Case law

In Re Zakroff

934 A.2d 409 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 25, 2007

Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Maryland v. Zakroff, 387 Md. 603 , 876 A.2d 664, 678 (2005). 2 . … Board Report at 9 n. 4.

Beard v. Stahr

200 F. Supp. 766 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 15, 1961

In Reaves v. … Harmon v.

Food Store Employees Union, Local 347, Amalgamated Meat Cutters And Butcher Workmen Of North America, Aflcio v. National Labor Relations Board

422 F.2d 685 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 3, 1969

In exercising this judgment the Board owed no deference to its trial examiner. Cf. Universal Camera Corp. v. NLRB, 340 U.S. 474, 494-496 , 71 S.Ct. 456 , 95 L.Ed. 456 (1951); Oil, Chemical & Atomic Workers v. … Workers v. NLRB, 111 U.S.App.D.C. 383 , 389, 298 F. 2d 297 , 303 (1961) cert. denied, Gulf Bottlers Inc. v. NLRB, 369 U.S. 843 , 82 S.Ct. 875 , 7 L.Ed.2d 847 , (1962); see also NLRB v.

Dickens v. United States

19 A.3d 321 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 5, 2011

Brown left his car and asked appellant if he could talk to him, whereupon appellant “took off running.” Brown got back into his car to follow appellant while Officers Kenny and Foster chased him on foot. … See Holt v.

Klayman v. Fox

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 5, 2019

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). … Corp. v.

Goldberg v. Roumel

40 A.2d 253 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 14, 1944

Brown v. Randle & Garvin, D.C.Mun.App., 32 A.2d 104 . Merchants’ Bank v. Affholter, 140 Ark. 480 , 215 S.W. 648 ; Congregation B’Nai Israel v. Dymytruk, 129 Conn. 415 , 28 A.2d 872 ; Harris v. … Minick v. Associates Inv. Co., 71 App.D.C. 367 , 110 F.2d 267 . Kunkel v. Brown, 4 Cir., 99 F. 593 ; Ross v.

William B. Ogden v. Eugene M. Zuckert, Secretary of the Air Force

298 F.2d 312 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 14, 1961

The Secretary relies on our cases of Bolger v. Marshall, 90 U.S.App.D.C. 30 , 193 F.2d 37 , and Young v. Higley, 95 U.S.App.D.C. 122 , 220 F.2d 487 , and on the Second Circuit case of Michaelson v. … And in Levers v.

District of Columbia v. Montgomery

453 A.2d 808 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 8, 1982

We reject appellees’ argument that there is a meaningful distinction between the situation in Carey v. … Here, as in Carey v. Piphus and in D.C. v. Gray, the agency’s action was defective because the requisite procedure was not followed.

Hawkins v. Butler-Truesdale

584 A.2d 1241 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 19, 1990

Board of Elections and Ethics (Board of Elections), and to declare the “true results” of the election. … This case is controlled by Boone v. Taylor, 256 A.2d 411 (D.C.1969), in which this court effectively held that § 31-101(a) does not prohibit partisan campaigning for membership on the Board of Education.

Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

533 F.3d 820 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 22, 2008

Co. v. FERC, 295 F.3d 1, 10 (D.C. Cir. 2002). … Comm’n v. FERC, 522 F.3d 378, 398 (D.C. Cir. 2008).

Stern Produce Company, Inc. v. NLRB

97 F.4th 1 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 26, 2024

That cannot sustain the Board’s finding. See Beverly Cal. Corp. v. NLRB, 227 F.3d 817, 835 (7th Cir. 2000). … In particular, the Board has held that an employer may not discipline an employee because of “anti-union animus.” NLRB v. Transp. Mgmt.

Vince v. Mabus

852 F. Supp. 2d 96 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 31, 2012

Once a civilian board makes a final decision, its decision is “subject to judicial review under § 706 of the Administrative Procedure Act.” Pettiford v. Sec’y of the Navy, 774 F. … In Fuller v.

Command Consulting Group, LLC v. Neuraliq, Inc.

623 F. Supp. 2d 49 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 9, 2009

Browning *51 v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C.Cir.2002). … Passenger Corp. v. Veolia Transp. Servs., Inc., 592 F.Supp.2d 86, 98 (D.D.C.2009) (citing Carr v. Brown, 395 A.2d 79, 84 (D.C.1978)); Siegel v. Ridgewells, Inc., 511 F.Supp.2d 188, 195 (D.D.C.2007).

American Federation of Government Employees v. Barry

459 A.2d 1045 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 29, 1983

See District of Columbia v. Washington Home Ownership Council, Inc., 415 A.2d 1349 (D.C.App.1980) (en banc). See also Bishop v. … Barry v. Public Employee Relations Board, 109 Wash.D.L.Rptr. 1781 (D.C.Super.Ct. June 30, 1981). Appellants continue to maintain that only “unforeseen circumstances” may be the basis for emergency legislation. 10 .

Duru v. District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 9, 2018

at 1183 (quoting Milton v. Weinberger, 696 F.2d 94, 100 (D.C. Cir. 1982) and citing Pignato v. Am. Trans. … Brown’s infraction and chose not to discipline her. See Isse v. Am. Univ., 540 F.

Lewis-Hall Iron Works v. Blair

23 F.2d 972 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 3, 1928

This court will take judicial notice of the Board’s rules when regularly promulgated. Goldsmith v. Board of Tax Appeals, 55 App. D. … See Weaver v. Blair, Commissioner (C. C. A.) 19 F.(2d) 16 , and Reliance Mfg. Co. v. Blair, Commissioner (C. C.

In Re Webster

661 A.2d 144 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 22, 1995

Based upon respondent’s misconduct in Palau, the Board on Professional Responsibility (Board) recommends the imposition of reciprocal discipline against respondent. … See Bowoon Sangsa Co. v. Micronesian Indus. Carp., 720 F.2d 595 , 599 (9th Cir.1983). 9 .

United States v. Neverson

12 D.C. 152 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 7, 1880

State v. … Craig, whom Brown had identified as the man who had been with him on the night of the murder,, that the said Brown had made the said statements to and the said requests of the said Craig at the time and place in the said

National Automobile Dealers Ass'n v. Federal Trade Commission

670 F.3d 268 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 6, 2012

Before: ROGERS, GARLAND, and BROWN, Circuit Judges.  2 Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge GARLAND. … To implement this change, the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) and the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System promulgated amendments to their respective risk-based pricing rules on July 15, 2011.

Taylor v. Islamic Republic of Iran

881 F. Supp. 2d 19 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 2, 2012

Islamic Republic of Iran, 853 F.Supp.2d 44 (D.D.C.2012); Davis v. Islamic Republic of Iran, No. 07-cv-1302, 882 F.Supp.2d 7 (D.D.C. Mar.30, 2012), 2012 WL 1059700 ; Estate of Brown v. … .); Estate of Brown v. Islamic Republic of Iran, No. 08-cv-531, 872 F.Supp.2d 37 , 2012 WL 2562368 (D.D.C.2012) (Lamberth, C.J.); Fain v.