Case law

Murphy v. . City of Charlotte

174 N.C. 771 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 28, 1917

Freeman v. Perdue Farms, Inc.

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Sep 29, 1997

Brown or on October 26, 1994, by Dr. Neal. … Carter v. Northern Telecom, 123 N.C. App. 547 , 473 S.E.2d 774 (1996). 4.

Town of Kenansville v. Summerlin

70 N.C. App. 601 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 2, 1984

Refining Co. v. Board of Aldermen, 284 N.C. 458 , 202 S.E. 2d 129 (1974). If such procedures are inconvenient, the Town should change them, not ignore them. … See Craver v. Board of Adjustment, 267 N.C. 40 , 147 S.E. 2d 599 (1966) (procedural infirmity not automatically prejudicial).

Bank v. . Bank

183 N.C. 463 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · May 10, 1922

Board of Health v. Comrs. , 173 N.C. 250 -253, citing Pritchard v. Comrs. , 126 N.C. 9089 13; Hopper v. Covington , 118 U.S. 148 -151; Equitable Assurance v. Brown , 213 U.S. 25 , and other cases. … In Bank v.

Covington v. . Wyatt

196 N.C. 367 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 12, 1928

Ledbetter v. English , 166 N.C. 125 . This familiar principle has been recognized in a number of subsequent decisions. Zagier v. Express Co. , 171 N.C. 692 , Stone v. Texas Co. , 180 N.C. 546 ; Albritton v. … Brewer v. Ring , 177 N.C. 476 ; Thornburg v. Long , 178 N.C. 589 ; Nash v. Royster , 189 N.C. 408 .

Bryan v. Raynor

94 N.C. App. 173 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 6, 1989

Neigborhood Assoc. v. Town of Chapel Hill, 63 N.C. App. 244, 253 , 304 S.E. 2d 251, 256 (1983) (quoting Refining Co. v. … Municipal boards are not strictly bound by the formal rules of evidence, which is in accordance with their quasi-judicial nature. See Burton v. New Hanover City Zoning Bd., 49 N.C.

Parker v. . Harden

122 N.C. 111 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 22, 1898

Bernhardt v. Brown, 118, N. C., at p. 700. … King v. Dudley, 113 N. C., 167 , and cases cited Clark’s Code (2nd Ed.), pp. 223, 224. Appeal dismissed.

Jackson v. Carolina Hardwood Co., Inc.

120 N.C. App. 870 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 21, 1995

Stanback v. Stanback, 297 N.C. 181, 202 , 254 S.E.2d 611, 625 (1979). … Brown v. Brown, 21 N.C. App. 435, 437 , 204 S.E.2d 534, 535 (1974).

Farmer v. . Willard

71 N.C. 284 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 5, 1874

Hubbard v. Troy, 2 Ired., 134 . It was objected that the plaintiff could not recover the value of the land, because there was no note or memorandum in writing, given by the party to be charged. … Robeson v. Brown, 63 N. C., 554 , and subsequent cases. The consideration of the bill was land, and the jury, by their verdict, have ascertained its value in the present currency. There is no error. Pee Cueiam.

Hoffler v. Hagel

122 F. Supp. 3d 438 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Aug 10, 2015

Union v. Fed. … In the context of military boards, “decisions are subject to judicial review and can be set aside if they are arbitrary, capricious or not based on substantial evidence.” Chappell v.

Boyd v. City of Wilmington, NC

943 F. Supp. 585 · District Court, E.D. North Carolina · Oct 23, 1996

Patterson v. McLean Credit Union, 39 F.3d 515, 518 (4th Cir.1994) (quoting Shaw v. … (Brown Dep. at 96-97).

Smith v. School Trustees.

141 N.C. 143 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 17, 1906

Board of Education, 4 W. Va., 499 ; Smith v. Bohler, 72 Ga., 546 ; Landis v. Ashworth, 57 N. J., 510; Carson v. St. Francis Levee District, 59 Ark., 513; State v. Leffingwell, 54 Mo., 458 . In McCormac v. … In Kuhn v.

Chadwick v. . Insurance Co.

158 N.C. 380 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 20, 1912

Cureton v. Garrison, 111 N. C., 272 ; Loftis v. Raxter, 66 N. C., 340 ; Wooley v. Robinson, 52 N. C., 30 . These *382 cases have been cited and approved, Sitton v. Lumber Co., 135 N. … In Brown v. R. R., 140 N.

Wilkins v. Warren

250 N.C. 217 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 29, 1959

To like effect: 86 C.J.S., Theaters & Shows § 41; Hiatt v. Ritter, 223 N.C. 262 , 25 S.E. 2d 756 ; Hahn v. … In Hiatt v.

Fracaro v. Priddy

514 F. Supp. 191 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · May 1, 1981

Priddy’s perception of the Board’s authority, and the Board members’ perception of the Board’s authority do not alter the fact that the Board had no authority to dismiss Mrs. Fracaro. See Hall v. … Williams v. Board of Regents of the University System, 629 F.2d 993 (5th Cir. 1980).

Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education v. Disability Rights of North Carolina

District Court, W.D. North Carolina · Dec 31, 2019

Plaintiff Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education (“Plaintiff” or “CMBE”) controls and operates Mecklenburg County public schools, including the Metro School. … Newport News Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co. v. Brown, 376 F.3d 245, 248 (4th Cir. 2004).

Smith v. TEACHERS'AND STATE EMPLOYEES'RETIREMENT SYSTEM

364 N.C. 621 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 15, 2010

705 S.E.2d 360 (2010) Phyllis Dianne SMITH, on behalf of herself and all others similarly situated v. … TEACHERS' AND STATE EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT SYSTEM, a corporation; Board of Trustees of the Teachers' and State Employees' Retirement System, a body politic and corporate; Department of State Treasurer, Retirement Systems Division

Bouvier v. Porter

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 5, 2021

BOUVIER V. … BOUVIER V.

Bateman v. . Sterrett

201 N.C. 59 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 15, 1931

C., 321 ; Brown v. Jennings, 188 N. C., 155 , 124 S. E., 150 ; Eubanks v. Becton, 158 N. C., 230 , 73 S. E., 1009 . … Ashley v. Brown, 198 N. C., 369 , 151 S. E., 125 ; Stanback v. Bank, 197 N. C., 292 , 148 S. E., 313 . Affirmed.

State v. Whitley

213 N.C. App. 630 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jul 19, 2011

State v. … State v. Chambers, 52 N.C. App. 713, 721 , 280 S.E.2d 175, 180 (1981).