Case law

Wright v. Eugene & Agnes E. Meyer Foundation

District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 29, 2021

Brown v. Sessoms, 774 F.3d 1016, 1022 (D.C. Cir. 2014) (quoting Forkkio v. Powell, 306 F.3d 1127, 1130 (D.C. Cir. 2002)); see also Domino’s Pizza, Inc. v. … Bray v. RHT, Inc., 748 F. Supp. 3, 5 (D.D.C. 1990); see also Ndondji v. InterPark Inc., 768 F.

Absolute Healthcare v. NLRB

103 F.4th 61 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 31, 2024

Corp. v. NLRB, 379 U.S. 203, 216 (1954). … We therefore vacate the portion of the Board’s decision ordering those remedies. See Bozzuto’s Inc. v.

Dickens v. United States

19 A.3d 321 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 5, 2011

Brown left his car and asked appellant if he could talk to him, whereupon appellant “took off running.” Brown got back into his car to follow appellant while Officers Kenny and Foster chased him on foot. … See Holt v.

Lynch v. Tobriner

237 F. Supp. 313 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 12, 1965

The pertinent testimony adduced before the Police and Firemen’s Retirement and Relief Board was the medical report of Dr. Victor H. Esch, Member of the Board of Police and Fire Surgeons; Dr. G. … See Crawford v. McLaughlin, 109 U.S.App. D.C. 264, 286 F.2d 821 . Counsel for the plaintiff will prepare the appropriate order not inconsistent with this opinion.

Brewer v. D.C. Financial Responsibility & Management Assistance Authority

953 F. Supp. 406 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 17, 1997

Board of Trustees of U.D.C., 794 F.Supp. 420, 422 (D.D.C.1992); Rasul v. District of Columbia, 680 F.Supp. 436, 439 (D.D.C.1988); Dougherty v. Barry, 604 F.Supp. 1424, 1442 (D.D.C.1985). 4 b. … See Keyishian v. Board of Regents, 385 U.S. 589, 592 , 87 S.Ct. 675, 678 , 17 L.Ed.2d 629 (1967); see also Bois v. Marsh, 801 F.2d 462 , 466 & n. 6 (D.C.Cir.1986).

Air Line Pilots Association International v. Federal Express Corporation

139 F. Supp. 3d 320 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 28, 2015

.”); Air Line Pilots Ass’n v. … Minor disputes are within the exclusive jurisdiction of system boards. See Consol. Rail Corp. v. Ry. Labor Execs.

Aircraft & Diesel Equipment Corp. v. Hirsch

62 F. Supp. 520 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 28, 1945

In the case of Coffman v. … National Labor Relations Board v. Mackay Radio & Telegraph Co., 304 U.S. 333 , 58 S.Ct. 904 , 82 L.Ed. 1381 . In the case of Arrow Distilleries, Inc., v.

In re Dana W. Johnson

103 A.3d 194 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 13, 2014

XI, § 16 (c). 1 Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Maryland v. … The Board then directed Mr.

Kingman Park Civic Association v. Gray

27 F. Supp. 3d 142 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 14, 2014

See Ekwem v. … For Washington’s Riverfront Parks v. Thompson, 451 A.2d 1177, 1183 (D.C. 1982) (citing Shiflett v. Dist. of Columbia Board of Appeals and Review, 431 A.2d 9, 10-11 (D.C. 1981)).

In re Johnson

48 A.3d 170 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 12, 2012

turpitude. 1 We adopt the Board’s unopposed recommendation. … Evans v. United States, 504 U.S. 255, 268 , 112 S.Ct. 1881 , 119 L.Ed.2d 57 (1992).

Perry v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters

118 F. Supp. 3d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 15, 2015

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). … Bush v.

Medford v. District of Columbia

691 F. Supp. 1473 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 13, 1988

Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483, 493 , 74 S.Ct. 686, 691 , 98 L.Ed. 873 (1954) (“... it is doubtful that any child may reasonably be expected to succeed in life if he is denied the opportunity of an education. … Congress gave meaning to Brown for handicapped children when it enacted the EHA in 1975 and “conferr[ed] upon disabled students an enforceable substantive right to public education.” Honig v.

Jackson v. Correctional Corporation of America

564 F. Supp. 2d 22 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 14, 2008

See Brown v. Dist. of Columbia, Civil Action No. 04-2195, 2005 WL 3276267 , at *3 (D.D.C. … Brown v. Argenbright Security, Inc., 782 A.2d 752, 757 (D.C.2001) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted); see also District of Columbia v.

Pan American World Airways, Inc. And Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Sudflug Suddeutsche Fluggesellschaft Mbh, Intervenor. Pan American World Airways, Inc. And Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. Robert T. Murphy, Sudflug Suddeutsche Fluggesellschaft Mbh, Intervenor

392 F.2d 483 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 31, 1968

Switchmen's Union [of North America] v. [National] Mediation Board, 320 U.S. 297, 301 [, 64 S.Ct. 95 , 88 L.Ed. 61 ]. … Sparks v. C. A.

Kilpatrick v. Riley

98 F. Supp. 2d 9 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 27, 2000

Jarrell v. USPS, 753 F.2d 1088, 1091 (D.C.Cir.1985) (citing Brown v. GSA, 425 U.S. 820, 832-33 , 96 S.Ct. 1961 , 48 L.Ed.2d 402 (1976)). … See Jolly v. Listerman, 672 F.2d 935, 953 (D.C.Cir.1982); Childers v. Slater, 44 F.Supp.2d 8, 19 (D.D.C.1999); Brown v. Bentsen, 921 F.Supp. 1, 2 (D.D.C.1995); accord Norman v.

Chlorine Institute, Inc. v. Federal Railroad Administration

718 F.3d 922 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 11, 2013

Rush were on brief for amicus curiae Association of American Railroads in support of the respondents.  2 Before: HENDERSON, BROWN and KAVANAUGH, Circuit Judges. … Petroleum Inst. v. EPA, 683 F.3d 382, 386 (D.C. Cir. 2012); see Blanchette v. Conn. Gen. Ins.

Catholic Health Initiatives v. Sebelius

658 F. Supp. 2d 113 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 30, 2009

DOT, 843 F.2d at 1452; see also Humane Society v. Kempthorne, 579 F.Supp.2d at 13 . III. DISCUSSION Plaintiffs challenge the Board’s decision disallowing reimbursement. See Compl. ¶¶ 115-17. … While the PRM provision itself would be due less deference than a Board decision, see Public Citizen, Inc. v.

APCC Services, Inc. v. AT & T CORP.

254 F. Supp. 2d 135 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 28, 2003

United Food and Commercial Workers Union Local 751 v. Brown Group, Inc., 517 U.S. 544, 551 , 116 S.Ct. 1529 , 134 L.Ed.2d 758 (1996). … Workers Union Local 751 v. Brown Group, Inc., 517 U.S. 544 , 116 S.Ct. 1529 , 134 L.Ed.2d 758 (1996) [hereinafter “Brown Group ”]. (See Pis.’ Opp. at 19-20.) Plaintiffs’ reliance is, however, misplaced.

Davis v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp.

734 F.3d 1161 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 1, 2013

The Pilots were represented by counsel throughout the Board proceedings. As to the timing of the Schofield declaration, the Pilots rely on Esch v. Yeutter, 876 F.2d 976, 991 (D.C. … Davis v. PBGC, 815 F. Supp. 2d at 292.

Baxley v. Wormuth

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 15, 2024

See Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520 (1972). … the Board’s interpretation of Army Regulation 600-85 under Kisor v.