Case law

Gurganus v. Gurganus

252 N.C. App. 1 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 21, 2017

V. … As detailed above, in this case plaintiff filed a complaint for divorce from bed and board on 15 March 2001 and defendant responded by filing an answer and counterclaim for a divorce from bed and board on 29 May 2001.

Fogle v. GASTON CTY. BD. OF ED.

29 N.C. App. 423 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 14, 1976

Rogers v. Davis, 212 N.C. 35 , 192 S.E. 872 (1937). … State v. Camp, 286 N.C. 148 , 209 S.E.2d 754 (1974).

State v. . Savage

161 N.C. 245 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 13, 1912

This statute was discussed in S. v. Brown, 113 N. C., 646 , and construed in accordance with the ruling of his Honor. No error.

Vaitovas v. City of Greenville

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 19, 2020

Vaitovas sued the City of Greenville and the Pitt County Board of Education, and also the State of North Carolina, through official-capacity claims against Phil  VAITOVAS V. … Harwood v. Johnson, 326 N.C. 231, 238, 388 S.E.2d 439, 443 (1990). -2-  VAITOVAS V.

Hancock v. Commissioners of Craven County

132 N.C. 209 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 24, 1903

The board removed me February 1st, 1899, and employed D. L. Ward. I received $50. The board revoked resolution *211 of December 5th. I offered to perform the services and the board refused to have me. … We think that the board had the power to make the contract for the term of two years that being the term for which it was elected. Roper v. Town of Laurinburg, 90 N. C., 427 .

Chesnutt v. Peters

300 N.C. 359 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 3, 1980

of the Board’s evidence. … Thompson v. Board of Education, 292 N.C. 406, 410 , 233 S.E. 2d 538, 541 (1977).

In re Guess

89 N.C. App. 711 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 19, 1988

Proceeding under this provision the Board charged Dr. … Upon appeal to the Superior Court the Board’s order was reversed and vacated and the Board appealed to this Court. Since “[t]he State can only regulate for the protection of the public,” State v.

Huntley v. Potter

255 N.C. 619 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 22, 1961

People v. Omen, 124 N.E. 860, 863 . … Styers v. Gastonia, 252 N.C. 572 , 114 S.E. 2d 348 ; Honey Properties, Inc. v. Gastonia, 252 N.C. 567 , 114 S.E. 2d 344 .

Matter of Golia-Paladin

327 N.C. 132 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jul 26, 1990

The Board denied applicant’s request to withdraw his application, and the superior court held that the Board did not abuse its discretion in so doing. We affirm the superior court. … Having concluded that the applicant failed to satisfy the Board of his compliance with this requirement, the Board had a duty to deny the application. Baker v. Varser, 240 N.C. 260 , 82 S.E.2d 90 (1954).

Guye v. Deviprya, LLC

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Oct 5, 2005

Leggette v. McCotter, 265 N.C. 617 , 144 S.E.2d 849 (1965). The test for joint employment was established in Collins v. … The right of control over Kat's employees belonged to Kathryn Brown. Id. 5. The plaintiff has cited Henderson v. Manpower of Guilford County, Inc., 70 N.C.

State v. Gibson

32 N.C. App. 584 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 16, 1977

Spinelli v. U. S., 393 U.S. 410 , 21 L.Ed. 2d 637 , 89 S.Ct. 584 (1968); Aguilar v. Texas, 378 U.S. 108 , 12 L.Ed. 2d 723 , 84 S.Ct. 1509 (1964); State v. … State v. Ellington, 284 N.C. 198 , 200 S.E. 2d 177 (1973); State v. Caldwell, 25 N.C. App. 269 , 212 S.E. 2d 669 (1975); State v. Brown, 20 N.C.

Godwin v. . Bank

145 N.C. 320 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 30, 1907

Brown v. Dail , 117 N.C. 41 ; Williams v. Chapman , (327) 118 N.C. 943 ; Chemical Co. v. McNair , 139 N.C. 326 ; Nelson v. Edwards , 40 Barbour, 283. … Walker v. Brown , 165 U.S. 655 ; Hauseet v. Harrison , 105 U.S. 401 ; Union Trust Co. v. Bulkely , 150 Fed., 510 ; In re J. F. Grandy , 146 Fed., 318 ; Wilder v. Watts , 138 Fed., 436 ; Sabin v.

Piedmont Aviation, Inc. v. Raleigh-Durham Airport Authority

288 N.C. 98 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 26, 1975

The statement in Candler v. … In Morgan v.

APAC-Atlantic, Inc. v. City of Salisbury

210 N.C. App. 668 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 5, 2011

See generally Land v. Village of Wesley Chapel,-N.C. … Because “one of the functions of a Board of Adjustment is to interpret local zoning ordinances,” we must “give some deference to the Board’s interpretation of its own City Code.” CG&T Corp. v.

Stansbury v. . Guilford County

226 N.C. 41 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jan 31, 1946

The challenge is solely to the authority of the Board of Commissioners of Guilford County to pay the plaintiff more than the $1,800.00 authorized by chapter 427, Public-Local Laws of 1927. Kendall v. Stafford, 178 N. … Hill v. Stansbury, supra; Reed v. Madison, 213 N. C., 145 , 195 S. E., 620 ; Carolina Beach v. Mintz, 212 N. C., 578 , 194 S. E., 309 ; Commissioners of Brunswick v. Walker, 203 N. C., 505, 166 S. E., 385 ; Kendall v.

Freeman v. Perdue Farms, Inc.

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Sep 29, 1997

Brown or on October 26, 1994, by Dr. Neal. … Carter v. Northern Telecom, 123 N.C. App. 547 , 473 S.E.2d 774 (1996). 4.

Shavitz v. City of High Point

270 F. Supp. 2d 702 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Jul 9, 2003

Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 569 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2705 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972). … v.

Messer v. . Smathers

213 N.C. 183 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 2, 1938

Moore v. Board of Education , 212 N.C. 499 ; Crabtree v. Board of Education , 199 N.C. 645 , 155 S.E. 550 ; Clark v. McQueen , 195 N.C. 714 , 143 S.E. 528 ; Board of Education v. … Forrest , 190 N.C. 753 , 130 S.E. 621 ; McInnish v. Board of Education , 187 N.C. 494 , 122 S.E. 182 ; School Com. v. Board of Education , 186 N.C. 643 , 120 S.E. 202 ; Davenport v.

State v. Edwards

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Nov 1, 2022

State v. Marino, 265 N.C. App. 546, 549, 828 S.E.2d 689, 692 (2019).  STATE V. … See State v.

Futures Grp., Inc. v. Brosnan

2022 NCBC 79 · North Carolina Business Court · Dec 7, 2022

In 2009, Brosnan and Futures, acting through its Board of Directors (the “Board”), agreed by letter agreement to modify the Note (the “Modification”). … (emphasis added)); Black v.