 1110 (quoting Brown, 669 A.2d at 141 ) (other citation omitted).

Application of Stephens-Adamson Mfg. Co.

262 F. 635 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 5, 1920

And the following words have been upheld: “Holeproof,” as applied to hosiery (Holeproof Hosiery Co. v. Wallach Bros., 172 Fed. 859 , 97 C. C. A. 263 ); “Cream,” as applied to rolled oats (Albers Bros. Milling Co. v. … C.] 26 Fed. 576 ); and many others, equally suggestive, referred to in 'the last case, where the opinion is by Judge Brown, afterwards Mr. Justice Brown of the Supreme Court of the United States.

United Food and Commercial Workers Union, Local 400 v. NLRB

989 F.3d 1034 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 5, 2021

Milakshmi V. Rajapakse, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, argued the cause for respondent. With her on the brief were Peter B. Robb, General Counsel, Ruth E. … “In each case, the critical inquiry is whether the objections made before the Board were adequate to put the Board on notice that the issue might be pursued on appeal.” Consol. Freightways v.

Jackson v. Bessent

District Court, District of Columbia · May 8, 2026

P. 8(a); see Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662, 678–79 (2009); Ciralsky v. CIA, 355 F.3d 661, 668–71 (D.C. Cir. 2004). … Brown v. Califano, 75 F.R.D. 497, 498 (D.D.C. 1977).

SCIMED LIFE SYSTEMS, INC. v. Medtronic Vascular, Inc.

468 F. Supp. 2d 60 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 31, 2006

Cragg et al. v. Martin v. … Cragg et al. v. Martin v.

Sheppard v. District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 22, 2011

Holy Land Found. for Relief & Dev. v. Ashcroft, 333 F.3d 156, 165 (D.C. Cir. 2003); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242. … Warren v. District of Columbia, 353 F.3d 36, 39 (D.C. Cir. 2004); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242. “Threadbare recitals of the elements of a cause of action, supported by mere conclusory statements, do not suffice.”

Robert Franklin v. District of Columbia

168 F.3d 1360 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 22, 1999

While the panel correctly ruled that Sandin v. … (We specifically left the applicability of Sandin to administrative segregation hearings open in Brown v. Plant, 131 *1362 F.3d 163 (D.C.Cir.1997)).

In Re Midlen

885 A.2d 1280 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 10, 2005

“[DJishonesty,” includes “conduct evincing ‘a lack of honesty, probity or integrity in principle; a lack of fairness and straightforwardness.’ ” In re Shorter, 570 A.2d 760, 767-68 (D.C.1990) (quoting Tucker v. … V. Accepting the Board’s alternative recommendation, we suspend Midlen for eighteen months.

Rhodes v. United States Department of the Army

District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 21, 2025

Ethyl Corp. v. Browner, 989 F.2d 522, 524 (D.C. Cir. 1993); see also Carpenters Indus. Council v. Salazar, 734 F. Supp. 2d 126, 132 (D.D.C. 2010); Sierra Club v. Van Antwerp, 560 F. Supp. 2d 21, 23 (D.D.C. 2008). … See Borud v. Emmert, No. 24-1211-TNM, 2025 WL 894417, at *3 (D.D.C.