Case law

Corey v. Independent Ice Co.

106 Me. 485 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 5, 1910

Cleaves v. Lord, 43 Maine, 290; North Bank v. Brown, 50 Maine, 214; Sweet v. Brackley, 53 Maine, 346; Whiting v. Burger, 78 Maine, 287; Const. U. S. Art. 4, sec. 1, an act of Congress of May 26, 1790. … See also Stout v. Lye, 103 U. S. 66 ; Werlein v. New Orleans, 177 U. S. 390 ; Harlow v. Bartlett, 170 Mass. 584 . Corbett v.

Rowe v. Bennett

514 A.2d 802 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 27, 1986

Joan Larkin, a board certified psychiatrist. … In Packard v.

Sadowski v. Department of Environmental Protection

Superior Court of Maine · Nov 30, 2005

McKenzie v. Maine Employment Security Comm'n, 453 A.2d 505 (Me. 1982). The time limits found in the APA are jurisdictional and cannot be waived. Brown v. … State Dep't of Manpower A#airs, 426 A.2d 880 (Me. 1981); Persson v. D q ' t of Human Services, 2001 ME 124, 775 A.2d 363. In the present case, the petitioner simply failed to meet the time period by four days.

Hatch v. Portland Terminal Co.

125 Me. 96 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 27, 1925

Reed v. Director General, supra. And Hatch’s duties although he had no occasion to board any train, were with and related to that train. His work was so closely connected therewith as to be part of it. Pederson v. … Co v. Groeger, 266 U. S. 521 , 69 L. ed., 419; decided January 5, 1925; Bragg v. Hatfield, 124 Maine, 391; Jannell v. Myers, 124 Maine, 229, Daughraty v. Tebbetts, 122 Maine, 397; Mears v. Biddle, 122 Maine, 392.

Bowen v. Peters

71 Me. 463 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 7, 1880

The articles were necessary to make the schooner seaworthy; they were delivered on board and became a part of the vessel and outfit. … Elder v. Larrabee, 45 Maine, 590. But in Hardy v.

Maine Employers Mut. Ins. Co. v. Hutton

Superior Court of Maine · Nov 14, 2007

GARBRECHT v. … S Yarmouth Lumber has provided the court with a copy of the Superior Court's decision in Hanover Insurance Co. v.

Napier v. BALDACCI

451 F. Supp. 2d 256 · District Court, D. Maine · Sep 14, 2006

Bonas v. Town of N. … See Pye v. Sullivan Bros.

Trafton v. Sunbury Primary Care, P.A.

689 F. Supp. 2d 198 · District Court, D. Maine · Feb 25, 2010

Gaydar, 345 F.3d at 24 ; see also Payton v. … Brown v.

Goodell v. N.V. Michel Van de Wiele SA

Superior Court of Maine · Jul 27, 2010

See Brown v. Crown Equip. … Brown, 2008 ME 186, ~ 14, 960 A.2d at 1193. VDW owed Flemish a duty to provide a reasonably safe, non-defective product. Adams v. Buffalo Forge Co., 443 A.2d 932, 941 (Me. 1982).

Markley v. Semle

713 A.2d 945 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 23, 1998

Mariello v. Giguere, 667 A.2d 588, 591 (Me.1995). Generally, we review the trial court’s implicit *947 factual findings for clear error. See Board of Overseers of the Bar v. Sylvester, 650 A.2d 702, 704 (Me.1994). … Cutts v.

Peaks Island Co., Inc. v. City of Portland

Superior Court of Maine · Dec 17, 2001

See Sargent V. Sargent, 622 A.2d 721 (Me. 1993) (concluding that the complaint did not facially reveal that it was barred as a matter of law); Freeman v. … Here, the plaintiff's 80B complaint must be dismissed for lack of exhaustion of administrative remedies because the plaintiff has not appealed the planning board decision to the zoning board of appeals.

Richter v. Ercolini

Superior Court of Maine · Jan 6, 2009

SUSANNE RICHTER Plaintiff ORDER v. … Truman v. Browne, 2001 ME 182, CJI 9, 788 A.2d 168, 170. The Law Court has held that " [t]here is a strong preference in our law for deciding cases on the merits. Thomas v. Thompson, 653 A.2d 417,420 (Me. 1995).

Maine Mutual Fire Insurance v. Watson

532 A.2d 686 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 22, 1987

The insured testified at trial that he understood the adjuster to mean “that’s every last board and nail; and if I didn’t complete it in that time, the rest of it would come out of my pocket.” … Gross v. Green Mountain Ins. Co., 506 A.2d 1139, 1141 (Me.1986); Baybutt Const. Corp. v. Commercial Union Ins. Co., 455 A.2d 914, 921 (Me.1983). 2 .

U.S. Bank, N.A. v. Lowell

Superior Court of Maine · Jul 9, 2014

First, in Raymond v. … See Poussard v.

Gerrish v. Chambers

135 Me. 70 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 11, 1937

Savings Institution v. Johnston and Jose, 133 Me., 445, 180 A., 322 ; Meader v. Cummings, 131 Me., 445, 163 A., 792 ; Adams v. Ketchum, 129 Me., 212, 151 A., 146 ; Merryman v. Jones, 126 Me., 130, 131, 136 A., 667 . … Burnham v. Heselton, 82 Me., 495, 500, 20 A., 80 ; Eldridge v. May, 129 Me., 112, 116, 150 A., 378 ; Mallett v. Hall, 129 Me., 148, 153, 150 A., 531 . The defendants insist that the money which Mrs.

In re Perkins

155 F. 237 · District Court, D. Maine · Jul 24, 1907

Ludden v. Hazen, 31 Barb. (N. Y.) 650; Frank v. Batten, 49 Hun, 91 , 1 N. Y. Supp. 705 ; Bonesteel v. Flack, 41 Barb. (N. Y.) 435. … In Flint Wagon Works v. John S.

Coker v. City of Lewiston

710 A.2d 909 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 30, 1998

The City, relying on Rad-vanovsky v. Maine Dept. of Manpower Affairs, 427 A.2d 961 (Me.1981) and Closson v. … See Beaulieu v. City of Lewiston, 440 A.2d 334, 344 (Me.1982). 3 We look first to the plain meaning of the statutory language as a means of effecting the legislative intent. See Daniels v.

Hayford v. Cunningham

72 Me. 128 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 7, 1881

An. 30; Jackson v. Propeller Kinnie, 8 Am. Law. Peg. (N. S.) 470; Murphy v. Mobile Co. 49 Ala. 436 ; Crawford v. Bark Caroline Reed, 42 Cal. 471 ; Cavender v. Fanny Barker, 40 Mo. 235 ; Wyatt v. … Y. 52 ; Brookman v. Hamrill, Id. 554; Happy v. Mosher, 48 Id: 313; King v. Greenway, 71 N. Y. 417 ; Wilson v. Lawrence, 82 N. Y. 409 .

SMITH v. DAEDONG-USA INC

District Court, D. Maine · Jun 26, 2020

Brown v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 402 F. Supp. 2d 303, 310 (D. Me. 2005) (alterations omitted) (quoting Fed. R. Evid. 702 advisory committee’s note to 2000 amendment); see also id. at 308. … See Brown, 402 F. Supp. 2d at 310.

Mohamud v. State of Maine

Superior Court of Maine · Mar 8, 2012

WIOHAwiUD, Petitioner, V. … See Brown v. State, 426 A.2d 880, 888 (:tvle. 1981) (stating "expressly that the [:tvlaine Administrative Procedure] Act's time limitations are jurisdictional"); see also City of Lewiston v. Me.