Case law

Nash v. . Monroe

198 N.C. 306 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 12, 1930

Armstrong v. Commissioners , 185 N.C. 405 , 117 S.E. 388 . … Adams v. Durham , 189 N.C. 232 , 126 S.E. 611 ; Henderson v. Wilmington, supra .

Williams v. Williams

105 N.C. App. 615 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 3, 1992

Browne v. Browne, 101 N.C. App. 617, 624 , 400 S.E.2d 736, 740 (1991).

State v. . Barbee

187 N.C. 703 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 14, 1924

Minton v. Early, 183 N. C., 200 ; S. v. McRae, 170 N. C., 712 ; S. v. Griffin, 154 N. C., 611 ; S. v. Williams, 150 N. C., 802 ; Bailey v. State of Alabama, 219 U. S., 219 . … And in S. v.

Town of Kenansville v. Summerlin

70 N.C. App. 601 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 2, 1984

Refining Co. v. Board of Aldermen, 284 N.C. 458 , 202 S.E. 2d 129 (1974). If such procedures are inconvenient, the Town should change them, not ignore them. … See Craver v. Board of Adjustment, 267 N.C. 40 , 147 S.E. 2d 599 (1966) (procedural infirmity not automatically prejudicial).

J. E. Latham Co. v. Rogers

170 N.C. 239 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 1, 1915

BrowN, J. … Bank v. Fountain, 148 N. C., 590 ; Bank v. Exum, 163 N. C., 203 . Bank v. Brown, 160 N.

Bowman v. Cox Toyota Scion

224 N.C. App. 1 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 4, 2012

Crisp, a board-certified pain management specialist. Dr. Crisp noted that Plaintiff had severe muscle spasms. According to Dr. … ‘Strictly speaking, the rules of evidence applicable in our general courts do not govern the Commission’s own administrative fact-finding.’ ” Brown v. Kroger Co., 169 N.C.

Greensboro Scuba Sch., LLC v. Robertson

242 N.C. App. 383 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 21, 2015

Background Dawson is the principal operator and instructor at Greensboro Scuba, a dive shop located in Brown Summit, North Carolina. … Shore v. Brown, 324 N.C. 427 , 428, 378 S.E.2d 778 , 779 (1989).

Southern Assembly v. . Palmer

166 N.C. 75 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 30, 1914

School Comrs. v. Board of Aldermen, 158 N. C., pp.. 191-198, citing 1 Lewis Sutherland (2 Ed.), sec. 268; Dodgers v. U. S., 185 U. S., 83 , and other authorities.” … . *82 In Comrs. v. Webb, supra; Corporation Commission v. Construction Co., 160 N. C., 582 ; United Brethren v. Comrs., 115 N. C., 489 ; Loan Assn. v. Comrs., 115 N.

Gordon v. Thomasville Chair Co.

205 N.C. 739 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 24, 1934

We think the facts of this case come within the decision of Bellamy v. Mfg. Co., 200 N. C., 676 . In that ease, after citing numerous authorities, at page 679, is the following: In N. C. R. R. Co. v. Zachary, 232 U. S. … The case of Beavers v. Power Co., ante, 34. “The Photographer case” is easily distinguishable. The judgment of the court below is Affirmed.

Hill v. Huffines Hotel Co.

188 N.C. 586 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 19, 1924

In Brown v. Rhinehart, 112 N. … In support of its contention that there was error the defendant relies on Brown v. Rhinehart, supra.

Jackson v. Carolina Hardwood Co., Inc.

120 N.C. App. 870 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 21, 1995

Stanback v. Stanback, 297 N.C. 181, 202 , 254 S.E.2d 611, 625 (1979). … Brown v. Brown, 21 N.C. App. 435, 437 , 204 S.E.2d 534, 535 (1974).

Wilkins v. Warren

250 N.C. 217 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 29, 1959

To like effect: 86 C.J.S., Theaters & Shows § 41; Hiatt v. Ritter, 223 N.C. 262 , 25 S.E. 2d 756 ; Hahn v. … In Hiatt v.

State v. Barton

335 N.C. 696 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 4, 1994

Brown, the defendant’s psychiatric expert. Near the close of Dr. Brown’s testimony on direct examination, counsel for the defendant asked Dr. … State v.

Nation Ford Baptist Church, Inc. v. Davis

Supreme Court of North Carolina · Aug 19, 2022

Nevertheless, over the next few months and against the wishes of the Board, Pastor Davis continued to conduct  NATION FORD BAPTIST CHURCH V. … If the trial court determines that the Board acted outside the scope of the authority afforded to  NATION FORD BAPTIST CHURCH V.

Hughes v. Clark.

134 N.C. 457 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 22, 1904

In Conrad v. … Pence v. Bryant , 54 W. Va. 263 ; Moore v. Carson, supra .

Caho v. Norfolk & Southern Railway Co.

147 N.C. 20 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 4, 1908

Clonant v. Barnard, 103 N. C., 315 ; Blackimore v. Winders, 144 N. C., 212 . … Corp., sec. 722; Martindale v. Wilson-Cass Co., 134 Pa. St., 348 ( 19 Am. St. Rep., 706 ); Womack Priv. Corp., 472. The authorities are uniform.

Kientz v. Carlton

245 N.C. 236 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 11, 1957

Plaintiff undertook to show the deficiencies in this mower by two witnesses, Tinney and Brown. Tinney had seen it before the trial. Brown’s first observation of it was made at the trial. … Lumber Co. v. R. R., 151 N.C. 217, 220 , 65 S.E. 920 ; Boney v. R. R., 155 N.C. 95, 105 , 71 S.E. 87 . Here neither Tinney nor Brown was tendered as an expert.

Fulford v. Jenkins

363 N.C. 652 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 8, 2009

FULFORD Jr., Executor for the Estate of Mary Fulford v. Antonio Javon JENKINS; County of Duplin; Duplin County Department of Social Services; Millie I. … Brown, Individually and in her Official Capacity as Director of Duplin County Department of Social Services; de Wana Kenan, Individually and in her Official Capacity as a Social Worker with the Duplin County Department of

In Re the Appeal of K-Mart Corp.

319 N.C. 378 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 7, 1987

Thompson v. Board of Education, 292 N.C. 406 , 233 S.E. 2d 538 (1977). … Brock v. Property Tax Comm., *381 290 N.C. 731 , 228 S.E. 2d 254 (1976); N.C.G.S. § 150B-51 (Cum. Supp. 1985).

State v. Pierce

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 3, 2024

State v. Brown Defendant also cites State v. Brown, wherein a defendant had waived an indictment for a charge of armed robbery, but not to the charge of accessory after the fact of armed robbery. State v. … Brown is not controlling. Id. c. State v. Futrelle Defendant also cites State v.